.@WHO: “At present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID- 19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.”
The a look at what @WHO lists as the “advantages” of healthy people:
“The likely advantages of the use of masks by healthy people in the general public include:
• reduced potential exposure risk from infected persons
before they develop symptoms;
• reduced ‘potential stigmatization’ of individuals wearing masks to prevent infecting others (source control) or of people caring for COVID-19 patients in non-clinical settings;
• making people feel they can play a role in contributing to stopping spread of the virus;
• reminding people to be compliant with other measures (e.g., hand hygiene, not touching nose and mouth). However, this can also have the reverse effect (see below);
• potential social and economic benefits. Amidst the global shortage of surgical masks and PPE, encouraging the public to create their own fabric masks may promote individual enterprise and community integration.
• Moreover, the production of non-medical masks may offer a source of income for those able to manufacture masks within their communities.
• Fabric masks can also be a form of cultural expression, encouraging public acceptance of protection measures in general.”
The advantages of healthy people *wearing masks*, I should have said.
.@WHO: “The likely disadvantages of the use of mask by healthy people in the general public include:
• potential increased risk of self-contamination due to the manipulation of a face mask and subsequently touching eyes with contaminated hands;
• potential self-contamination that can occur if non- medical masks are not changed when wet or soiled. This can create favourable conditions for microorganism to amplify;
• potential headache and/or breathing difficulties, depending on type of mask used;
• potential development of facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis or worsening acne, when used frequently for long hours;
• difficulty with communicating clearly;
• potential discomfort;
• a false sense of security, leading to potentially lower
adherence to other critical preventive measures such as
physical distancing and hand hygiene;
• poor compliance with mask wearing, in particular by
young children;
• difficulty communicating for deaf persons who rely on
lip reading;
• disadvantages for or difficulty wearing them, especially for children, developmentally challenged persons, those with mental illness, elderly persons with cognitive impairment, those with asthma or chronic respiratory or breathing problems,
• disadvantages for those who have had facial trauma or recent oral maxillofacial surgery, and those living in hot and humid environments.”
This is what @WHO recommends the state mini-tyrants do prior to recommending masks for the general public:
“The decision-maker should:
• continue gathering scientific data and evidence on the effectiveness of mask use in non-health care settings;
Nope, they don’t do this.
• evaluate the impact (positive, neutral or negative) of using masks in the general population (including behavioral and social sciences).
Nope, they don’t do this, either.
*””The decision of governments and local jurisdictions whether to recommend or make mandatory the use of masks should be also based on the local context, culture, availability of masks, resources required, AND PREFERENCES OF THE POPULATION.”
Nope, they CERTAINLY don’t do this.
Show of hands:
When did your local/state government last ask YOU what YOUR preferences are on being required to wear a mask, or your opinion about being fined and/or jailed for not wearing masks? 🤔
The @WHO is inept and corrupt and I’m ecstatic they’re not going to be getting any more of our $$.
They just accidentally told the truth here.
Who knew scientists consider it a benefit for healthy people to wear masks because then they will help others not feel stigmatized for wearing a mask? Or because by them wearing a mask, they can remind others to be “compliant,” with the mask mandates.
And of course-healthy people wearing masks will encourage community integration. Then, we can wear masks to help those who lost their jobs due to lockdowns earn money by making masks.
This is how vital scientists believe mask-wearing by healthy people is to saving lives.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“There was never an announcement made to the media and other observers about the counting being over for the night and them needing to leave, according to Frances Watson, chief “investigator” for @GaSecofState ...”
“She said they just followed the ‘cutters’ as they left.”
She also said:
“Nobody told them to stay. Nobody told them to leave. Nobody gave them any advice on what they should do.”
Biden “falsely claims the Iran nuclear deal that the Obama/Biden administration negotiated has kept Americans safe. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was flawed in many ways.
For starters, it failed to do anything about Iran's terrorist activities, which is significant considering they are the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world and a leading cyber threat.
Doug Band, Bill Clinton’s second-term “body man” and creator of the Clinton Global Initiative, says in Vanity Fair that the former president visited Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous private island. vanityfair.com/news/2020/12/c…
Band divulges that @HillaryClinton initially turned down Barack Obama’s entreaty to serve as secretary of state until Bill convinced her otherwise: “She was bitter, angry, and believed he didn’t deserve to be president.”
He claims that @ChelseaClinton tried to shake him down for an equity stake in a company he founded. Band tells Vanity Fair, “I thought she was kidding or deeply sick.”
An audit of 1,440 Nevada mail-ballots suggests that 2 percent of the ballots were cast on behalf of voters who never received a ballot in the mail and one percent cast on behalf of voters who said did not vote at all.
Baselice and Associates conducted the audit for the legal team representing the Trump campaign in Nevada. The firm called up the voters identified on each mail ballot. The findings suggest that 3% of the ballots were cast by someone other than the person identified on the ballot.
@ericgarcetti orders residents to stay home and businesses that require in-person work to cease operations as he says the city comes “close to a devastating tipping point" on Covid-19 lamayor.org/sites/g/files/…
“Failure to comply with this Order shall constitute a misdemeanor subject to fines and imprisonment. I hereby urge the Los Angeles Police Department and the City Attorney to vigorously enforce this Order via Sections 8.77 and 8.78 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.
Additionally, individuals, businesses, and properties which fail to comply with this Order may be subject to having their utility services shut off by the Department of Water and Power.
The president said that “tens of thousands [of ballots] have fraudulent signatures” in key states.
It means “a full forensic audit is required to ensure that only legal ballots from lawfully registered voters that were properly cast are included.”
“The reason for this is clear,” he said, “they were not verifying signatures because they know the ballots have not been filled out by the voters in whose names they were cast.”