reserves right to ban you for *repeated* offenses 👌; provides for *accused* content deletion or lock 🥴
5/ Copyright Dispute Policy allows for typical DMCA counter-notice.
bad news: you'll have to doxx yourself to Substack(!), and they in turn will forward your doxx to the original filler (!!) (the accuser) without verifying who that is.
RIPE FOR ABUSE 💢
6/ Repeat Infringer - banhammer for three *notices* on different pieces of content in a year 🥴
not even cases of infringement, mere *notices*.
RIPE FOR ABUSE 💢
7/ Terms of Service seem to prohibit automated tools like Google, DDG, WaybackMachine etc., from scrapping the website for search or archival 🤡
proscribes taking payments in parallel through Patreon etc., *and* Substack at the same time.
i can see a lot of *sense* in that, just be aware of it.
9/ Publisher Agreement, contd.:
if you take payments, you agree to self-doxx to Substack upon request 👎.
probably KYC/AML. annoying stuff. i'm very close to saying, "just don't conduct business with US/EU institutions, or you deserve whatever you get from them".
10/ Publisher Agreement, contd.:
reserves the right to terminate your account for any reason or no reason at all. probably the worst part of it, but since it's bog-standard on the internet, i'm just giving it a clown-world reaction 🤡🌍
11/ Publisher Agreement, contd.:
mandatory binding arbitration in California. idk, didn't Patreon get screwed over with that recently? not my problem anyway.
12/ summary:
Substack has major vulnerability to "legal" attack through DMCA abuse: both privacy violation (doxx) and content takedown/automatic ban 👎👎.
Substack also wants your private data (doxx) if you use paid subscription 👎👎.
13/ my view:
i was interested in @SubstackInc for blogging, but having checked out the ToS & related documents, i'm quite wary of privacy implications and the ease with which a "legal" take-down of all my posting can be mounted. 🥴
will consult friends and think it through.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
3/ note that in the traditional class system, the cross-class promotion was equally possible for both sexes (through heroic deeds or through heroic beauty).
also apologies for the somewhat glib, acerbic commentary - i'm somewhat new to this particular idea.
we've been there before, several times in fact. every single time humans turned out to be better at it. every time guns were removed from a fighter aircraft, they had to be re-introduced *ex post haste*.