Value investing seems to suddenly be back in vogue, and the old saying "good things happen to cheap stocks" starting to work again. When you trade at half of one times earnings (albeit with lots of risks, leverage etc etc..), sometimes your stock can go up 4x in a few days.
Extrapolation and momentum work until they don't. Value traps are value traps until they aren't. The outlook is bleak and dire until suddenly it isn't. Stocks lack a catalyst until one arrives.
I've talked about this many times in past - if you bought this stock you've looked wrong and underperformed virtually every day until 3-4 trading days ago. Greenblatt has talked about how best performing managers over a decade spend 3yrs in worst performance DECILE. This is why.
People also say, why own more than 10-15 stocks? Why not only your best ideas? Mongolian Mining was about my 120th best idea (I have 185 stocks in portfolio). I had 30-40bp. It just made more than 1% for the fund in 4 days. Predicting which ideas work best and when is very hard.
Stocks like MM are impossible to concentrate into, because there is a lot of uncertainty and a decent chance of a zero. If you concentrate and focus only on your 'best ideas' you will never own stocks like MM. But they can have great risk/rewards if you diversify & are patient.
The best way to think about these sorts of stocks is like you're buying a long dated call option on a few things unexpectedly going right, that only expires if the company goes bankrupt/dilutes you to irrelevance. 30bp is an appropriate position size for such option positions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lyall Taylor

Lyall Taylor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LT3000Lyall

8 Dec
Uber is abandoning its self-driving car efforts to try to cut costs and become profitable. As Kalanick himself observed, self-driving cars are an existential threat to Uber. When tech is ready & commercialized, there is a good chance UBER's ride hailing biz is disrupted to zero.
Whoever gets there first will use/license the tech, launch an Uber-like app with autonomous cars at a fraction of current prices, and Uber's expensive, labour intensive model won't be able to compete.
At best, Uber will have to pay whatever it takes to license the tech, but Uber will be in a weak bargaining position and up against many other potential cashed-up tech bidders (or tech owner launching their own app/network). At best huge amount of value is paid away in licensing.
Read 4 tweets
8 Dec
When you're doing a sum-of-the-parts valuation, you should always use a value for each of the parts that is a price you would be happy to own that asset at, not its market value. Otherwise, a SOTP discount story is simply a case for a better way of making a bad investment.
Suppose a company owned $1 a share of long term treasuries at a 0.9% yield. It trades at a 20-30% discount. Would you directly buy long dated treasuries yielding 0.9% at 20-30% off? If not, then why are you buying the stock, because that's exactly what you're actually doing.
The only exception is if there is an explicit and credible intention to liquidate the said assets and return capital to shareholders. Otherwise, in a discount you're just finding a better way to make a bad investment.
Read 5 tweets
7 Dec
Why economy/consumer spend/bad debt has been better than expected:

1) Consumers stopped spending on travel & entertainment so had more money in pockets.
2) Ordinarily one person's spending is another's income, so this would decimate economy, but fiscal stimulus has plugged gap.
Has had some perverse outcomes. Some industries have seen record consumer spend (e.g. home improvement), due to reallocation of T&E spend coupled with fiscally preserved aggregate income. Also increase retail stock market participation/speculation as savings rates rose.
Investors also expected a huge wave of bad debt in banking system, but because savings rates actually rose (lack of ability to spend money + govt propping up incomes), consumer loan defaults have in many cases actually fallen as they've had more net savings to pay down debt.
Read 4 tweets
5 Dec
Compounder bros overlook that the most effective long term compounding often comes from high distributed FCF yields (dividends and buybacks) that are then reinvested at high distributable FCF yields. Has little do to with growth per se - esp if paid up for in advance.
The other thing effective long term compounding requires is the avoidance of periodic, catastrophic losses. When growth stocks go wrong they go down 90%. If that happens once every 20 years it destroys your ability to compound. Avoidance of the risk of large losses is imperative.
In good times, people often criticise Buffett for missing winners. But Buffett knows that great long term results require one place primacy on avoiding losses, not missing winners. A large part of Buffett's track record is due to him having avoided any major losses for 70yrs.
Read 4 tweets
3 Dec
Australian iron ore producer Fortescue (FMG AU) is a great example of how value investing often works in practice. In 2018 the stock was trading for A$4. It was cheap at spot iron ore - a mid single digit FCF multiple, even w historically high discounts on low-grade 58pc Fe (1/n)
The reason it was cheap was investors believed the increased 58pc discount was structural not cyclical, and benchmark iron ore prices of US$60-70/MT were not sustainable - Chinese demand would surely falter, and send prices down to US$40-50/MT (2/n).
I basically agreed with the market. That was also my expectation. But I decided to buy some anyway because I recognized I could be wrong, and if either iron ore prices stayed at US$60/MT or rose; OR 58pc discounts narrowed to historical levels, the stock would prove very cheap.
Read 14 tweets
2 Dec
Most investors assess the accuracy of their analysis by the share price. But all a rising share price proves is that there have been more buyers than sellers. You only find out if your analysis was right after 10yrs+ when u can tally up dividends paid & compare to purchase price.
I saw a manager recently talk about how an illiquid small cap stock they own is up 10-20%, as if that proved the wisdom of their decision. But one of the reasons it's up is that I've been buying it and have contributed to pushing up the price. But what if I'm wrong?
What is true on a small scale is also true on a large scale with big companies. More buyers than sellers push up share prices, and vice versa. That's driven entirely by opinion, sentiment, and liquidity (Fed, inflows, etc). It says nothing at all about whether analysis is right.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!