1/
#Substack - good for dissenting writing or not really?

i've been reading their ToS & guidelines, thread follows
2/
the hot piece first: Content Guidelines

nebulous "Hate" is banned. even including *calls for exclusion* based on protected characteristics 🤐.

no more Boy Scouts or Lady's Day at the gym 🤡
3/
Content Guidelines, cont.:

>anything that violates laws or regulations

obey Pakistani blasphemy laws? nah, luckily the Publisher Agreement ascertains that's the California, USA, jurisdiction. not bad, but...

>causing harm

in CA that means "criticism of feminists". welp :-(
4/
Copyright Dispute Policy takes typical DMCA-centric view.

reserves right to ban you for *repeated* offenses 👌; provides for *accused* content deletion or lock 🥴
5/
Copyright Dispute Policy allows for typical DMCA counter-notice.

bad news: you'll have to doxx yourself to Substack(!), and they in turn will forward your doxx to the original filler (!!) (the accuser) without verifying who that is.

RIPE FOR ABUSE 💢
6/
Repeat Infringer - banhammer for three *notices* on different pieces of content in a year 🥴

not even cases of infringement, mere *notices*.

RIPE FOR ABUSE 💢
7/
Terms of Service seem to prohibit automated tools like Google, DDG, WaybackMachine etc., from scrapping the website for search or archival 🤡

hello? do you even internet brah? 🥴 @SubstackInc
8/
Publisher Agreement (the main contract)

proscribes taking payments in parallel through Patreon etc., *and* Substack at the same time.

i can see a lot of *sense* in that, just be aware of it.
9/
Publisher Agreement, contd.:

if you take payments, you agree to self-doxx to Substack upon request 👎.

probably KYC/AML. annoying stuff. i'm very close to saying, "just don't conduct business with US/EU institutions, or you deserve whatever you get from them".
10/
Publisher Agreement, contd.:

reserves the right to terminate your account for any reason or no reason at all. probably the worst part of it, but since it's bog-standard on the internet, i'm just giving it a clown-world reaction 🤡🌍
11/
Publisher Agreement, contd.:

mandatory binding arbitration in California. idk, didn't Patreon get screwed over with that recently? not my problem anyway.
12/
summary:

Substack has major vulnerability to "legal" attack through DMCA abuse: both privacy violation (doxx) and content takedown/automatic ban 👎👎.

Substack also wants your private data (doxx) if you use paid subscription 👎👎.
13/
my view:

i was interested in @SubstackInc for blogging, but having checked out the ToS & related documents, i'm quite wary of privacy implications and the ease with which a "legal" take-down of all my posting can be mounted. 🥴

will consult friends and think it through.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with mark doppelgänger 🛰

mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoppelMark

10 Dec
1/
context: the left is attacking pornhub

question is raised, "should we ally with the left to dismantle pornhub?"

that's not possible this time around.
2/
the left is not aiming to *shut down* the pornhub; quite the opposite: they want to *take it over from inside*.

through pressure applied by the media on service providers and employees.

always the same scenario:
3/
the left doesn't want to *shut down* vices; the left wants to *control & tax* the vices - because they use vices as pay-offs.
Read 8 tweets
10 Dec
1/
in which Roko re-discovers, for better or worse, the class system
2/
medieval society had classes going from 1 through 2 to 3.

now-a-day we have X/10 grading; is that much different?

3/
note that in the traditional class system, the cross-class promotion was equally possible for both sexes (through heroic deeds or through heroic beauty).

also apologies for the somewhat glib, acerbic commentary - i'm somewhat new to this particular idea.
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec
1/
>keeping manufacturing capability up and running is bad

it's good. expensive, sure, but good none the less. especially several *competing* programs and organizations in parallel.
2/
>rockets and tech wins wars

???

we've been there before, several times in fact. every single time humans turned out to be better at it. every time guns were removed from a fighter aircraft, they had to be re-introduced *ex post haste*.

3/
"but mark", i hear you object, "how could an imperfect human perform better than a perfect machine?"

humans are much better at making spot decisions
and at OODA, precision observation, etc.

than at predicting all possible scenarios and programming machines.
Read 10 tweets
9 Dec
1/
Alex delivers interesting news 👌

let's grab a few choice screencaps
2/
>yay book burning

wtf journalist. wtf?
3/
>reactive censorship is not enough

wtf journalist. wtf??
Read 8 tweets
8 Dec
1/
reminder, there are plenty of short leftist memes floating around

we don't consider them *memes* because the reward is very alien to us (moral permission to do evil for "greater good")

2/
Daniel implies that strong reactions are propagandized, while natural reactions are weak and need deep deprogramming to surface.

3/
what is leftism?

*destroying social structure*, says Daniel

Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!