Right now, planning out the camera angles and edits for a very talky exposition scene is really helping me pinpoint exactly where the drama is lacking in the script.
In the current version of my script, a rich dude is hosting a dinner party and giving the interesting back story of a very valuable artifact that he owns -- an artifact that functions as the McGuffin of the entire script.
It's an interesting history. And I think the character has a pretty interesting voice. So it reads pretty well on the page. But it wasn't until I got into the nitty gritty of shot listing how I'd want to shoot the scene that I realized that the scene isn't dramatic.
But now I realize that the scene will probably drag on the screen simply because: there's not much more to the scene than the words themselves. The words don't present a dramatic situation, but rather necessary backstory. And being necessary doesn't excuse being boring.
A couple of recent rewatches for me this week: NASHVILLE and SHAMPOO, both from 1975. Both have killer scenes where all of the drama is in glances and reaction shots: From NASHVILLE, Keith Carradine performing "I'm Easy" w/ four different women thinking it could be about them.
And from SHAMPOO, where Warren Beatty, Julie Christie, Goldie Hawn, Jack Warden, & Lee Grant are all at the same election night party, trying to suss out the romantic entanglements of the various couples.
Anyway, I'm working on revising this scene with these two precedents in mind: staging the dinner party as a kind of jockeying-for-romantic-pole-position between the various participants. That's the drama of the scene. The info simply rides on top of it, & perhaps glosses it.
So far, I don't have to change any dialogue. I'm simply staging the drama through actions & reactions & looks, which I think will work: none of the characters will openly acknowledge the drama going on, but all are participating in it while pretending to talk about the artifact.
So, the necessary info still gets across, but the scene isn't actually about that info, but the dynamics between the characters. Anyway, we'll see. But it took actually detailing how boring the shots were going to be to realize the prior undramatic state of affairs.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tony Tost

Tony Tost Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tonytost

9 Dec
One of the best pieces of screenwriting advice I got was after I wrote the pilot for DAMNATION. James Mangold had come aboard as an EP. I had two scripts. We were close to getting ready to pitch the show around town. He thought one of the characters wasn't strong enough yet.
It was the character of Amelia Davenport, the preacher's wife. Or, the "preacher's" "wife." He asked me to name my dream actresses for the part. I named them. He then asked: can you point to one scene in these two scripts that would make any of those actresses jump at the role?
I was annoyed. But he was right. I went through all of my Amelia scenes in the first two episodes. I had all these layers in mind for her, and a pretty interesting back story. But I hadn't written a scene for an actress to play that dramatized her (to me) interesting psychology.
Read 11 tweets
3 Dec
I did an earlier very long thread telling the roundabout story about how I broke in as a TV writer at 35 while living in Seattle. I'll try to tell the next chapter: starting off my career writing and developing for TV and trying to stay somewhat afloat in my first year.
My initial thread had a bit of an underdog narrative: going from growing up in a trailer park to becoming a writer in Hollywood. This very long thread doesn't really have that. It's more about the crusty details about the difficulty of finding my footing once I got my big break.
This isn't meant as advice or as exemplary. More like some data points if you're trying to figure your own path. Back in the day, my wife and I found John August's blog to be invaluable in terms of figuring out this new landscape. Maybe these threads can pay that back a little...
Read 111 tweets
3 Dec
NASHVILLE (1975). I tried watching it in my twenties and kept falling asleep. I watched it in my thirties and shrugged. I just watched it again in my forties and absolutely loved it.
Country music, soul-of-America thematics, a cast full of character actors, cockeyed 1970s filmmaking. I mean, all it's missing is like Clint Eastwood and maybe some samurai and it'd have all my favorite cinematic ingredients.
Watching the Criterion blu ray projected on my bedroom wall helped a lot. Previous viewings on VHS & DVD made me think it was kind of a visually drab film. Obviously not the case. It's not one-perfect-shot flashy, but it's full of richly textured frames with tons of variety.
Read 8 tweets
24 Nov
Sometimes I get questions about how to break in as a screenwriter. I don't have much in the way of answers or advice. I broke in when I was 35 while living in Seattle. I can try to cover how I did so, in case that's of any use (or amusement).
Short version: ten years ago, a writer pal of mine got hired as a TV staff writer. I wrote a couple of scripts and he shared them with his agents, who responded positively. They became my agents and set up a week and a half of meetings for me, which went very well.
Long version: after PULP FICTION came out when I was a teen, I wanted to become the next Tarantino/Scorsese/Spike Lee. But I lived in a trailer park in a small town in WA. I didn't know any writers or artists, let alone screenwriters or filmmakers. I didn't know the first step.
Read 86 tweets
29 Oct
I think a lot about Chuck Jones' famous rules for his Road Runner cartoons. I'm trying to do something similar for what I'm hoping to be my next TV show.
My version is more "core principles" than specific storytelling rules, though I'd like to eventually spell out the latter as well. Maybe it's my poetry background, or my start in writing procedural mysteries, but I need an inner formal logic whenever I write a script.
I think that's why I like working in genre -- and usually seek out films that are in a genre vein. I like having a constellation of expectations for a story to work through, or break away from. Something for the writing to spin against, to paraphrase my teacher Miller Williams.
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
I think post-production is the most underrated pivotal element of a TV writer's life. It's probably also the thing I miss the most when I'm between seasons/shows. It was largely a mystery to me even during my five seasons on LONGMIRE, as the writing staff wasn't involved w/ post.
So when I sold DAMNATION and its pilot got the green light to be filmed, it was actually my first time in post-production. The stakes felt crazy high. So did the stress levels. TV schedules are brutally short. I had to catch on really, really quickly.
About my only experiences up to this point were: overhearing my Longmire showrunner on the phone and in meetings discussing post issues (I took mental notes), sitting in with other crew members as Jimmy Muro screened his cut of a LONGMIRE episode and solicited our notes, and...
Read 56 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!