I just read that thread about awful experiences during dissertation defenses.
My own was an absolute breeze. I had a fantastic time. I was asked tough questions that were fair, helped me showcase that I actually knew my stuff, and then gave me an opportunity to shine through.
HOWEVER... and herein lies the rub, and this is the reason why I spend at least 2 weeks full time working with my doctoral students on their defenses, pre-defense:
My advisor made me do dry runs and send him draft slides over 3 weeks before my doctoral dissertation defense.
I did at least 4 dry runs with him where we went through the changes that needed to be made. He was thorough but never rude.
Then I did a mock defense with @hishamzerriffi (my best friend) as my audience. He gave me extensive feedback on the slides, my presentation style, etc.
After that last dry run I had a good night sleep, didn't look at my slides until 30 minutes before my defense, and after I was done, my advisor emailed his entire lab to say "Raul's defense is the model of what I expect from a PhD viva - outstanding performance, incredible work".
With my own doctoral students, I ask them for a draft of their slides at least 2 weeks in advance, and we do fortnightly dry runs for at least a week, and then a couple more right before the defense.
And they DO ace their defenses :)
(YMMV, as always).
</end thread>
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: A student (new to my methods) asked me what I did when I could not highlight.
Most people know I don’t mark my own books (nor the library’s!) but you can do with yours whatever you want.
Since I don’t mark my books, the highlighting and annotating methods I use ...
... may not work in the same way.
Since I prefer analog systems and do not mark books up, here are a few ways in which I take notes that still retain some of the characteristics of my strategies for printed materials.
I’ll outline them in separate tweets.
1) THE INDEX CARD METHOD:
Since I have used them since grade school, I often take notes of books on index cards.
I usually categorize by colour of said index card, unless I run out of color-coded ones in which case I use non-coloured ones, but with a 1/2” coloured plastic tab
There's one element that isn't discussed here: the heterogeneity in teaching styles, technological expertise and competency, and pedagogical training.
For people who do weekly seminars, it would appear as though they could just transport the concept across, just online.
So, I (with some level of pedagogical training, tech literacy and a teaching style and courses that suit more offline work that does not involve any contact with computers, or reduces online work), could potentially actually manage to reduce students' workload.
El día de hoy di una clase en el curso conjunto de @CPliscoff de @EGGP_UCHILE y @psanabria de @GobiernoUAndes a la cual invité a mis estudiantes de @FlacsoMx (y colegas y estudiantes de otras universidades a quienes superviso).
Hablé del saneamiento y suministro de servicios.
Una pregunta que me hicieron en la clase me dejó un poco preocupado porque he oído a estudiantes de políticas y administración pública que dicen “el gobierno no PUEDE ofrecer un servicio público como la provisión de baños públicos universal”.
Casi me da el soponcio
El gobierno tiene entre sus muchas funciones el proveer servicios públicos a la sociedad. Decir que “el gobierno no PUEDE ofrecer servicios” lo exime, incorrecta e indebidamente, de su responsabilidad.
"How do I go from having the Detailed Outline to actually writing a Memorandum (or a series of Memos) that I can then assemble into the full draft of the paper?"
Well, everyone: Grab a chair because HERE IT GOES.
As you all know I’m finishing a chapter on ethnography in comparative environmental politics.
Comparative is what I do and who I am.
This doesn’t mean that it’s any easier to write. So I always go back to basics.
1) Initial Outline. Basic layout of ideas, headings/thoughts.
2) Break down each chapter heading/main idea into ideas/Topic Sentences/Triggering Questions.
As you can see here, I grabbed the “ethnography in CEP” and started writing Triggering Questions that help trigger my thinking.
I start adding more detail to the heading outline.