David Blake argues that nascent psy-op operation is a false flag. He is author of recent, very interesting book Loaed for Guccifer (amazon.com/dp/B08MSZHMGP?…) which argues that Russiagate hoax was an even more broad-reaching false flag than thus far understood.
2/ no sooner does David Blake predict false flag operation than Ellen Nakashima, outlet for original Crowdstrike article on DNC hack on Jun 15, 2016, is stenographer for intel community pearl clutching
in the Dec 3, 2020 HGSAC document drop, there are multiple distribution of Steele dossier version concordances involving 15 FBI agents, of which all but two (Strzok, Moffa) are redacted. There are plausible/probable identifications for 10 of 13 and suggestions for other 3.
2/ here's my current infilling of Steele dossier concordance distribution (h/t walkafyre, Fool_Nelson).
The (CV) is agent from Cleveland: Benjamin Gessford aka "Ben". Stephen Somma from NY has been known for some time; Curtis Heide (CG) from Chicago from Papadop.
3/ Brian Auten is firmly known. Varacalli is IMO firm, both from role and non-redaction in a Jan 2017 email distribution (where Auten also). Moyer and Clinesmith both firm for a long time. Barnett firm relatively recently.
THREAD: Horowitz Report contained under-discussed chapter on bizarre interactions between Ohr, Strzok, Weissmann and Zainab Ahmad during transition, including suspicious Jan 31 and Feb 1 meetings just as resistance was coalescing.
2/ Horowitz reported that Weissmann, Ahmad and Ohr were all engaging in a more or less rogue operation without reporting to or informing their superiors. This ought to have prevented them from being on Special Counsel.
3/ On Jan 31, 2017 - recall that this is period in which attacks on Flynn were drawing blood on the incoming administration - Ahmad and Weissmann asked to see Ohr and Swartz. Ohr didn't attend. But NONE of Swartz, Weissmann, Ahmad "could recall" purpose of this unusual meeting.
recent release of documents by HGSAC shows that Warby J made a gross error in a finding of fact in Aven et al v Orbis decision in UK (QB-2018-006349)casemine.com/judgement/uk/5… by adopting Steele lie over an OIG finding (latter dismissed as "hearsay")
2/ HGSAC FBI, p 50 shows matrix of which Steele memos were provided to FBI by various sources. Report 112, at issue in Aven et al, was NOT provided to FBI by Steele directly. FBI got it from journalist David Corn (Mother Jones) on ~ Oct 26; then later from Ohr, McCain, REDACTED.
3/ Horowitz footnote 259 stated that "Crossfire Hurricane team received Report 112 on or about
November 6, 2016, from a Mother Jones journalist through then FBI General Counsel James Baker" (consistent with FBI matrix). Ohr, McCain versions not until December.
@HansMahncke@15poundstogo Hns, the "buckle in" comment refers to a contemporary Ukrainian language article which appeas to be first to report linkage of $1 billion to Shokin firing. While ignored in US media, one commentator on Ciaramella-Ukraine meeting of Jan 19 linked to article. 😁😁
@HansMahncke@15poundstogo OK, here's something very interesting and brand new in this email. The third person notified by Pyatt was Anna Makanju, then Biden's policy adviser. Currently a content censor and regulator for Facebook suppressing anti-Biden commentary.
But now we're seeing Biden was elected [laughter], the traditional elite, the political elite, the establishment, they're very close to Wall Strret, so you see that, right?
Trump has been saying that Biden's son has some sort of global foundation. Have you noticed that?
Important new info on Steele influence and disinformation operation. In transition, Steele operation transferred attention from DNC to McCain via Kramer. On Nov 29, Steele sent "intel snippet" to Kramer sowing discord on Sec State appointment. p66
2/ new drop contains multiple versions of FBI tracking matrix of Steele memos as they received them from all angles. Here is most comprehensive (p 50)
3/ p 51 - what are redactions and why? The attachments to Dec 15, 2016 email were NOT included in disclosure. Why. Agent says that he had "not seen the ne[w] [REDACTED]" but Pete [Strzok] had copies. New what?? Why on earth is this noun redacted? Why is subject partly redacted?