1/9

China is aging so rapidly that it urgently needs to address the problem of a rapidly declining work force in a slowly declining population. To give an idea of relative population changes among the three most populous countries, today there...

scmp.com/economy/articl…
2/9

are 4.3 Chinese for every American and 4.7 Chinese of working age (ages 15-64), while there is just over 1 Chinese for every Indian and 1.1 Chinese of working age.

By the end of the century, however, there are expected to be 2.5 Chinese for every American and...
3/9

just 2.4 Chinese of working age, while there will be 1.4 Indians for every Chinese and 1.5 Indians of working age. Over the rest of this century, in other words, while China’s population declines quite rapidly relative to that of the two other most populous countries, it...
4/9

also switches from having a much better dependency ratio than either to having a worse one than either, with far more of its dependents being the elderly rather than children. In effect its working age population will drop by half relative to those of the other two.
5/9

This is going to be a very tough problem to resolve, although to the extent China succeeds, it will be very useful as an example for other countries. I am not sure they are going about it the right way, however. Making seniors make better use of smart technology sounds...
6/9

very exciting and high tech, and might even help a little, as will lifting the retirement age, but the former is likely to have little effect on the overall economy or on the underlying imbalances, and the latter mostly catches China up to other urban economies.
7/9

What is more, the idea that getting seniors jobs will boost consumption and help rebalance the economy is, of course, not true. While it might raise per capita GDP (slightly), it only increases consumption indirectly, by increasing production more. Without seriously...
8/9

reforming the way income is distributed, this would only make the imbalances worse. The best way to rebalance the economy in this case would be to increase pensions and social benefits for the elderly. It would also be politically popular, and while at first it might be...
9/9

opposed by local governments, who would be forced to foot the bill, it would eventually allow them to reduce spending on non-productive investment as it is replaced by an increase in productive business investment encouraged by higher direct and indirect consumption.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

1 Dec
1/5

An expansion of debt really isn't "a crisis of the next generation", as one German politicians insists. Too much debt can certainly be a problem for the economy if it sets off financial distress costs, or results in harmful distributions of...

ft.com/content/8d0bdc…
2/5

income, but for an economy that borrows in its own currency, borrowing today does not involve spending resources from the future. It just transfers resources from one group to another within the current generation, and implies another transfer within a future generation.
3/5

What matters is whether or not the transfer today leaves the economy better off. If borrowing crowds out more productive spending and replaces it with less productive spending, the economy is worse off, but "crowding out" hasn't been a problem for decades.
Read 5 tweets
1 Dec
1/4

I am not an expert on the Australian economy, but I disagree with this article, which argues that the cost to Australia of a shutdown in China-Australia trade is much greater than other economists suggest because “the loss of Chinese...

theconversation.com/an-all-out-tra…
2/4

exports reduces the rate of return on investment in Australia, forcing financial markets to reallocate finance to other parts of the world.” This seems an argument that last made sense in the 19th and early 20th centuries, when the cost of capital was high and...
3/4

Australian investment was constrained by the scarcity of savings. But for many years, Australia, like every other advanced economy and some developing ones, has been flooded with cheap capital, and is likely to be well into the future. Economists seem unable to shake...
Read 4 tweets
30 Nov
1/8

Good article. According to Wang Min, the head of one of China’s large SOEs who is interviewed here, “The fall of state firms isn’t just a result of bad management, unclear strategy and inadequate entrepreneurship. It also has to do with government...

ft.com/content/157310…
2/8

mismanagement that puts [unreasonable] performance targets on these companies.”

This is a very important point with even more important – though not always understood – implications. As long as local governments, pressured by Beijing, try to generate levels of economic...
3/8

activity that exceed growth in the underlying economy, there simply is no way to prevent businesses from making bad investment decisions and lenders from making bad lending decisions. That is the only way to bridge the gap between what the economy can productively deliver...
Read 8 tweets
30 Nov
1/9

This very interesting article says “the message is clear among top policymakers: China must increase its middle class to avoid the middle income trap, where a developing country’s growth stagnates because of structural obstacles that impede...

scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/9

development". The plan is to double the size of the middle class (defined as households that earn $15,000-$75,000 a year) by 2035. The article then cites a senior think-tanker who makes the reasonable-sounding argument that “If China’s average annual GDP growth rate in...
3/9

the next 15 years can reach five per cent, and residents’ incomes can grow at roughly the same rate, China’s middle-income group will double.”

But this strikes me as the very circular thinking we almost always see in the late stages of investment-led growth...
Read 9 tweets
27 Nov
1/4

No, because the Eurodollar market is not an ethereal entity into which transactions disappear. It consists of real entities with real balance sheets that match. If the Japanese entity used the export revenues to purchase Eurodollar bonds issued by Repsol, for example, and...
2/4

Repsol used the funds to expand its operations in Libya, then Libyan investment would rise and Japan’s surplus would be balanced by a Libyan deficit – either with France or with some other country – against which foreign claims on Libyan assets will have increased.
3/4

If Japan on the other hand left its revenues in the form of deposits in a French bank – and it doesn’t matter whether these deposits are eurodollar deposits or in any other currency – the French bank would manage its balance sheet either by expanding assets or contracting...
Read 4 tweets
27 Nov
1/14

This very good article illustrates just how much confusion there is in understanding the accounting identities that describe the balance of payments. When a country saves more than it invests, there is no difference between its running a current...

economist.com/finance-and-ec…
2/14

account surplus and its running a capital account deficit: one doesn't "lead" to the other because they are simply the obverse sides of the same coin. In either case the country exports its excess savings in the form of real resources such as manufactured...
3/14

goods, commodities, services, etc., and gets paid with real claims on foreign assets. The former side of the transaction we call the current account surplus and the latter side we call the capital account deficit. Both sides simultaneously define the transaction.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!