recent release of documents by HGSAC shows that Warby J made a gross error in a finding of fact in Aven et al v Orbis decision in UK (QB-2018-006349)casemine.com/judgement/uk/5… by adopting Steele lie over an OIG finding (latter dismissed as "hearsay")
2/ HGSAC FBI, p 50 shows matrix of which Steele memos were provided to FBI by various sources. Report 112, at issue in Aven et al, was NOT provided to FBI by Steele directly. FBI got it from journalist David Corn (Mother Jones) on ~ Oct 26; then later from Ohr, McCain, REDACTED.
3/ Horowitz footnote 259 stated that "Crossfire Hurricane team received Report 112 on or about
November 6, 2016, from a Mother Jones journalist through then FBI General Counsel James Baker" (consistent with FBI matrix). Ohr, McCain versions not until December.
4/ Steele testified under oath in Aven case that he had delivered report 112 to FBI in mid-Sept (paras 51), a claim disputed by Plaintiffs. Warby said that this was "only issue in dispute" about disclosures.
5/ on the one disputed issue of fact - whether Steele gave Report 112 to FBI in Sept - Warby found in favor of Steele.
6/ as support for his finding, Warby noted that Steele had provided other memos to FBI, was "enthusiastically briefing" journalists, met with State Dept on Oct 11, all demonstrating Steele's "enthusiasm" for providing US authorities information "of type included in Report 112".
6/ Warby dismissed the OIG footnote as "multiple hearsay evidence from unidentified sources" and preferred the evidence from Steele ("a witness") which he said was "supported to some extent by a contemporaneous document" - Kavalec notes on Oct meeting that did not touch directly.
8/ Warby decided that "on the balance of probabilities, the footnotes are mistaken", due either to erroneous record keeping by the FBI or a mistake in preparation of OIG report or "some other reason".
9/ we now KNOW that OIG footnote was fully supported and documented by FBI matrix document (recently released.) We also see that FBI meticulously documented provenance of various versions in real time. and that their contemporary records show 112 arriving to them from Corn.
10/ in itself, the new information ought to overturn the "balance of probabilities". But there's more.
Steele vehemently contested OIG assertion that Mother Jones journalist had provided report to FBI, loudly asserting that he not provided any part of dossier to journalists.
11/ but the new FBI information lists multiple Steele memos which were provided to Mother Jones journalist David Corn (including Report 112) which the FBI did not then have in their possession.
12/ Steele had been cross-examined on David Corn's possession of reports and claimed not to have given them to Corn.
13/ here's Steele's evidence on issue in deposition.
14/ Steele deposition on this topic continues. Hard to believe that Warby J. gave credence to this bilge while rejecting explicit information in OIG Report based on actual FBI records as "hearsay".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
David Blake argues that nascent psy-op operation is a false flag. He is author of recent, very interesting book Loaed for Guccifer (amazon.com/dp/B08MSZHMGP?…) which argues that Russiagate hoax was an even more broad-reaching false flag than thus far understood.
2/ no sooner does David Blake predict false flag operation than Ellen Nakashima, outlet for original Crowdstrike article on DNC hack on Jun 15, 2016, is stenographer for intel community pearl clutching
in the Dec 3, 2020 HGSAC document drop, there are multiple distribution of Steele dossier version concordances involving 15 FBI agents, of which all but two (Strzok, Moffa) are redacted. There are plausible/probable identifications for 10 of 13 and suggestions for other 3.
2/ here's my current infilling of Steele dossier concordance distribution (h/t walkafyre, Fool_Nelson).
The (CV) is agent from Cleveland: Benjamin Gessford aka "Ben". Stephen Somma from NY has been known for some time; Curtis Heide (CG) from Chicago from Papadop.
3/ Brian Auten is firmly known. Varacalli is IMO firm, both from role and non-redaction in a Jan 2017 email distribution (where Auten also). Moyer and Clinesmith both firm for a long time. Barnett firm relatively recently.
THREAD: Horowitz Report contained under-discussed chapter on bizarre interactions between Ohr, Strzok, Weissmann and Zainab Ahmad during transition, including suspicious Jan 31 and Feb 1 meetings just as resistance was coalescing.
2/ Horowitz reported that Weissmann, Ahmad and Ohr were all engaging in a more or less rogue operation without reporting to or informing their superiors. This ought to have prevented them from being on Special Counsel.
3/ On Jan 31, 2017 - recall that this is period in which attacks on Flynn were drawing blood on the incoming administration - Ahmad and Weissmann asked to see Ohr and Swartz. Ohr didn't attend. But NONE of Swartz, Weissmann, Ahmad "could recall" purpose of this unusual meeting.
@HansMahncke@15poundstogo Hns, the "buckle in" comment refers to a contemporary Ukrainian language article which appeas to be first to report linkage of $1 billion to Shokin firing. While ignored in US media, one commentator on Ciaramella-Ukraine meeting of Jan 19 linked to article. 😁😁
@HansMahncke@15poundstogo OK, here's something very interesting and brand new in this email. The third person notified by Pyatt was Anna Makanju, then Biden's policy adviser. Currently a content censor and regulator for Facebook suppressing anti-Biden commentary.
But now we're seeing Biden was elected [laughter], the traditional elite, the political elite, the establishment, they're very close to Wall Strret, so you see that, right?
Trump has been saying that Biden's son has some sort of global foundation. Have you noticed that?
Important new info on Steele influence and disinformation operation. In transition, Steele operation transferred attention from DNC to McCain via Kramer. On Nov 29, Steele sent "intel snippet" to Kramer sowing discord on Sec State appointment. p66
2/ new drop contains multiple versions of FBI tracking matrix of Steele memos as they received them from all angles. Here is most comprehensive (p 50)
3/ p 51 - what are redactions and why? The attachments to Dec 15, 2016 email were NOT included in disclosure. Why. Agent says that he had "not seen the ne[w] [REDACTED]" but Pete [Strzok] had copies. New what?? Why on earth is this noun redacted? Why is subject partly redacted?