We're currently preaching through Titus at @citieschurch. It's a remarkable and timely little book. A few notes, based on preaching one section and listening to my fellow pastors preach others.
1) Titus is a book about the church & its leadership. Paul exhorts Titus to establish & strengthen churches in Crete by appointing elders. And Titus is supposed to find these elders among Cretans who are "always liars, evil beasts, & lazy gluttons." That's what the gospel does.
2) Titus 2 contains clear & relevant ethical instruction for all types of people: older men, older women, younger men, younger women. Lots of wise & profound & particular exhortations to these groups of people.
3) This ethical instruction accords with & adorns sound doctrine. How we live must be in line with what God has said (2:1). And how we live must flow from what God has done (2:11). citieschurch.com/sermons/as-wit…
4) Sound doctrine centers on salvation. As Paul simply says in 3:4: "He saved us." Over & over, Paul refers to Christ as our great God *and Savior.* Grace has appeared, *bringing salvation for all people* (2:11). The doctrine we confess is fundamentally that JESUS SAVES SINNERS.
5) Here's a cool part. When it comes to the doctrine of salvation, we can distinguish the global dimension of salvation in redemptive history (the major events we celebrate: incarnation, cross, resurrection) and the personal dimension of salvation in our lives.
Macro and Micro. The external & objective works in history vs. the personal & individual works in your life. Salvation accomplished. Salvation applied. Paul focuses on *both* in the letter to Titus. 2:11-14 dwells on the Macro. 3:3-7 dwells on the Micro.
6) Even cooler: these days everyone loves to talk about realized eschatology, the "already/not yet" structure of salvation. We're already *truly* saved. We're not yet *finally* saved. Thus there are past, present, and future dimensions to salvation.
Or again, in saving us:
1) God does something *decisive* in the past.
2) God is doing something *progressive* in the present.
3) God will do something *final* in the future.
AND: Titus is the clearest place in the Bible where this structure is applied to both Macro & Micro.
Macro: Titus 2:11-14.
Already: Grace appeared (in the past) when Christ gave himself for us.
Not Yet: Glory will appear (in the future), which is our blessed hope.
Now: In the present age, Christ is gathering his people & purifying them as his treasured possession.
Micro: Titus 3:3-8
Already: Christ saved us (in the past) when he justified us by his grace & not by works.
Not Yet: We now live as heirs according to the hope of eternal life (in the future)
Now: And so, in the present, we who have believed devote ourselves to good works.
7) From these passages, we can also fill out our doctrine of salvation by asking (at the Macro): Saved
1) From what? Lawlessness (2:14), ungodliness & worldly passions (2:12)
2) By what? He gave himself for us (2:14)
3) For what? To create a people zealous for good works (2:14)
Or again (at the Micro):
1) From what? Foolish, disobedient, slaves to passions, etc (3:3)
2) By what? Regeneration, renewal, & justification by grace, not works (3:5)
3) For what? Good works (3:1, 3:8)
8) And this is why the ethical conduct of 2:1-10 accords with & adorns the doctrine of our God & Savior. Because God has saved us in this way, we rest with confidence on Christ's past work, lean with expectation into Christ's future work, & so live godly lives in the present.
So then, if you want to explore the basics of salvation, both at the redemptive-historical level & the personal-individual level, within the framework of the already/not yet, for the sake of Christian ethics in the context of growing churches, might I recommend the book of Titus?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe Rigney

Joe Rigney Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joe_rigney

9 Nov
Watching some Christians react to election news is a sober reminder of how easy it is to forget the unborn and the horrific evil and injustice that is legally done to them every day in this country.
Take this sentiment expressed by a Christian journalist, which is simultaneously ignorant, tacky, and completely callous to the horror of the murder of innocents.
It's ignorant, because 1) correlation does not equal causation, and 2) a far more plausible reason that abortion rates declined in those years is owing to pro-life legislation at the state level. christianpost.com/voices/no-demo…
Read 15 tweets
15 May
Great post here from @scottrswain on important theological categories for thinking about sex identity (who and what we are as male and female). scottrswain.com/2020/05/14/mor…

Three additional thoughts: 1/
1) An additional fact that Swain doesn’t directly highlight is that the “common” Adam starts off in the body of a single man. In other words, the common Adam is not de-sexed or de-gendered, but is in fact male. 2/
This establishes the temporal progression and polarity of Adam as original (and therefore, head) and Eve as eschatological (and therefore, glory). 3/
Read 17 tweets
11 Dec 19
Further reflections on the difference between broad & narrow complementarians (see this thread: )
The question before the house is this: Is the difference btw narrows & broads merely a matter of *application* of shared biblical principles, or is it a matter of a different understanding of biblical principles themselves?
To make the question concrete, let's consider one of the key passages: 1 Timothy 2:11-15. There Paul grounds the prohibition on women teaching and exercising authority in the order of creation (Adam first) and the nature of the first sin (Eve deceived).
Read 14 tweets
11 Dec 19
I'm eager to dig in to the new @9Marks journal on the reckoning among complementarians. 9marks.org/wp-content/upl…
I've already read or skimmed a few articles and it looks helpful and clarifying in many respects.
For example, I agree with @samueld_james that the inter-comp debate is often a matter of different instincts:
That said, the opening editorial by @JonathanLeeman contains this line:
"Turning to the inside of the church and home, broad and narrow complementarians agree on the basic biblical principles, but they tend to *apply* those shared principles differently."
Read 13 tweets
18 Nov 19
So Gavin Ortlund's recommendation of Gregory the Great () reminded me of a little thing that I wrote (but never published) a few years ago. It was inspired by Bede's story of Gregory's role in sending the mission to the English. sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/bede-gr…
Pope Gregory I had many accomplishments to his name. His book on pastoral care was a standard text in the Middle Ages. Calvin famously called him the last good pope. His liturgical reforms earned him the title “Father of Christian Worship.” 2/
His dialogues led the Eastern Church to call him “Gregory the Dialogist.” And, of course, he is most commonly called Gregory the Great. 3/
Read 21 tweets
18 Jun 19
Kim makes a reasonable point here, so I'll try to give a reasonable response: 1/
1) The definition of empathy is contested and often confused. One friend who has studied the topic told me that the academic literature is filled with debates and discussions about empathy, sympathy, and compassion and the distinctions between them. 2/
2) This article lists 8 different contested definitions. theatlantic.com/health/archive… This is unsurprising because the word has only been in use for about 100 years. 3/
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!