1/
>keeping manufacturing capability up and running is bad

it's good. expensive, sure, but good none the less. especially several *competing* programs and organizations in parallel.
2/
>rockets and tech wins wars

???

we've been there before, several times in fact. every single time humans turned out to be better at it. every time guns were removed from a fighter aircraft, they had to be re-introduced *ex post haste*.

3/
"but mark", i hear you object, "how could an imperfect human perform better than a perfect machine?"

humans are much better at making spot decisions
and at OODA, precision observation, etc.

than at predicting all possible scenarios and programming machines.
4/
we *suck* at programming so much that we get near-monthly updates for the machine you are using right now - and even the update process itself *sucks* appreciably.

we used to know that. don't let the knowledge get lost, like knowledge of sources of vit C preventing scurvy was Image
5/
how come humans are better at it than computers?

we are great at passing on knowledge in *informal ways*, and we are mediocre-to-terrible at codifying it.

recall how much better *a culture* handles rules than *a body of codified law*.
6/
battleship weapons = dumb projectiles delivered according to computer calculations.

aircraft carrier weapons = airplanes with *human officers* that then execute attacks.

ofc. the later reigns superb on the battlefield.

7/
a little known fact - the back-and-forth battle between armor & projectiles was a closely ran affair.

the torpedo, and the air-delivered weaponry changed the balance permanently by changing *the paradigm* - to multi-mode, close range.

8/
my position on man vs machine:

a) men are better at fighting than at programming

b) a drone is equivalent to a missile, not of an aircraft. you still want human officers in the hot seat of launch/control. whether you're talking the rus. Granit or the Airpower Teaming System ImageImage
9/
lastly we're nearing era of return-to-dominance of small, lightweight projectile/beam weapons: the railguns, and the lasers.

that is certain to shuffle a few things around :-)
i saw your 'like' here, @0x49fa98 :]

what's your opinion - at what point will humans get better at programming than at fighting?

or, perhaps, the computers will get better than us at programming...?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with mark doppelgänger 🛰

mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoppelMark

10 Dec
1/
context: the left is attacking pornhub

question is raised, "should we ally with the left to dismantle pornhub?"

that's not possible this time around.
2/
the left is not aiming to *shut down* the pornhub; quite the opposite: they want to *take it over from inside*.

through pressure applied by the media on service providers and employees.

always the same scenario:
3/
the left doesn't want to *shut down* vices; the left wants to *control & tax* the vices - because they use vices as pay-offs.
Read 8 tweets
10 Dec
1/
in which Roko re-discovers, for better or worse, the class system
2/
medieval society had classes going from 1 through 2 to 3.

now-a-day we have X/10 grading; is that much different?

3/
note that in the traditional class system, the cross-class promotion was equally possible for both sexes (through heroic deeds or through heroic beauty).

also apologies for the somewhat glib, acerbic commentary - i'm somewhat new to this particular idea.
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec
1/
#Substack - good for dissenting writing or not really?

i've been reading their ToS & guidelines, thread follows
2/
the hot piece first: Content Guidelines

nebulous "Hate" is banned. even including *calls for exclusion* based on protected characteristics 🤐.

no more Boy Scouts or Lady's Day at the gym 🤡
3/
Content Guidelines, cont.:

>anything that violates laws or regulations

obey Pakistani blasphemy laws? nah, luckily the Publisher Agreement ascertains that's the California, USA, jurisdiction. not bad, but...

>causing harm

in CA that means "criticism of feminists". welp :-(
Read 13 tweets
9 Dec
1/
Alex delivers interesting news 👌

let's grab a few choice screencaps
2/
>yay book burning

wtf journalist. wtf?
3/
>reactive censorship is not enough

wtf journalist. wtf??
Read 8 tweets
8 Dec
1/
reminder, there are plenty of short leftist memes floating around

we don't consider them *memes* because the reward is very alien to us (moral permission to do evil for "greater good")

2/
Daniel implies that strong reactions are propagandized, while natural reactions are weak and need deep deprogramming to surface.

3/
what is leftism?

*destroying social structure*, says Daniel

Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!