UPDATE: We've been clamoring to see the vaccine data for months. That will finally happen on Tuesday (December 8), when Pfizer’s info is released to the public. Here are some things I’ll be looking for that were not revealed in press releases: 1/
1. What do we know about the memory T cells of vaccinated volunteers? There’s been a shift in thinking on the role of these immune cells. They may be more important for protection than neutralizing antibodies, which have previously been the focus. 2/
2. Most major adverse events appear within 6-8 weeks of vaccination. (Minor events have a different timeline). After tens of thousands of vaccinations, there does not appear to be a common, severe side effect associated with this vaccine. What about uncommon events? 3/
Why this matters: The first rotavirus vaccine was associated with a rare, severe event: intussusception (bowel blockage). It wasn't statistically significant & the vaccine was approved. Soon after, blockage became more common and the vaccine was withdrawn.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
So, back to COVID: Are there rare side effects associated with mRNA vaccines we should be aware of? And should those events impact whom we choose to initially vaccinate? Note: These vaccines do not, as some suggest, alter your genetic code. (They don't enter the nucleus).
3. Symptomatic disease looks to be less common in Pfizer’s study than in the general population, even in the placebo group. (Perhaps volunteers are the type to wear masks & social distance). Are there details about volunteers that could limit the generalizability of the data?
4. What happens after one dose of the vaccine? (Pfizer requires two). What happens if the second dose is given later than intended? How much leeway do we have? The real world is messy, and soon we'll be fielding these questions.
Takeaway: I expect the advisory committee to recommend emergency authorization with the caveat that people should consider individual risks and benefits before taking the vaccine. Many will then turn to their doctors for guidance. (I hope?).
Soon, we'll know what to tell them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt McCarthy

Matt McCarthy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrMattMcCarthy

8 Dec
UPDATE: I've been digging through Pfizer's vaccine data. It's incredibly encouraging and frankly, I'm stunned that this was all done in one year.
The FDA's advisory panel will review this data publicly on Thursday. You can check it out here: 1/
fda.gov/media/144245/d…
mRNA vaccines are described as new (there aren't any on the market) but they've been studied for decades. Pfizer has overcome the challenges limiting their use, including: 1) instability of free RNA in the body, 2) unintended inflammatory outcomes, & 3) mild immune responses. 2/
It's also reassuring that Moderna had such similar topline results using the same mRNA platform. This doesn't appear to be an aberrant outcome.
If there's one thing I'd like to know more about from Pfizer's data, it's at the bottom of page 43:  3/
Read 5 tweets
8 Dec
COVID Question I've been wrestling with: How does Pfizer's vaccine actually work? There are plenty of explainers out there, but they don't give a complete picture of what's happening inside the human body. Here's what we know and what we don't: 1/
Pfizer & Moderna have created COVID vaccines using a novel platform: messenger RNA (mRNA). When one of these vaccines is injected into your arm, your cells take up the mRNA & use it to make a coronavirus spike protein.
Note: You are NOT getting injected with the full virus. 2/
Spike protein is the part of coronavirus that's responsible for binding to human cells. When your immune system sees it, a cascade of immune responses are initiated, including antibody production, that ultimately provides you with protection.  3/
Read 8 tweets
7 Dec
COVID question: "Should people avoid Tylenol after vaccination?"
Fever is an expected side effect of mRNA vaccines & the reflex is to treat it. But treating fever can, in some cases, dampen the immune response.
When a patient gets a post-vaccination fever, what should we do? 1/
For most of the #COVID19 trials, volunteers were allowed to use temperature-lowering medications (antipyretics) after vaccination. This is understandable; fever is uncomfortable and, in rare cases, can be dangerous. 2/
But most of the time it's not. Fever is an adaptive response. It helps the immune system optimize performance. B cells make some antibodies more efficiently at higher temperatures. Treating a post-vaccination fever might be a mistake. 3/
chop.edu/news/journals-…
Read 6 tweets
6 Dec
COVID question I've been getting: Why do I need a vaccine when there's a 99.7% survival rate? It's a fair point (and makes for a lively discussion!).
Here is my response: 1/
Survival is an important metric, but it's the wrong one to focus on. Coronavirus is different than anything we have seen before. It causes strokes, it inflames blood vessels. It alters your sense of smell because it gets into your brain. It causes oxygen levels to plunge and.. 2/
you might not even feel it. It causes symptoms that last for months and we don't know why. When someone contracts the virus, I'm not just worried about survival. 3/
Read 6 tweets
5 Dec
UPDATE: I’ve been asked to provide guidance to some doctors who are trying to figure out: 1) whether to take a #COVID19 vaccine issued under emergency authorization and 2) what to recommend to their patients.
Here’s my approach:  1/
On December 10, I'll watch the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee discuss Pfizer's data. I have many questions about subgroup efficacy, safety, & memory T cells. I’m confident those will be addressed. Then, fighting the urge to do something, I’ll wait. 2/
We’ll do it all again on December 17th when the same panel meets to discuss Moderna’s data. After that, I’ll speak with colleagues, compare notes, and hash out a recommendation. I'll explain the rationale and my level of confidence in that recommendation. 3/
Read 6 tweets
4 Dec
The controversial argument to continue placebo-controlled vaccine trials after emergency authorization hinges on this idea: The obligations researchers have to volunteers in a trial are distinct from the obligations that physicians have to their patients. 1/
Researchers must always ensure that placebo-controlled trials remain ethically appropriate, and that takes into account a variety of factors, including local transmission rates and individual risk profiles (volunteer age, medical conditions). 2/
The case for continuing these trials is laid out here by NIH bioethicists: science.sciencemag.org/content/early/…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!