Incidentally, here's a useful example in how to frame an almost entirely party-line vote. This, from the WaPo, is correct: washingtonpost.com/powerpost/hous…
The NYT's framing, conversely, is extremely misleading, especially since you need to read all the way to the 14th graf to discover that the number of Republicans in this "bipartisan" coalition is "5" nytimes.com/2020/12/04/us/…
The Times article does have some useful detail about the Democratic bill, but also omits the derisive remarks of the Republican leadership of both houses (which would further make clear that "bipartisan" is not the right label here)
It would have been useful for the Post to note here that House Democrats passed a comprehensive relief bill in May and McConnell has passed nothing and has yet to even seriously negotiate, but you can't have everything
This is an excellent point: a major reason for Republican opposition is that the Dem bill expunges criminal records of people convicted for federal marijuana crimes
"Everyone who merits consideration for work in a future Democratic administration, please step forward. No, no, no, just remain right where you are, Mr. Katyal."
The idea that you have to treat clients chosen by big-time Supreme Court appellate lawyers like they're public defenders is some truly intelligence-insulting stuff, and that goes double when you tell public lies about judicial nominees you hope will favor your unsavory clients
"Would you agree that everyone is entitled to a criminal defense attorney irrespective if their ability to pay? Then surely you agree that deep-pocketed corporations who don't want to be held liable for child slavery should be able to get the precise lawyer of their choice."
Comrade Hawley continues to focus on the material needs of the working class by [checks notes] defending symbolic support for treason in defense of slavery and lawlessness in defense of apartheid
Glad we can all agree on which public officials have the greatest influence on the contemporary Republican Party, though
The following is a comprehensive list of the policies Hawley supports that would help ordinary workers:
I can't wait for the longform piece about the decision to trade up to draft Trubisky we will inevitably get when Pace and Nagy get fired after the season
This is amazing stuff. Sure Trubisky was by far the least accomplished of the 3 QBs, and he didn't have more impressive physical skills either, but he DROVE A '97 CAMRY HE IS NO GLORY BOY
The key thing to understand is that the libertarian cranks who have long dominated Republican policy don't just disdain empirical evidence, they treat self-serving back-of-a-napkin "models" as if they *were* empirical evidence dorfonlaw.org/2020/11/richar…
It was always inevitable that Trump was going to govern as a more-orthodox-than-Reagan Reaganite, because Trumpism is just the purest distillation of Reaganism
Caldwell, who had BEEN TO A SUPER BOWL as a HC and WON a Super Bowl as an OC with Joe Flacco at QB and had two winning seasons in 3 years with a bad organization, ranks 20th. Gase, coming off one year with a negative point differential, is the next Belichick.
Pelosi passed a second $3 trillion relief package in May you bootlicking hack
And yes what a mystery why a relief bill isn't passing with Biden as the president-elect I wonder what could explain it
Needless to say, if Democrats took McConnell's feeble corporate immunity-for-almost-nothing offer he would be screaming about how they're neoliberal sellouts.