Here's a thread about how completely impossible it is to have a rational conversation about Brexit.

In the 2016 referendum, I campaigned for Remain. Here's a speech I gave 3 and a half weeks before the referendum. A clip of it appeared in TV drama 'Brexit: The Uncivil War'.
I'm now told that actually I'm not a Remainer, despite campaigning for Remain in the referendum campaign in rallies in, say, Wolverhampton, London and Greater Manchester, arguing for Remain on Question Time, and writing multiple columns supporting Remain.
Here's a viral video I made before the referendum result, warning about the consequences of Tory Brexit.

It was pretty prophetic if you watch it.
Was I - am I - a critic of the EU? Had I suggested the left should debate the case for leaving the EU? Yes! 100%.

At the time, the Remain campaign told me that made me valuable because I could speak to other eurosceptics. This video went viral on Facebook in the referendum.
If I'm not a Remainer, despite not just voting for Remain, but actively campaigning for it, then fine, but using 'the 48%' is a bit meaningless because if I don't make the cut, where does that leave millions of Remainers who also voted for Remain despite being critical of the EU?
When Leave won, my view was that we had to make a result I had actively campaigned against work. Here's how I summed it up in the hours after the referendum result.
This was a position I stuck to for the next 3 years. Make the referendum result work, search for a compromise, push for a soft Brexit, talk about issues I care about - housing, jobs, living standards, public ownership, tax justice, the climate emergency.
After the European elections, my view was that compromise was dead - nobody wanted it anymore - Remain voters had defected to the Lib Dems and Greens, the Labour membership would impose a new referendum at conference anyway, and therefore Labour had to back a new referendum.
As it happens my view was totally irrelevant and Jeremy Corbyn had decided to support a new referendum in all circumstances in the last week of the European elections because he was alarmed at the defection of Labour voters to the Lib Dems and membership support for a referendum.
Today I wrote a column arguing the reason we now have the hardest possible Brexit is because of the lies of rightwing Brexiteers, the refusal of Theresa May to compromise, the failures of Corbyn's leadership - and ultra Remainers who opposed and toxified any compromise.
The fallout of this column is a deluge of often pretty unhinged abuse - which I'm more than used to! - and a number of accounts comparing my argument to blaming women for being raped.

This is not reasonable behaviour.
And for example, this is the sort of language I normally receive from the far right. "Traitors". "Quislings". "Treasons". But this person, like me, voted for Remain.

I totally get people disagreeing with me. That's fine! Again, I'm more than used to this! But what disturbs me more is that Brexit has left certain factions - who are noisy, angry, but ultimately unrepresentative - completely unable to have a rational conversation.
Am I left-wing eurosceptic who campaigned for Remain as the best of the two options on the ballot paper in 2016? Yes. Did I think we should try and make the referendum result afterwards? Yes. Did I think Labour had run out of options in the middle of 2019? Also yes.
Do I also wish unity could have been built around a soft Brexit, and do I blame the Tory Brexiteers, Jeremy Corbyn's leadership and the ultra Remainers for the failure to do so?

Yes!

Does that annoy everyone? Yes!

But it's also what I happen to believe is true.
So to conclude, it is impossible to have a rational discussion about Brexit. Hardcore Leavers and Remainers acted like they spoke for everyone. But millions were pragmatic, demonised or airbrushed out of existence, and now we are where we are - and it is grim.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Owen Jones 🌹

Owen Jones 🌹 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @OwenJones84

15 Nov
Diane Abbott was wrong to share an online platform with apologists for China's atrocities against Muslim Uighurs. But this saga again underlines the grotesque double standards applied to a) the left and b) a Black woman.
Tony Blair is a former Prime Minister - obviously far more influential than Diane Abbott - and is guilty of two things:

1) Direct apologism for Chinese atrocities in Xinjiang province

2) A relationship with China's regime
In 2014, in an interview with a mouthpiece of China's regime, Blair made common cause between the West and China's "counter-terrorism" drive in Xinjiang, and denounced "double standards" applied to China which "is facing the same problem as we are facing." globaltimes.cn/content/866551…
Read 12 tweets
15 Aug
Private education is just one way the privileged are given their advantages. It starts from birth. Affluent parents have babies with higher birth weights. They have less cramped houses, meaning better well-being and more quiet places to study.
Better-off parents tend to have more formal education and more "cultural capital". A big gap in vocabulary between richer and poorer children opens up when they're very young. Their parents can afford private tutoring. Diets are better and their children never go hungry
Poverty can impose specific stresses on family life that the affluent tend not to have. Poorer children are more likely to suffer from mental distress and poorer physical health, all of which impact educational attainment.
Read 6 tweets
1 Aug
92% of trans people consider suicide

1 in 8 have been physically attacked at work

41% suffer a hate crime over a year

Transphobic hate crimes have trebled in 5 years

Yet transphobes in powerful positions pretend they're courageous victims as they bait a marginalised minority.
There's nothing new about opponents of minorities pretending they're the real victims, hounded just for "speaking the truth"

It's still nauseating to watch transphobes in a country in which most of the media is on their side pretend they're the ones being silenced and persecuted
Courage is standing up for minorities against those who bait, ridicule and persecute them.

Courage is never adding your own personal contribution to a mountain of bigotry piled on the shoulders of trans people.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jul
On my birthday last year, a far right extremist led an attack on me, driven by homophobia and hatred of my left-wing politics. Today, he has been handed a hefty prison sentence. theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/j…
As I wrote in my victim impact statement, prison is not a solution to far right extremism. He will go to a prison a violent far right extremist, and probably leave prison a violent far right extremist.

There is no judicial solution to the far right: it is a political problem.
The attack wasn't just driven by far right extremism, but was a homophobic hate crime.

Homophobic hate crimes have doubled over five years; transphobic hate crimes have trebled. We are desperately overdue a proper discussion about this.

theguardian.com/world/2019/jun…
Read 27 tweets
11 Jul
"Cancel culture" is being used to describe everything from people disapproving of pedophiles to celebrities being criticised on social media.

It's become a means to protect the powerful and wealthy from being scrutinised for things they say or do.
A lot of what's called "the culture war" is just younger people trying to assert their different social and moral values over older generations who run most of the media.

A lot of older media types genuinely fear younger people as woke barbarians banging at their gates.
The essential truth of modern political debate is that younger people and older people now live on different planets. That's unprecedented: both Thatcher and Reagan won the youth vote.

My politics are based on class: this divide doesn't make me comfortable. But it's just a fact. Image
Read 5 tweets
10 Jul
This is a straightforward lie from Andrew Neil.

Have I robustly criticised him? Yes: for hiring the Holocaust denier David Irving, and for chairing a magazine which publishes racism and praises Nazis.

I have never, ever called for him to be sacked. ImageImageImageImage
I'm sure @afneil didn't like being criticised for hiring a Holocaust denier, or for chairing a magazine which churns out racism and apologia for Nazis.

But in a democratic society, I have a right to challenge him on that. Yet he defends himself by hiding behind "cancel culture".
This all kicked off after I wrote a column about Andrew Neil in 2018, the point of which was not to "cancel" him, but rather to underline the point that the claim the BBC has a left wing bias is ludicrous. (Which remains the case today). theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!