This is extraordinary
Changing the word "gender" to "sex" makes it absolutely clear that when a woman does not consent to a person of the opposite sex putting their fingers inside her, that means no.
If @rapecrisisscot think this doesn't matter they are not fit for purpose.
Changing the word "gender" to "sex" makes it absolutely clear that when a woman does not consent to a person of the opposite sex putting their fingers inside her, that means no.
If @rapecrisisscot think this doesn't matter they are not fit for purpose.
https://twitter.com/rapecrisisscot/status/1336304717866168327
When the GRA -conflating sex & gender- was going thru parliament no one thought that it would be used for this. They did not think it thru.
People who argue for this on the basis of "be kind" did not think this thru.
At some point you have to say no.
a-question-of-consent.net/2020/09/16/doc…
People who argue for this on the basis of "be kind" did not think this thru.
At some point you have to say no.
a-question-of-consent.net/2020/09/16/doc…
I thought that that point might be when @stonewalluk was telling schools they should allow boys to identify into girls showers.
I thought it might be when @rcgp was giving out a prize celebrating male doctor for intimately examining women without consent.
I thought it might be when @rcgp was giving out a prize celebrating male doctor for intimately examining women without consent.
Is it at the point where @rapecrisisscot is saying that women *who have been raped* & who *are being intimately examined* do not deserve a clear answer to the Q "can I be seen by a female doctor" ?
😢😢
At what point do people stop looking away and defending the indefensible?
😢😢
At what point do people stop looking away and defending the indefensible?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
