GET A GRIP Profile picture
Dec 7, 2020 31 tweets 16 min read Read on X
A THREAD on disturbing fascist tendencies in Britain, which should concern us all.

Cosmopolitan conservatives often support international cooperation & admired elite culture in other countries, but throughout history, Fascists espouse extreme nationalism & cultural parochialism.
Fascist ideologues teach that national identity is the foundation of individual identity & should not be corrupted by foreign influences, especially if they are left-wing.

For example, Nazism condemned Marxist & liberal internationalisms as threats to German national unity.
Fascists in general want to replace internationalist class solidarity with nationalist class collaboration.

Unlike democratic conservatives, fascists accuse their political opponents of being less “patriotic” than they, sometimes even labeling them “traitors.”
In France, immigrants - particularly left-wing ones - were special targets of fascist nationalism.

Jean Renaud demanded that all foreigners seeking residence in France be rigorously screened & that the unfit be denied entry “without pity”.
Scapegoating

Fascists often blamed their countries’ problems on scapegoats: Jews, Marxists, and immigrants were prominent among the groups that were demonized - groups which Farage has regularly demonized & scapegoated for at least a decade.
Fascists praised the Volk (the people as an ethnic or national group) & pandered to populist anti-intellectualism.

Fascists encourage anti-intellectualism, which we see playing out especially in the dismissal of experts & a range of humanities & sociological theories.
Unlike left-wing populism, fascist populism doesn't suggest workers’ hardships may be to do with big business or the grotesquely wealthy, does not advocate progressive taxation, higher workers' pay, union rights, or the right to strike, & it spares the wealth of the upper class.
Fascists pander to antiurban feelings. Just like UKIP & the @Conservatives, the Nazis won most of their electoral support from rural areas & small towns.

In Nazi propaganda the ideal German was a simple peasant, & intellectualism was considered a threat to the Volk soul.
Jews were often portrayed & condemned as quintessential city dwellers. Romanian fascism relied heavily on the support of landed peasants who distrusted the “wicked” city. The agrarian wing of Japanese fascism praised the peasant soldier & denigrated the industrial worker.
Under fascist regimes women are urged to perform traditional gender role as wives & mothers & to bear many children for the nation.

Mussolini severely restricted women’s access to jobs outside the home & the Nazis forbade female party members from giving orders to male members.
Although not all fascists believed in biological racism, it plays a central role in the actions of those who did.

Nazism was viciously racist, especially in its attitude toward Jews.

Contemporary references to 'Cultural Marxism' amplify antisemitic conspiracy theories.
Fascist movements in Poland, Spain, Portugal, France, Austria, Hungary, Croatia, Bolivia, Argentina, Chile, and Brazil all portrayed themselves as defenders of Christianity and the traditional Christian family against atheists and amoral humanists.
Many non-German fascists were just as nationalistic toward their countries as Hitler was toward his.

Fascist Italy & fascist Japan were allies of Germany during the war, & members of the British Union of Fascists & the German-American Bund, expressed admiration for Hitler.
Many fascist ideas derived from the reactionary backlash to the progressive French revolutions of 1789, 1830, 1848 (across Europe), & 1871 and to the secular liberalism & social radicalism that accompanied these upheavals.
Racial Darwinists such as Vogt, Haeckel, Treitschke, Langbehn, Lagarde, & Chamberlain glorified the survival of the fittest, scolded humanitarians for attempting to protect the racially unfit, and rejected the idea of social equality.
HS Chamberlain saw no reason to give inferior races equal rights. Treitschke raged against progressive values of #democracy, #socialism, & #feminism (now replaced by "woke"), insisted that might made right, & praised imperialism (“Brave peoples expand, cowardly peoples perish”).
John Weiss noted that “the press & popular magazines of Germany & Central Europe had fed a steady diet of racial nationalism to the public since the last quarter of the nineteenth century, & anti-Semitic stereotypes were nothing if not commonplace in German mass culture.”
Despite their long history in European thought, fascist ideas prospered politically only when perceived economic threats increased their appeal to members of certain social groups.

