It's interesting that Neera Tanden's nomination to OMB has rattled conservatives more than any other proposed member of the administration and yet the Twitter Left has simultaneously declared this nomination as some kind of personal affront.
Sure, y'all, put on your full battle make-up to oppose someone who is already opposed by some in the right-wing of the Senate for being too progressive. I am sure this will result in someone more progressive as a nominee. Makes perfect sense.
Maybe, and I'm just spitballing here, if the GOP is opposed to Tanden b/c she is too progressive, your own attacks won't result in a more left-wing appointment. Given that the Senate--not pod-casters--makes these decisions, we might just end up w/ someone more conservative.
(sometimes when I say something is interesting, it is a polite way of actually saying I think it's boring but worth noting)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

1 Dec
I'm not sure if people realize this, but a lot of the plans that have come out of @amprog during Neera Tanden's tenure are to the left of Biden's platform. This includes their healthcare proposal.
CAP has also highlighted issues that too often go ignored. Their work on disability is extensive. Under Tanden's lead, they've also taken a very intersectional approach to economic policy. For an example:
americanprogress.org/issues/economy…
Overall, I would highly recommend looking at the work put out by CAP. The team is skilled at both describing the origins of weaknesses/disparities in our society & how to build solutions to these problems. Another example is their work on Early Childhood: americanprogress.org/issues/early-c… ImageImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
30 Nov
Some folks on the left sound remarkably like conservatives when they speak about race/gender and representation in positions of power.
The fallacies are certainly analogous. Conservatives attack affirmative action and other proposals for greater equality by arguing that liberals are placing race as a *more important* feature than qualifications. . . .
. . . .when, in fact, liberals are trying to fight systems of inequality that *prevent* people's qualifications from being recognized in some cases and/or form life-long barriers to the accumulation of qualifications in other cases.
Read 9 tweets
29 Nov
There is no moral difference if 55% or 45% of white women voted for Trump. That's either slightly > than half or slightly < than half that are complicit in white supremacy. If you see a white woman in the grocery store, there's around a 50% chance she voted for Trump either way.
There are, however, gigantic electoral consequences to these numbers. No woman who is white should seek emotional solace in 45% over 55%. It's close to 50% either way. But that is different than attempting to understand the behavior of the electorate, where a 10 pt diff matters.
And here's the thing: we have been told over the past 4 years that we have to throw away "identity politics" (Civil rights!) in order to win votes. The Biden campaign & the Democratic party didn't do that. They embraced diversity. And they won.
Read 6 tweets
28 Nov
This piece is not great. The data analysis is problematic. And not just in terms of white women, but also in terms of minority voters, which is an even more serious issue.
Let's look at the more serious issue first: The claim that Trump made gains with Black and Latino voters. The evidence that we have at this time is spotty, but I have seen very little that suggests Trump made gains with Black voters.
Trump does appear to have made gains w/ some sub segments of Latino voters, specifically voters of Cuban descent in Florida. Lenz correctly notes that Latinos are not a monolith, but then goes on to treat them as a monolith by extrapolating the S. FL gains to all Latinos.
Read 15 tweets
27 Nov
What is the best way to either protect against or fend off this attack, in which one side attacks the king side pawn with both a bishop and a knight? #chess
I have tried preemptively moving the knight to g3. I do not like sidelining him this way. But he does protect the pawn
I have also tried moving the bishop to e3.
Read 5 tweets
25 Nov
Just a quick fact check, here. This is not intended to defend the Obama admin's full legacy which is worthy of criticism in some areas & praise in others.

When deportations went up, Mayorkas was Director of USCIS, which is in charge of visas, green cards, etc, not deportations.
Mayorkas was Dep. Director of DHS in Obama's 2nd term, during which time he implemented DACA and deportations went down. This was due in large part to decreases in interior removals, which went on to increase under Trump
In any case, the Obama/Biden admin's record is very mixed, but, in terms of Mayorkas, his own tenure as Dep Dir of DHS is one that is marked by the rapid implementation of DACA, as well as a strong decline in interior deportations (individuals who are living in the U.S.)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!