This idea that you can't highlight problems without offering a solution is pervasive, harmful, and false.

Efforts to accurately identify, analyze, & understand risks & harms are valuable. And most difficult problems are not going to be solved in a single paper.
I strongly believe that in order to solve a problem, you have to diagnose it, and that we’re still in the diagnosis phase of this... Trying to make clear what the downsides are, and diagnosing them accurately so that they can be solvable is hard work -- @JuliaAngwin WHAT’S WRONG WITH AI JA: I strongly believe that in order
With industrialization, we had 30 yrs of child labor & terrible working conditions. It took a lot of journalist muckraking & advocacy to diagnose the problem & have some understanding of what it was, and then the activism to get laws changed

We're in a 2nd machine age now. WHAT’S WRONG WITH AI JA: I strongly believe that in order
Above two quotes are from this interview with @JuliaAngwin, who has done crucial investigative reporting on algorithmic bias & other harms of tech companies, including the 2016 ProPublica investigation into the COMPAS recidivism algorithm

fastcompany.com/90337954/who-c…
Back to @JeffDean, the idea that a conference-peer-reviewed paper on ethical risks should be retracted for not being positive enough is so extreme as to seem almost like parody, "we don't talk about problems, only solutions." How will you know & understand those problems?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Thomas

Rachel Thomas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @math_rachel

4 Dec
I know about diversity-washing, I know about the empty lip-service. But I still can't get past the contrast between @JeffDean's tweets (h/t @EricaJoy) and his treatment of @timnitGebru-- never having a conversation with her, not telling her manager, denying her DEI experience,... Tweets from Jeff Dean sayin...Tweet from Jeff Dean: congr...
He didn't offer to have a single conversation with her

Read 5 tweets
3 Dec
I have long admired @timnitGebru for her brilliance, moral courage, clear voice in speaking up for what is right, & influential scholarship. It is truly terrible that Google would do this.

In this thread, I want to share some of Timnit's work I love

I've quoted "Datasheets for Datasets" (2018) in many of my talks & assign it as reading in my class. It highlights decisions that go into creating & maintaining datasets, and how standardization & regulation came to other industries

arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010
Timnit worked with @jovialjoy on the original GenderShades research, which has had a profound impact on facial recognition, led to concrete regulations, and changed our industry

Read 18 tweets
1 Dec
Reciprocity is a key part of life. Surveillance undermines reciprocity. Every time we opt for surveillance or extractive technology, we undermine reciprocity and relationship. -- @doxtdatorb #AgainstSurveillance
Between 1971-1974, a Detroit Police Department surveillance unit called STRESS (Stop The Robberies, Enjoy Safe Streets) fatally shot 24 people, 22 of them African-American @hypervisible #AgainstSurveillance
Teach-in Against Surveillance is happening now, with livestream:
eventbrite.com/x/teach-in-aga…
Read 9 tweets
1 Dec
A freelance journalist in Vietnam w/ 150,000 followers & a verified Facebook account realized all his posts about a high-profile death penalty case had vanished with no notification

amnesty.org/en/latest/news… Content removed without any...
“Imagine if you spent years & years growing your Facebook account, but then in one easy act, Facebook just erases all your work"

Facebook has blocked every post a pro-democracy activist has tried to post about Communist Party, with no option to appeal Nguyen Van Trang, a pro-dem...
More background in this LA Times article:
latimes.com/world-nation/s…
Read 7 tweets
19 Nov
There has been some great work on framing AI ethics issues as ultimately about power.

I want to elaborate on *why* power imbalances are a problem. 1/
*Why* power imbalances are a problem:
- those most impacted often have least power, yet are the ones to identify risks earliest
- those most impacted best understand what interventions are needed
- often no motivation for the powerful to change
- power tends to be insulating 2/
The Participatory Approaches to ML workshop at #ICML2020 was fantastic. The organizers highlighted how even many efforts for fairness or ethics further *centralize power*

3/
Read 11 tweets
18 Nov
My impression is that some folks use machine learning to try to "solve" problems of artificial scarcity. Eg: we won't give everyone the healthcare they need, so let's use ML to decide who to deny.

Question: What have you read about this? What examples have you seen?
It's not explicitly stated in this article, but seems to be a subtext that giving everyone the healthcare they need wasn't considered an option:

To be clear, if the starting point is artificial scarcity of resources, this is a problem machine learning CAN'T solve
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!