In 1928, before the Great Depression in Germany, Hitler received less than 3% of the vote.
The economic anxiety underlying the success of Nazism was reflected to some extent in party membership, which was drawn disproportionately from economic elites and other high-status groups—especially for leadership positions.
Although in principle there were significant differences between fascism & nonfascist conservatism, the two camps shared many of the same goals, which in times of crisis led some non-fascists to collaborate with fascists.
“Any study of fascism which centers too narrowly on the fascists & Nazis alone may miss the true significance of right-wing extremism... aristocratic landlords, army officers, Govt & civil service officials, & important industrialists" helped bring fascists to power. (Weiss).
During the Great Depression, thousands of middle-class conservatives fearful of the growing power of the Left abandoned traditional right-wing parties & adopted fascism.

The ideological distance traveled from traditional conservatism to Nazism was sometimes small.
In Italy thousands of landowners & businessmen were grateful to Mussolini’s Blackshirts for curbing the socialists in 1920–21, & many in the army and the Catholic church saw fascism as a bulwark against communism.
In the 2010s, right-wing populist & neofascist parties & movements have enjoyed a surge of popularity.

In Germany in 2017, the far-right party Alternative for Germany which adopted an overtly anti-Islamic platform, became the second most popular political party in Germany.
Following WWII, scholars of fascism adopted various terms to describe some contemporary political parties & leaders who were not clearly fascist/neofascist but who displayed some characteristics of historical fascist movements & regimes, for example Trump, Farage & Johnson.
Farage, Trump, Johnson, Laurence Fox, the right-wing press, the contrarians at Spiked, the libertarian funded 'think-tanks' like the Atlas Network & the Cato Institute, the endless 'pundits' such as Darren Grimes & David Starkey, they all promote a similar nationalist ideology:
Scholars apply the labels “quasi-fascist,” “proto-fascist,” “semi-fascist,” & “borderline fascist" - the latter label referring to leaders whose behaviour & attitudes resemble those of historical fascist leaders in some respects.
Those similarities included contempt for truth, democratic values & the rule of law, demagoguery, appeals to racism, incitements to mob violence, attacks on the legitimacy of the press & of established institutions of government, & the exploitation of scapegoats.

Sound familiar?
Democracy is the proverbial frog in a pot of boiling water, slowly becoming hotter: we're boiling RIGHT NOW because of the institutional failures & corruption & greed that got us here. Add almost unlimited technological & financial resources used to push this ideology, &, well,😱
“As we face greater and greater issues of social complexity, we have to hold on to the ability to be rational. Because if we lose that, all we have is a tide swell of emotion, which is uncontrollable, and will take us to places we really don’t want to go.” - Prof Chas Critcher.
This THREAD is based on the Professor Emeritus of History at Oberlin College, Robert Soucy's entry on #Fascism in the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

The quote at the end is from Professor Chas Critcher (Policing the Crisis; Moral Panics in the Media) & is from a different context.👍

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GET A GRIP

GET A GRIP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

Sep 13
🧵

OK, I'll bite.

The word Fascism isn't 'meaningless'.

To spell out why, we need to unpack both the underlying implication of Andrew Doyle's argument and the reasons why it fails to adequately account for contemporary political dangers. Image
Andrew Doyle asserts that the term "fascism" is misused to the point of recklessness, echoing George Orwell’s 1944 observation that the word had been rendered meaningless. Doyle’s concern is not uncommon—but imho, it’s ultimately misplaced, especially in today’s context.
While it’s true that “fascism” is sometimes deployed rhetorically or hyperbolically (eg by Trump), Doyle’s framing dangerously downplays the genuine resurgence of fascist-adjacent movements across the Western world and undermines the analytical clarity necessary to confront them. Image
Read 23 tweets
Sep 8
🧵

Boris Johnson appears to have had a secret meeting with billionaire Peter Thiel - perhaps the most fanatical of the libertarian Oligarchs and co-founder of the controversial US data firm Palantir, the year before it was given a role at the heart of the UK’s pandemic response. Image
A month after entering No 10, Johnson and his senior adviser Dominic Cummings had a meeting with Thiel, leaked files suggest.

Johnson is now likely to face questions about whether the non-disclosure amounts to a breach of the ministerial code.

theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/s…
The hour-long afternoon meeting on 28 August 2019 was marked “private” in a log of Johnson’s activities that day and was not subsequently disclosed on the government’s public log of meetings.

Read 12 tweets
Aug 31
🧵

Elon Musk has been amplifying far-right accounts again, including Tommy Robinson, Rupert Lowe, and numerous anonynmous known #disinformation superspreader accounts like 'End Wokeness'.

