1) Georgia Years-long Court Battle Reveals Dominion’s Security and Audit Flaws, Weak Testing
Rushed implementation of voting system questioned as experts raised fundamental concerns
theepochtimes.com/georgia-years-…
Rushed implementation of voting system questioned as experts raised fundamental concerns
theepochtimes.com/georgia-years-…
2) A review of court documents and sworn expert testimonies raise troubling questions regarding the Dominion voting system and its rushed implementation by the State of Georgia.
3) Among the many issues raised was the inability to accurately audit Dominion’s systems in order to verify that the intended votes were cast as intended.
4) Experts also demonstrated to the court how the Dominion system inherently prevented the successful use of Risk-Limiting Audits (RLAs) - the method employed by Georgia & VotingWorks during the recount.
5) Judge Totenberg agreed with the inability to successfully perform a RLA, noting in her ruling that “there is no audit remedy that can confirm the reliability and accuracy of the BMD system, as Dr. Stark has stressed.”
6) Cybersecurity experts provided evidence to the court that Dominion’s QR system wasn’t secure, was subject to duplication, and that the ability to generate fake QR codes existed.
7) A cybersecurity expert also found that during Georgia’s August 2020 elections, servers at two county election offices he visited “enabled unsafe remote access to the system through a variety of means,” including the use of flash drives.
8) This same expert found that in one of these counties, “server logs were not regularly recording or updated in full and that Dominion’s technical staff maintained control over the logs and made deletions in portions of the logs.”
9) Experts also found significant problems with the testing processes used by Pro V&V.
In a case that involved last-minute updates to Dominion software, the court was told that the testing lab “performed only cursory testing of this new software.”
In a case that involved last-minute updates to Dominion software, the court was told that the testing lab “performed only cursory testing of this new software.”
10) A Dominion system experienced a “memory lockup” after scanning only 4,500 ballots during testing in 2019.
Dominion determined that a “power cycle” is required after scanning more than 4,000 ballots.
It isn’t known if this issue was fixed prior to the 2020 elections.
Dominion determined that a “power cycle” is required after scanning more than 4,000 ballots.
It isn’t known if this issue was fixed prior to the 2020 elections.
11) The court also found that the manner in which the Dominion system functions failed to meet the requirements of Georgia election law.
As U.S. District Judge Amy Judge Totenberg noted, Dominion’s system “does not produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot."
/END
As U.S. District Judge Amy Judge Totenberg noted, Dominion’s system “does not produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot."
/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
