Yes, and there is no contradiction there. He was saying Trump's victory, though real -- i.e., he got the most votes in the key EC states -- was achieved due in part to interference from Russia. He wasn't questioning whether Trump actually got the most votes
https://twitter.com/neontaster/status/1335953398298980353
It's like if someone argued a candidate won because of "dark money" influence, or disinformation by trolls (whether foreign or domestic). It isn't questioning IF someone won. It's questioning the forces that caused that to happen. That's different than the Q loons and Trumpkins
So it Trumpkins said, yeah our guy lost but only bc the liberal media wouldn't give him honest coverage, blah blah blah, I would disagree but that's at least admitting a fact about the outcome. THAT is equal to what the left or Dems said after 16 re: Russia, troll farms, etc
...whereas right now the Trump folks simply refuse to believe their guy lost at all. I mean come on, Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are saying he won CA FFS, and now he says the R Senators who lost only lost bc of fraud too. This is batshit lunacy
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