Let's examine the context for yesterday's march in Richard Tice's constituency, #Skegness. Image
After decades of neglect, Skegness (pop 20K), stands out on key socio-economic markers on national averages: residents are older; whiter; lower full-time employment; higher rates of few/no qualifications; and concentrated deprivation - it's far-more deprived than most of England. Image
History repeatedly teaches us that burdening already struggling communities is a recipe for disaster.

These communities have been crying out for help for DECADES, but successive UK Govts have largely ignored their pleas, and continued to increase inequality, which harms us all. Image
Read 60 tweets
Aug 28
🧵 @Rylan Asylum seekers coming here aren’t technically "illegal." International law (the 1951 Refugee Convention) allows people to seek asylum in any country regardless of how they arrive or how many countries they pass through, as long as they're fleeing persecution or danger.
Allow me to explain why asylum seekers aren’t “illegal”, and how misinformation and nasty demonising and scapegoating rhetoric by certain politicians and media, including news media, has made some British people less welcoming of asylum seeekers.

@Rylan
People fleeing war, torture, or persecution have the legal right to seek asylum.

The 1951 Refugee Convention, which the UK helped write, says anyone escaping danger can apply for asylum in another country no matter how they arrive: claiming asylum isn't a crime.

@Rylan
Read 23 tweets
Aug 27
Farage's illiberal, immoral, & unworkable authoritarian plan involves ripping up human rights laws forged after WWII, which protect British people, & wasting £billions of UK taxpayers' money, giving some of it to corrupt misogynistic totalitarian regimes.
theguardian.com/politics/2025/…Image
Image
Leaving the #ECHR, repealing the Human Rights Act and disapplying international conventions

The UK would be an outlier among European democracies, in the company of only Russia and Belarus, if it were to leave the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

Opting out of treaties such as the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, the UN Convention against torture and the Council of Europe Anti-Trafficking Convention would also be likely to do serious harm to the UK’s international reputation.

It could also undermine current return deals, including with France, and other cooperation agreements on people-smuggling with European nations such as Germany.

The Society of Labour Lawyers said the plan would “in all likelihood preclude further cooperation and law enforcement in dealing with small boats coming from the continent and so increase, rather than reduce, the numbers reaching our shores”. 

Farage said he would legislate to remove the “Hardial Singh” safeguards – a reference to a legal precedent that sets limits on the Home Office’s immigration detention powers – to allow indefinite detention for immigration purposes. This would be highly vulnerable to legal challenge.

Many of the rights protected by the ECHR and the Human Rights Act are rooted in British case law, so judges would still be able to prevent deportations, even without international conventions.

x.com/docrussjackson…
Reform UK’s grotesque far-right mass deportation plan is not just economically and socially illiterate (Britain an ageing population and low birth rate) rely on striking “returns agreements” with countries including Afghanistan, Iran, Eritrea and Sudan, offering financial incentives to secure these deals, alongside visa restrictions and potential sanctions on countries that refuse.

These are countries where the Home Office’s risk reports warn of widespread torture and persecution.

It would risk the scenario of making payments to countries such as Iran, whose regime the UK government has accused of plotting terror attacks on British soil.

The Liberal Democrats called the payments “a Taliban tax”, saying the plan would entail sending billions “to an oppressive regime that British soldiers fought and died to defeat”. They said: “Not a penny of taxpayers’ money should go to a group so closely linked to terrorist organisations proscribed by the UK.”
Read 13 tweets
Aug 25
🧵

The internet never forgets.

A thread of tweets posted by Lucy Connolly.

A reminder of the one, viewed 310,000 times, for which she was jailed, which urged people to burn down asylum seeker hotels after the #Southport attack - which had nothing to do with asylum seekers. Image
While all these tweets of Connolly's were made before her incendiary post, they don't say which year they were posted.

They can be accessed here, via The Wayback Machine, which has archived more than 916 billion web pages.

Draw your own conclusions.

web.archive.org/web/2024080616…
Connolly's tweet (top right) was in response to the tweet on the left, which criticised Laurence Fox for posting an upskirt photograph of Narinder Kaur.

The next one (right centre) was Connolly asking Kaur if she had 'flashed her gash'.

The third discusses a teenage experience. Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(