To elaborate on the concept of superhuman vaccine immunity:
Each of the 3 examples in our piece are for different reasons. 1. HPV—best, since the human response is weak 2. Tetanus—small amounts of toxin don't elicit strong response) 3. H Flu—the bacterium is sugar coated
2/
This is different from vaccine efficacy.
Take measles. The natural human response to infection provides durable efficacy but the vaccine requires multiple shots and is without lifelong protection. 3/
Superhuman vaccine = superior to typical human response to natural infection
The #SARSCoV2 neutralizing antibody response to mRNA vaccines has exceeded that of many convalescent patients by orders of magnitude @NEJMbit.ly/33ys84T 4/
The natural human response to #COVID19 infection leaves many patients without a full and/or durable immune response, as nicely depicted (G=IgG, B=B cells, 4=CD4, 8=CD8, A=IgA) biorxiv.org/content/10.110… Figure 5C @profshanecrotty and colleagues 5/
Several #SARSCoV2 reinfections have been documented in patients without a sufficient IgG antibody response to the primary infection bnonews.com/index.php/2020… 6/
There are still many unknowns about the mRNA (and other platform) #SARSCoV2 vaccines with respect to durability, sterilization immunity (that would prevent transmission) and the role of T cells. 7/
In sum, the results to date suggest #SARSCoV2's spike protein lays the foundation for a potent vaccine-induced immune response that will turn out to be superior to that derived from natural infections. 8/
I recently spoke to @DrPaulOffit about the concept of a superhuman vaccine immune response medscape.com/viewarticle/93…
He highlighted the #SARSCoV2 inhibition of our interferon response and this point👇
And cited the 3 prototypic examples
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We've learned a lot more about the principal drivers of age-related diseases in the past few weeks. And that leads to a unified model to pull it all together. (open-access)
I review 4 new reports, summarized here: 1. The proteins from senescent cells predict age-related clinical outcomes 2. A new epigenetic age clock connects the dots between aging, the immune system, inflammation and lifestyle factors 3. People with a fast pace of aging had an increased risk of cognitive impairment, age-related diseases, disability, and mortality 4. The Importance of “Immune Resilience” for Healthspan
And present a unified I/I model for what we now know
Most people haven’t heard of this test, which is available in the US. It accurately predicts Alzheimer’s (not just if there’s a risk, but when). It is favorably affected by exercise and likely many other lifestyle factors.
Here’s (almost) everything we know about it. In Ground Truths (link in my profile d/t X-suppression)
A major @Nature paper this week found a significant decline in dementia after an outdated Shingles vaccine.
I've reviewed the study and many other relevant ones in a new Ground Truths (link in profile)
A Table from the post
The effect in the 2 natural experiments differed substantially by sex with the benefit predominant in women
The vaccine against Shingles helps protect against dementia, results of a natural experiment, adding to prior evidence
"implications are profound"
New @Nature nature.com/articles/s4158… nature.com/articles/d4158…
Of >105,000 participants with 30-year follow-up, only 9.3% achieved healthy aging (age 70, w/o any chronic diseases). Their diet was significantly associated with this outcome🧵 @NatureMedicine
These are the specific foods that were linked with healthy aging and other outcomes. Green-favorable; Red-unfavorable
Adherence to these diets (most to least in quintiles) linked to healthy aging
A paper on microplastics accumulating in the brain was just published @NatureMedicine, open-access
I review the background and major implications in a new Ground Truths edition (link in my profile)nature.com/articles/s4159…
The human brain:
—had 7-30 times more accumulation of microparticles (MPs) than the liver or kidney (organs with previously documented high propensity)
—from people with dementia had 5X accumulation of MPs compared with non-dementia
—there was a marked increase of accumulation over recent years