Love this! @JoeriRogelj asked me for a debunk of Golf vs e-Golf and @ThomasGibon provided it immediately!

He shows the result using realistic diesel consumption and production. Thx Thomas!

But the article is about the ID.3.
And the ID.3 rocks! (thread)
First the problems: in an article that touts the carbon neutral production of the ID.3, @volkswagen puts a comparison chart with an eGolf that has extremely high carbon production emissions. Not smart. I would replace it with an ID.3 based chart asap.
volkswagenag.com/en/news/storie…
And while you are at it I would also cut/improve second 8 to 14 of the accompanying video because why bother telling lies about how much CO2 is emitted by the petrol and diesel Golf when you have such a strong story about the electric vehicle?
What goes wrong in the Golf-eGolf comparison is the same as with the @PolestarCars 2 LCA that I criticized last week and that turned into #Astongate/#Boschgate.

Taking 'official' WLTP measurements that we know are wrong makes the electric car looks bad.
So I think carmakers and journalists have to make up their mind: do they want to communicate official numbers that everybody knows are incorrect, or do they want to communicate reality?

In plain language: please stop lying!
(Here I tell that on TV.)
The advantage of the eGolf becomes even larger than what Thomas demonstrates, if we estimate the electricity mix of the electric car over its lifetime.

Basically the electricity becomes cleaner as time goes on and hence the electric car becomes cleaner.
But enough complaining: what REALLY impresses me is the length to which @volkswagen went to make the ID.3 production low carbon: their own company in the EU, optimizing all processes, and buying green energy all the way and offsetting the rest.

Respect!
volkswagenag.com/en/news/storie…
So yes, @volkswagen should use real world fuel consumption and production, and use electricity over the lifetime of the vehicle.

BUT, they've gone to great lengths to reduce the carbon footprint of the ID.3: this might be the most environmentally friendly EV that money can buy.
I think on this front it's now a race between @volkswagen and @Tesla. They are both cleaning up production at an impressive pace. If they keep this competition up for a few more years it will have an enormous positive impact on the production process.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AukeHoekstra

AukeHoekstra Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AukeHoekstra

5 Dec
What's the point of cultured meat when we can eat vegetables?

What's the point of renewables when we can use less energy?

Or of electric bikes when we can walk?

Well maybe decrease global warming, animal suffering, and zoonotic disease?
amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I get so sick and tired of people postulating "If everybody changed their behavior we wouldn't need sustainable innovation."

Well, unless you have a magic wand to change everybody's behavior, you are not helping. And even if you had you would lack respect for others.
Author @jennykleeman is now saying 'I didn't write the headline'. But the headline captures her article perfectly. She mentions none of the aforementioned problems and concentrates on yuck and how cultured meat can't be trusted by implying Singapore is an inferior country. Uhg.
Read 6 tweets
29 Nov
Thread with tweets I refer to often.

First my studies showing EVs are really much better

Article Joule

CO2 study with Prof Steinbuch avere.org/wp-content/upl…

Us in Der Spiegel

Transport & Environment tool
Then some debunks of articles that exaggerate CO2 emissions by electric vehicles (EVs) in the British press.

Let's start with #AstonGate.
I show EVs emit less after 16k miles (not 50k).
Michael shows bad intentions.
There was a whole host of this nonsense. Here's a debunk of nonsense in the Spectator


The Global Warming Policy Foundation is behind much of the FUD. Here's a back and forth
thegwpf.org/content/upload…

Deep dive into oil production
Read 12 tweets
29 Nov
From #dieselgate you may know that carmakers get away with untruthful tests in the EU.

That's important for both scientists and consumers.

Here I explain on Dutch TV @kassa_bnnvara how these lies made taxi drivers buy the wrong EV:
bnnvara.nl/kassa/videos/5…

But there's more!
But it's not just bad for immigrant taxi drivers who see their entire livelihood threatened by the lies because they buy an electric vehicle with too little range and slow fast charging. It also leads to many more people dying of exhaust.
And finally it leads to combustion vehicles seemingly emitting less exhaust which in turn leads to newspaper stories claiming it takes 50k miles for an EV to emit less when it's already closer to 16k miles (and getting less all the time).
Read 7 tweets
27 Nov
New 'study' claims it takes 48k miles for electric vehicles to emit less CO2 than gasoline cars.

But it's just a misleading brochure.
Reality is closer 16k miles.

UK media including @thetimes where mislead by this carmaker-paid attack on @BorisJohnson's green plans. (thread) Image
About me:

I research electric vehicles at @TUeindhoven and direct NEONresearch.nl.

Comparing CO2 emissions of electric vehicles and combustion cars is my specialty.

My paper describing common errors: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

A recent report:
avere.org/wp-content/upl… Image
Here is @thetimes @GraemePaton reporting on 'a study commissioned by vehicle and technology companies' where 'researchers recorded results'.
thetimes.co.uk/article/electr…

And there's literally dozens of others who fell for this. ImageImageImage
Read 29 tweets
27 Nov
There's a study financed by EV sceptics Bosch, Honda, McLaren and Aston Martin doing the round, partly based on a study saying a Polestar takes 50k miles to emit less CO2.

Will debunk it this evening but could people maybe add links to places where it pops up?
And about daily mail. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
Read 4 tweets
27 Nov
@MLiebreich @Joost57437492 Everybody (well maybe 12 people so far) is asking me to debunk this article in the times. The problem: I don't know which study they are talking about. Can twitter help
thetimes.co.uk/article/electr…
Polestar published some numbers on it's study in september polestar.com/dato-assets/11…
and if I look at the @thetimes article they copy the numbers from that study. I briefly talk about that comparison here:
Main problems with this Polestar study:

1) The XC40 of parent company Volvo uses 45% more petrol than Polestar assumes if you take reality instead of WLTP.

2) The Polestar itself (not the battery) already emits 3 tonnes more. (Build next to a coal plant?)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!