Today @theCCCuk publishes it's sixth carbon budget. Opening the launch event @lorddeben makes the case that working against climate change will build the economy.
But getting to net zero will be hard. UK emissions have fallen since 1990, but still have a way to go
Lord Deben: "The longer we wait the harder and more costly it will be to combat climate change"
Chris Stark (@ChiefExecCCC): Today's report describes the journey to the long-term goal of net zero. The CCC has outlined multiple scenarios that get the UK to this goal by 2050: widespread engagement, widespread innovation, headwinds and tailwinds
Widespread engagement - people and businesses willing to make behavioural change
Widespread innovation - new technologies accelerate decarbonisation
Headwinds - progress is heavier going and more infrastructure investment is needed
Tailwinds - optimistic scenario
The CCC is working off its fifth scenario, the balanced pathway, which has a mix of technological innovation, behavioural change, headwinds and tailwinds
Front-loading emissions reductions: 60% in the next 15 years, 40% in the latter 15 years. This is aimed to reduce costs by going early, front-loading investment, helping to create jobs. This also minimises the UK’s cumulative emissions and contributions to climate change.
This pathway aligns well with the Paris requirements for carbon targets.
The biggest reductions in emissions come from promoting take-up of low carbon solutions. Electrify everything is the most cost effective way to drive emissions reductions.
But this is not just an emissions storage, we also need to work with the land to offset emissions that we cannot fully reduce or eliminate.
This means trees, lots and lots of trees
Chris Stark notes how low-carbon technologies will be the biggest driver of emissions reductions. Not surprising since some of the biggest sources of emissions are transport and heating/cooling homes. Behaviour change won't do as much here as technology
Investment of around £50bn per year is needed to get us to net zero. But this also comes with a huge cost saving from not spending on fuels. Over time this cost saving will exceed the investment.
Mike Thompson: "We designed this as a climate policy, but it could just as easily be an economic policy."
"Housing retrofit alone will add 200,000 jobs nationwide"
"This is a chance to put resources to good use. Once you factor in fuel cost savings this could boost GDP"
Lots of other benefits: cleaner air, cleaner living spaces, better health, more green spaces, more biodiversity
@theCCCuk has slashed its cost estimates, down from 1-2% of GDP, now estimating that the cost will be closer to 0.5% of GDP cost at the max of this. The rapidly falling cost of offshore wind has been a major driver here.
2020 is going to be a strange year. We are going to see reductions in emissions, but the CCC does not assume that these reductions will last though. The challenge is not to rely on a pandemic to drive emissions down, real work is needed and this needs action from government.
Changes we will see on the balanced pathway (2025):
- 30,000Ha of new trees per year
- Coal has been phased out of the power system completely
- New homes completed to the future homes standard
- 1/3 of boilers replaced and new boilers 'hydrogen ready'
- EVs 1/2 of new cars
2035:
- Emissions down 78% since 1990
- Electricity system has grown by a half
- No more gas for electricity and gas boilers entirely phased out
- Zero Carbon steel
- Reduced meat consumption by ¼
- Widespread CCUS
- 50,000Ha of forest per year
- 50% of peatland restored
Scaling up is the theme all along the pathway: offshore wind, heat pump installation, low carbon industrial clusters, EVs, hydrogen boilers. Creates an even transition
World has already warmed by ~1C, and every fraction of a degree of further warming is damaging. Reduction in the price of renewables means that emissions will be likely flat in the future, reducing the likelihood of a 6C rise, making something in the 3C-4C range more likely
In closing @ChiefExecCCC notes that it is now over to Govt to take these targets and do something with the. Next, @theCCCuk will be working on how to deliver these targets.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We have a new paper out today. It's been a bit of a labour of love for me but I'm really proud to share this research we've done looking at how new and emerging technology is reshaping the way government works, and what it means for the workforce:
First: Technology will make some jobs in government redundant through automation. But the vast majority of officials will see their jobs changed rather than replaced. And new jobs will also be created as a result
2/6
Second: Technology isn't just about efficiency, and only looking at is as a way to drive efficiency gains is an unhelpful and narrow lens. There are so many ways that technology can make government more effective, and in many cases it has the potential to do both
3/6
The @theCCCuk has launched its comprehensive report on the UK's sixth carbon budget this morning. Lots of challenges, but also lots of hope for a better future. Thread below covers key points:
- New technology is key, with some behaviour change
- £50bn of investment pa needed
Q: What consideration the CCC gives to new evidence that aviation emissions are causing 3 times more harm than previously estimated. Would a frequent flyer levy be a faster way to reduce aviation emissions?
A: The sooner we cut aviation emissions the better
A: But this report tries to balance the need to reduce emissions with people's want/need to travel. So the scenarios focus on reducing demand growth. Pandemic has supressed demand for flying, and it matters that we cut emissions, but need to see more over time.
On what would have been exit day we have a new @instituteforgov paper for you. This looks back at how Brexit has changed UK Government. This is a phenomenal piece of work, led by @lewisalloyd, a lot to reflect on.
1) Brexit has been expensive. Seven departments have been allocated more than £100m in additional funding, with the Defra being allocated £787.4m and the Home Office getting £935m extra!
2) Brexit has divided the parties at every level. Within the Government this has led to a record number of ministers resigning from post. Initially mostly in favour of a harder Brexit, but increasingly those resigning have done so to vote against things like 'no deal'