We have a new paper out today. It's been a bit of a labour of love for me but I'm really proud to share this research we've done looking at how new and emerging technology is reshaping the way government works, and what it means for the workforce:
First: Technology will make some jobs in government redundant through automation. But the vast majority of officials will see their jobs changed rather than replaced. And new jobs will also be created as a result
2/6
Second: Technology isn't just about efficiency, and only looking at is as a way to drive efficiency gains is an unhelpful and narrow lens. There are so many ways that technology can make government more effective, and in many cases it has the potential to do both
3/6
But managing this transition well requires action from government. As it stands, almost no organisations in government are thinking about automation and what it means for their workforce. They are not prepared to mitigate the challenges and maximise the benefits of new tech
4/6
This is why we are calling for automation to be a central pillar of the government's new people strategy. This needs to direct all organisations in government to think about what this change means for them, and how they will support their workforce through the transition
5/6
There is so much potential here, and the many ways that government is beginning to explore what technology can do are covered in the paper. There are so many great stories here, but the government needs to act now to make the whole piece a story of success for itself.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @theCCCuk has launched its comprehensive report on the UK's sixth carbon budget this morning. Lots of challenges, but also lots of hope for a better future. Thread below covers key points:
- New technology is key, with some behaviour change
- £50bn of investment pa needed
Q: What consideration the CCC gives to new evidence that aviation emissions are causing 3 times more harm than previously estimated. Would a frequent flyer levy be a faster way to reduce aviation emissions?
A: The sooner we cut aviation emissions the better
A: But this report tries to balance the need to reduce emissions with people's want/need to travel. So the scenarios focus on reducing demand growth. Pandemic has supressed demand for flying, and it matters that we cut emissions, but need to see more over time.
Today @theCCCuk publishes it's sixth carbon budget. Opening the launch event @lorddeben makes the case that working against climate change will build the economy.
But getting to net zero will be hard. UK emissions have fallen since 1990, but still have a way to go
Lord Deben: "The longer we wait the harder and more costly it will be to combat climate change"
Chris Stark (@ChiefExecCCC): Today's report describes the journey to the long-term goal of net zero. The CCC has outlined multiple scenarios that get the UK to this goal by 2050: widespread engagement, widespread innovation, headwinds and tailwinds
On what would have been exit day we have a new @instituteforgov paper for you. This looks back at how Brexit has changed UK Government. This is a phenomenal piece of work, led by @lewisalloyd, a lot to reflect on.
1) Brexit has been expensive. Seven departments have been allocated more than £100m in additional funding, with the Defra being allocated £787.4m and the Home Office getting £935m extra!
2) Brexit has divided the parties at every level. Within the Government this has led to a record number of ministers resigning from post. Initially mostly in favour of a harder Brexit, but increasingly those resigning have done so to vote against things like 'no deal'