A telephone conference is about to begin in the Lev Parnas case.

I'll be following along remotely.
We're about to begin now.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicolas Roos for the govt.

Attorney Joseph Bondy appears for Lev Parnas.

Attorney Todd Blanche for Igor Fruman.

Attorney Gerald Lefcourt for Andrey Kukushkin.
U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken asks whether the parties consent to remote proceedings.

They do.
The defendants are about to be arraigned on the superseding indictment, which includes the alleged Fraud Guarantee scheme.

Prosecutor Roos described those charges.
Lev Parnas pleads not guilty to the superseding indictment.
Igor Fruman pleads not guilty to the superseding indictment.
Andrey Kukushkin pleads not guilty to the superseding indictment.
The fourth defendant, David Correia, previously pleaded guilty, without a cooperation agreement. lawandcrime.com/high-profile/l…
Status update from the government now on discovery.
Fruman's attorney Todd Blanche says it has been difficult to prepare for trial amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kukushkin's attorney Lefcourt echoes those remarks.

"I've long ago alerted you to our concern about the quantity of material."

He says it's not possible to prepare for trial without seeing your client in a conference room.
Lefcourt: The EDNY has shut down trials. Many other courts around the country have shut down trials.

"It's too dangerous to go to trial now. I worry about it."

He asks for adjournment of the motions and the trial date.
Lev Parnas' attorney Joseph Bondy agrees with his peers at the defense table about the challenges of preparing for trial in the age of COVID-19.
Bondy notes that there is some data suggesting pandemic-era juries have excluded the elderly, people of color and Latino populations.
Judge Oetken says he's "inclined" to move the trial again because "we're almost certainly not" going to get on the calendar for March 1, which was the date.

"I would be inclined to move the trial to a date that works for everybody."
Bondy questions the striking out of the allegations surrounding the plot against Marie Yovanovitch from the superseding indictment.
Bondy cited that "streamlining," as he said the government called it, as a reason to probe the grand jury process.

Background: Lev Parnas cooperated with the House Intelligence Committee's investigation into the plot against Yovanovitch at the heart of Trump's impeachment.
The government's new indictment excises that from the charges.

The hearing is adjourned.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

1 Dec
Covering the courts for more than a decade, this is the first time that I encountered a federal judge talking about a "Bribery-for-pardon scheme" in a heavily redacted document—or any document whatsoever. Image
There's a lot more to unpack here in my story going live shortly on @lawcrimenews, but for now, I will leave you with the regular admonition to #AlwaysReadTheFootnotes. Image
To dispel the inevitable howl of conspiracy theorists "Why is this coming out now?"—

The answer is simple and was given when the order was secretly issued on Aug. 28 this year:

Judge Howell gave the government 90 days to produce an unsealed version of his opinion. Image
Read 4 tweets
1 Dec
Bill Cosby's appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is about to begin.

Watch LIVE with me for @lawcrimenews lawandcrime.com/live-trials/li…
The Keystone State's Chief Justice Saylor calls the case.

Jennifer Bonjean is up first for Cosby, claiming the prosecution chose to indict her client's "entire life."

The crux of the appeal is the reliance of "prior bad act" evidence, other than the ones charged.
Bonjean argues this turned the case to a trial on Cosby's character.

Justice Dougherty questions Cosby's lawyer about why he didn't invoke his Fifth Amendment over a deposition.

Bonjean: "He believed that in order to not be prosecuted that this [was] part of the agreement."
Read 30 tweets
30 Nov
SCOTUS will hear the outgoing Trump admin's appeal of a unanimous three-judge ruling rejecting its memo attempting to exclude undocumented immigrants from census apportionment.

@NewYorkStateAG pointed to an ugly pedigree of redefining "persons."

Covering live, @LawCrimeNews
The Apportionment Clause:

"Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State..." constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/a…
Oyez, oyez, oyez.

Here we go: c-span.org/video/?477428-…
Read 37 tweets
26 Nov
"'Absolutely No Allegations of Any Fraud': Pa. Court Rejects Trump Campaign's Appeal Over 69 Mail-In Ballots," via @ColinKalmbacher lawandcrime.com/2020-election/… via @lawcrimenews
Generally, the replies to this headline fall into two categories:

1) Why was the Trump campaign challenging 69 ballots in Bucks County, Pa.?

2) "Nice."

Let's explain how the ballot challenge broke down to that number.
From today's ruling:

This was the number of ballots originally subject to the Trump campaigns challenge, broken down by category.

A Supreme Court of Pa. ruling in a separate-but-related case took care of the first three categories.

Team Trump withdrew 4 and 6.

Leaving...
Read 5 tweets
25 Nov
The Trump team heads to Gettysburg today in a flailing effort to flip its historical significance.
“Four Seasons and two-and-a-half weeks ago...” #TrumpCampaignAtGettysburg
Near the hallowed ground where thousands fought and died to turn the tide of the Civil War, Trump will enter a conference room of a Wyndham Hotel and peddle "voter fraud" lies that none of their lawyers has the courage to defend before a judge.
Read 4 tweets
24 Nov
Eric Garner's family has been fighting to order a judicial inquiry into his death.

A hearing in that case is about to begin before Justice Joan Madden.

Follow along.
Up first is @GideonOliver for the families.

The court previously ruled that the proceeding for an independent court inquiry into Mayor de Blasio and the city's conduct could move ahead.

Oliver notes that the city hasn't moved forward on its appeal.
Steven Kitzinger, the city's lawyer, said that the case "remains in limbo, in purgatory" because the judge denied the motion to dismiss but didn't grant the application for the summary inquiry.

Justice Madden: "I'm having a little trouble following your argument, Mr. Kitzinger."
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!