I'm listening to this craziness from the "Stop the Steal" Powell rally.
The very GA politicians who demanded that they have un-auditable touchscreens are now saying that they need traditional paper ballots--now only because they lost. 1/
2/ They claimed that they want a voting system that is made in the USA. I am not aware of one that does not have foreign made components. What do they plan to buy??

But GA can have 100% accurate trustworthy hand-marked paper ballots, and thoroughly audit the result.
3/ They claim that they will not vote on the Dominion machines.

They don't seem to understand that they can use the system they have and ditch the touchscreens, and use hand marked ballots and fully audit the tallies! All in public sight.
4/ Let's look at who in the GA House of Rep. voted to spend $150M on this un-auditable voting system in 2019.
They were told by dozens of top cybersecurity experts that it could not produce trustworthy results. But they WANTED a system with such weaknesses. Image
5/ Let's look at the Senators who demanded that GA voters must vote on a system that could not produce a trustworthy audit trail. Look at their votes in 2019 for the $150M package for the vulnerable complex system that defies accountability. Image
6/ Let's look at what the cybersecurity experts told Kemp's/ Raffensperger's committee on voting system in 2019. NOT TO BUY IT!
…altionforgoodgovernance.sharefile.com/d-sf58239918e3… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marilyn Marks #Hand_Marked_Ballots_Jan. Runoffs

Marilyn Marks #Hand_Marked_Ballots_Jan. Runoffs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarilynRMarks1

23 Nov
Join us @CoalitionGoodGv in asking St. Elec. Bd. to select hand marked paper ballots for the extremely important January election.
US Senate election should be conducted as an auditable defensible election. Can only be done with hand marked ballots. 1/
bit.ly/CGGtoSEB11_22
2/ The use of hand marked ballots should be desirable for both parties. Reduces avenues for fraud, hacking, and provides the ONLY way to have an auditable outcome.
75% of America votes on hand marked ballots. GA behind the times. New system uses old insecure technology.
3/ Please take a moment and write the State Board ---even a one liner---their meeting is at 8am tomorrow (Monday), but it will not be too late in the next couple of days for them to consider this.
Please write ASAP if you are interested in a secure US Senate election.
Read 4 tweets
22 Nov
1/ While the political world seems focused on the problematic Dominion Voting System's role in GA's elections, some facts rather than conspiracy theories might help all sides to come to a reasonable solution going forward. That is the point of this thread. #Dominion
2/ I'll start with the recommended solution for the Jan. 5 Senate runoffs and support it with the facts and rationale in the thread.
How do I know anything about this? We @CoalitionGoodGv have been suing in fed. court since Aug.2019 to have the system declared unconstitutional.
3/ Simple solution for Senate runoffs. Have a defensible verifiable election with hand marked paper ballots (HMPB) for all voters (exception for voters with disabilities.) No hackable, insecure touchscreen machines. Optical scan for immediate tabulation, then thorough audits.
Read 21 tweets
19 Nov
1/ Seems that @GaSecofState is hinting strongly that indeed Trump campaign will seek a recount now that Raffensperger's ridiculous "all-in-one" counting exercise got everyone warmed up.

I hope press will ask some hard questions about the exercise that is winding down and...
2/ Also seek more accurate information in this next round of ballot counting.
Too many reporters are just buying the SOS contractor's (Sterling's) glib lines without scrutiny.
I'll use this thread to pose some of those questions again.
3/ Knowing that Trump has the right to a recount, which could be a hand recount with a court order, why did SOS put the counties through this additional counting exercise and try to pretend it was legally authorized, calling it "all-in-one?"
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
1/ Lots of questions should be asked of @GaSecofState, and his GOP colleagues that just put the counties through an incredibly massive effort far from over....

-If you wanted a manual recount, why not seek a court order to get one (which is the law)?
2/ --If GOP wanted more representation in the counting process, why not have a legally compliant manual recount where one member was GOP at each counting table?

--If you wanted to have a manual count control official results, why didn't you conduct a hand recount?
3/ Since you know that you have to report official recount numbers by precinct, why did you use @voting_works non-transparent software Arlo which does not record precincts?
Why did you not have the counters record precinct counts?
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
Oops! @GaSecofState was just kidding about certifying the results of this massive politically motivated "recount/audit/re-tally/hand count."

He was finally forced to admit that he cannot use the expensive illicit process to change the vote count.
bit.ly/CGGsosCount 1/
2/ We @CoalitionGoodGv have been warning since before the counting exercise began that it could not be used as a recount, and could not change the tallies if errors were found.
@GaSecofState hid this information from 159 counties until yesterday, and forced this mess on them.
3/ We sent this letter to Fulton and other counties just after the counting exercise was announced. We've urged the press to demand answers.
It was obvious from the beginning that this was a political game and the counties would pay the price.
bit.ly/CGGhandcount
Read 23 tweets
16 Nov
1/ GA press and voters--
If you want to do your own ballot count to compare to the hand count result--insist that the counties make the scan images from the original election public. Here's what they look like.

Crowdsource the counting effort.
2/ They are clearly public records under GA law.
There is nothing "secret" about them. The only "names" on the ballots are candidate names.
3/ Hey, @AJC, remember when the @StarTribune published online scans of all the ballots in the Franken-Coleman recount? Please do that before the final state certification puts them under seal.

Voters were encourage to review for themselves.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!