1/ Genericized Impermanent Loss Insurance - A new proposed financial primitive for bootstrapping AMM markets
2/ Last year, @synthetix_io pioneered liquidity mining - the model of incentivizing liquidity in markets via paying rewards to LPs in @UniswapProtocol and @CurveFinance
Rewards are streamed through the "mintr contract" which has become a mainstay of liquidity mining programs
3/ Liquidity mining allowed new projects to disintermediate centralized exchanges and market makers and bootstrap their own liquidity - saving significant time & resources for projects with many other positive externalities
4/ IL Insurance can serve as both a complement and/or substitute for traditional liquidity mining programs
5/ Mechanics
- Project commits X tokens to IL insurance contract where LPs deposit their tokens
- Variable: duration of insurance
- Minimum staking period before insurance takes effect
- % of IL insured (can use curve based on time staked)
- bidirectional or unidirectional
6/ IL can be calculated entirely onchain by looking at the LP token mix at time of LPTokenDeposit and LPTokenWithdraw
7/ Minimum staking period is important to set to deter manipulators from purposefully causing IL in order to take advantage of insurance payouts.
Small pools dominated by single parties maybe prone to manipulation
8/ Having the insurance be unidirectional allows liquidity incentivization in a more capital efficient way
This is because most LPs are significantly more concerned about losing upside exposure than IL from token price reduction (they get more tokens that they're bullish on)
9/ The benefit of an IL insurance contract is that it can conceivably incentivize liquidity for a fraction of the cost of traditional liquidity mining programs which are quite expensive for projects and not frequently conducted at scale on a long term basis
10/ an IL insurance contract could serve as a template for any projects pursuing liquidity mining in the future similar to that of the mintr contract
11/ Many models of IL insurance have already previously been discussed
H/T @Bancor which has IL insurance built into its v2.1 protocol
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Algorithmic stablecoins seem primed to explode this coming year similar to how oracles ( $LINK, $BAND, etc) had a great past year
2/ Stablecoins have achieved product-market fit at a mind-blowing scale - with demand for stables pushing total supply into the tens of billions and still exponentially expanding
They're used as SOVs (Eurodollar 2.0) and MoEs in & outside crypto
3/ The issue with current stablecoins is that they are not truly censorship-resistant. They can be shut down & represent a weak link in our DeFi ecosystems.
What's desperately needed are truly decentralized stablecoins. These can make DeFi applications truly unstoppable
Pretty cool to see a project that originally raised $130M (and never launched) ended up being launched by anon devs with 0 funding with a few months of dev work
Goes to show how excessive some of these fundraises in crypto actually were
That being said, I think it's well accepted that the Basis model doesn't actually work in a real world setting
Cool experiment and I think algorithmic stablecoins will be a pretty hot category this year, but imo there are better ones out there
Also, these capped farm launches are pretty dumb. The intent is to improve distribution, but funds that have inhouse developer resources just end up eating all the cake
The first such asset to simultaneously serve as a Store of Value (SOV), stablecoin and a speculative asset
An incredibly asymmetric and reflexive opportunity
2/ Stablecoins were the first crypto products that achieved product-market fit at scale after Bitcoin
Stablecoin growth is currently parabolic (USDT alone approaching $20B) and will be the first crypto sector to achieve mass adoption
3/ So we're all bullish on stablecoins, but traditionally it's been very difficult to gain exposure to their growth
- Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) are private companies whose shares trade extremely thinly OTC
- $MKR is a poor proxy of DAI growth (DAI up, MKR sideways)