GA Court has discussed inherent flaws:
"Georgia’s use of the new Dominion machines created a particular problem regarding the performance of a successful RLA, precisely because the system “by its nature, erases all direct evidence of voter intent.”"
theepochtimes.com/georgia-years-…
"Georgia’s use of the new Dominion machines created a particular problem regarding the performance of a successful RLA, precisely because the system “by its nature, erases all direct evidence of voter intent.”"
theepochtimes.com/georgia-years-…
Judge Totenberg: “There is no way to tell from a BMD printout what the voter actually saw on the screen, what the voter did with the device, or what the voter heard through the audio interface.”
Totenberg stated in her ruling that a BMD printout “is not trustworthy” and the application of an RLA to an election that used BMD printouts “does not yield a true risk-limiting audit.”
Stark (RLA expert):
“Audits of BMD-marked ballot printouts cannot reliably detect whether malfunctioning BMDs printed the wrong votes or omitted votes or printed extra votes.”
“This is true, even if the malfunctions were severe enough to make losing candidates appear to win.”
“Audits of BMD-marked ballot printouts cannot reliably detect whether malfunctioning BMDs printed the wrong votes or omitted votes or printed extra votes.”
“This is true, even if the malfunctions were severe enough to make losing candidates appear to win.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
