One of my favorite scientific themes is the identification of within-host immune kinetics from population data.
The divergence of the curves following pfizer #COVID19 vaccine at around day 10 demonstrates perfectly the time required for antibody secreting cells to proliferate
On Wednesday I spoke first to the @Heritage Foundation and immediately after to the @NewDemCoalition
1/
Here is a link for the first talk, with the @Heritage Foundation - I believe there is a video recording of the event there, with @paulmromer and Doug Badger, moderated by Marie Fishpaw
Have a #COVID19 test results that took more than a few days after the swab was taken??
Throw it out and refuse to pay!
A lab result delayed more than a couple days isn’t just not useful, it’s misleading and dangerous!
A test with a 4+ day turnaround should have EUA revoked.
The only way it’s useful is if it’s positive. Remember, start the isolation clock from the time of the swab. Not the result.
Also, I’m not blaming the labs here. Im highlighting a massive systemic problem.
Though I will say that all clinical labs have a responsibility to accept only specimens that they can process within a clinically relevant time. A 7-day turnaround does more harm than good.
Getting tested during a pandemic is mostly to keep others around us safe. If +ve, the test wont change that
• Tests for #COVID19 should NOT require MD order
• No person should have to pay for a test intended to help them not infect others
This is Public Health, not medicine
Testing is also performed for medicine, of course.
And if you end up in the doctors office b/c you're sick-all bets are off w regard to pay (I'm not wading into chargemaster wars!)
But if getting a test simply b/c you don't want to infect others... you should NOT have to pay.
Also- lets be honest - the questionnaire to get a test to get an automatic doctors prescription from some doctor you don't know and will never talk to... it's complete BS.
It hikes up prices, plays into a medical versus a concerted public health response and offers little else
I think going back and seeing what we got right and what we got wrong, in hindsight, will be an important exercise to help us understand, with some objectivity, what tools/models will be most useful in future pandemics and what are total rubbish.
First I think it’s great that they are using rapid tests for asymptomatic screening! This absolutely needs to happen - particularly as evidence builds that transmission peaks before symptom onset.
So that is great!
2/
Also, for those in the US - know that UK is purchasing their rapid tests from a California based company!! Shipping 1 million tests to the UK for mass rapid test screening.
Wouldn’t it be nice if Americans could also reap the benefits of this American innovation... :/
3/