WI Assembly Republicans released a bill that is theoretically a COVID-19 plan but in reality is a thinly-cloaked attempt to strip power from schools, local officials, and the Governor, and give that power to legislative leaders instead. 🧵
Let's start with schools. Under this bill, it would take a super-majority of the school board to approve online instruction, and even then, the approval would only be good for two weeks, at which point the board would have to re-approve online instruction.
Schools that provide online instruction would be punished by having their budgets cut. Madison would get a cut of around $10M, Milwaukee about $29M. How is cutting school budgets during a pandemic a helpful response?
Teachers that provide virtual instruction would have to do it from an *actual school building* (why?) unless they get a doctor's note, and even that exception goes away 60 days after a vaccine is widely available.
Now local officials. The bill would prohibit local health orders that tailor capacity restrictions for higher-risk types of businesses. Local safety restrictions on religious gatherings would seem to be prohibited altogether.
The bill would require approval by the legislature's budget committee to spend federal money related to COVID-19, and to set a plan for distribution of the vaccine. Right now the Governor has that ability, & does not need the legislature's say-so.
And speaking of the vaccine, this bill would prohibit employers from making getting a vaccine a condition of employment. For example, a nursing home could not require that its employees get the vaccine.
You read that right: the WI GOP Assembly believes that one of the things that would help Wisconsin in this time of crisis is to make it harder for employers to make sure their employees are vaccinated. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If the GOP Assembly wants to mitigate the effects of the pandemic, here are some things they SHOULD do:
* Accept federal money to expand BadgerCare
* Streamline applying for unemployment benefits
* Stop using courts to block public health orders
* Allow local govt's flexibility
Five (and a half) interesting items tucked into the budget requests of Wisconsin state agencies: bit.ly/2JsVnyV
1/ Downgrade marijuana possession to an ordinance violation for first and second offenses, misdemeanor for third offense. (Currently, possession is a misdemeanor for first offense, felony thereafter.) This would save the Public Defender's Office half a million dollars/yr.
2/ No tax credits for #Foxconn since they aren't fulfilling the terms of the contract. That frees up $424 million (!!) over two years in money taxpayers won't be putting in Foxconn's pocket.
WI Republican legislative leaders are holding millions of dollars in federal Medicaid and unemployment benefits hostage, as legislators try to force Gov Evers to cede some of his powers to the Republican-controlled legislature.
Thread. 1/n, sigh.
Recognizing the high costs of fighting the virus, the feds have made additional Medicaid funding available to states. In WI, the lame duck law blocks Gov Evers from taking steps to accept this $ without getting approval from the legislature. More:
Also, feds are newly offering to pay 100% of the cost of the first week of unemployment benefits. Currently, WI doesn't allow people to get benefits for the first week of unemployment, so both the gov and the leg would have to sign off on this change to get the add'l funding.
THREAD: How Wisconsin's lame duck law is hurting our capacity to fight the pandemic.
41 states that have submitted waivers to strengthen the capacity of their Medicaid programs to respond to the pandemic. WI isn't among them. Here's why.
1/n
Gov Evers proposed a waiver, but because of limits on executive power the Republican legislature made between the period Gov Evers was elected and when he took office, the full legislature now needs to explicitly approve the changes. And the full legislature hasn't met.
Changes proposed by Evers include:
* allowing in-person requirements to be waived
* suspending cost-sharing requirements
* temporarily making it easier for providers to get MA reimbursement
* waiving prior authorization requirements
* providing flexibility in MA enrollment
For our economy to work for everyone, Wisconsin needs to invest in strong communities. But WI has gone back on a commitment to providing resources to local governments, forcing them to implement taxes and fees that fall most heavily on residents with the lowest incomes. (1/7)
The biggest & most flexible source of state support to local govts, Shared Revenue, fell 47% between 1996 & 2020. (2/7)
In 1996, the state spent 11.5¢ out of every dollar in the budget on Shared Revenue, an amount that dropped to 4.5¢ out of every dollar by 2020. (3/7)
In wake of being named worst area for African-Americans (bit.ly/2OfA42H), Racine mayor talks about how the legacy of segregation continues into the current day. His comments reminded me of current-day efforts by the WI legislature to further segregate Racine schools. 1/9
In the 2017-19 budget, WI lawmakers included a provision to encourage wealthier, less racially diverse areas of the Racine district to break off and form their own separate districts, concentrating poorer students in the remaining portion. 2/9
If the Racine district scores low enough on the state's school district report cards, the provision REQUIRES villages in the district to hold referenda on forming their own separate school districts. Voters in the remaining portion of the Racine district would not get to vote. 3/
Wisconsin's Manufacturing & Ag Credit: Stay with me, I know it sounds boring, but if you look under the hood you can see one of the most skewed, ineffective tax cuts in WI. @GovWalker (pro) and @Tony4WI (con) have been speaking out about the credit...here are 6 things to know.
#1 The MAC (Manuf & Ag Credit) strips resources from important public priorities that are vital to the economic well-being of businesses and families. Big time, too -- to the tune of $1.4 billion over the last 7 years, and $334 million in this year alone.
#2 The MAC is a windfall for a select few. Most of the credit (76%) goes to millionaires, even though they make up just 0.2% of tax filers.