With the PM in Brussels, here is another reminder. On the deal vs no deal. And borders.

We need a deal. It’s in everyone’s interest. It will reduce tariffs (perhaps even full tariff/quota-free) and offer a range of other simplifications. BUT everything will still change

/1
One albeit (over)simplified way of looking at it is 👇

You have a border and what happens behind it.

⏺️Border barriers (friction, formalities, tariffs) and
⏺️Behind the border measures (regulation, alignment, cooperation etc)

/2
On the border barriers front, a deal would remove tariffs.

That's pretty much it.

Plus perhaps some additional simplifications, derogations (maybe some on SPS stuff depending on how far both parties want to go).

/3
A deal wouldn't change that much from a no-deal scenario:

⏺️Customs formalities and checks
⏺️SPS formalities and checks stay
⏺️New requirements to demonstrate products are eligible for tariff-free treatment added (rules of origin)
⏺️Loss of freedom of movement stays

/4
On the behind the border side of things there is so much to cover: product regulation, services, investment etc.

This is where a deal could introduce a number of interesting facilitations. But there is a massive caveat here.

/5
The default position even under a deal will be that the UK is a 3rd country.

In all these areas, FTAs can introduce harmonisation (occasionally alignment), simplifications etc. but the significance of these provisions varies and should not be overestimated.

/6
(Caveat tweet - everything on the behind the border stuff will depend on 1) which area are we talking about 2) what will be agreed and how it will be worded in the text. Range of issues here and by definition I'm oversimplifying things in this 🧵)

/7
FTA will at best minimise the impact. It will not provide continuity in these areas.

And we will gradually begin to see these changes on 1 Jan.

Important to point, nothing has changed yet. Despite all of us talking about little else for 4 years.

/8
The reason I'm tweeting this is cause we keep hearing that a deal will provide a free flow/ frictionless trade/ continuity.

That things will be as they are. As long as we get a deal, it will be alright.

/9
Key point: even with a deal there will be significant changes in almost all areas. Whether it's getting a container in or something as trivial as bringing your pet with you on your holidays.

A lot of these changes aren't clear yet (i.e. we need to see the deal)

/10
So while I will be very glad to see a deal between the UK and the EU, the important part is that the transition period is ending and we're becoming a 3rd country, with all the implications - hopefully one with a good and not too shallow FTA with the EU.

/ends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Anna Jerzewska

Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnnaJerzewska

13 Dec
Just as a reminder - without a freeze/ implementation period or some sort of derogation - no business on either side will be able to use the UK-EU FTA to avoid paying tariffs on 1 Jan even if we get one tomorrow.

It's already too late.

/1
Businesses simply won't have enough time to familiarise themselves with rules of origin, figure out whether their products meet them (larger companies have hundreds of SKUs) and understand what the certification requirements are.

/2
It is expected that companies would be able to self-certify origin under the UK-EU FTA but that is not always that straight forward and sometimes requires prior steps.

/3
Read 7 tweets
12 Dec
🚢This has been happening for the last few months: ships at anchor waiting, shipping lines cancelling orders and diverting, largest shipping lines refusing to accept new bookings

/1


ft.com/content/eb2105…
In the UK, this just the beginning - soon to be accompanied by the perfect Brexit storm.

/2
It was not the shock of the pandemic that sent shockwaves across the entire logistics industry but the rebound of trade in recent months.

/3
Read 5 tweets
10 Dec
It's here! 🚨🚨🚨

/1

gov.uk/government/pub…
And the long-awaited criteria for the determination of goods at risk / not at risk of entering the EU market for GB- NI movements (we've been talking about this one for over a year!)

/2


assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Derogation for SMEs on commercial processing which is part of the "at risk" criteria

/3 Image
Read 12 tweets
9 Dec
And there we have it.

A trusted trader scheme for GB - NI movements to avoid tariffs. Exit declarations from NI to be done by collecting data from transport and ferry companies.

/1
On exit declarations, it's doable, the information will be there. I'm still not convinced that the UK Gov won't at some point need more info (i.e. that this is sustainable) but this is a compromise - no paperwork but some data collection.

/2
I'll wait for further details but it seems like the way the JC has dealt with the famous "at risk" category of goods was by going around it and putting in place a trusted trader programme?

More to follow once we hear from CDL/ see the release

/3
Read 4 tweets
8 Dec
This a crucial bit of info we've all been waiting for. Great to (finally) see some progress.

/1
Seems to cover all the important bits:
Goods at risk
BCPs and a range of SPS related issues
supplied to supermarkets and
state aid

/2
Most importantly perhaps, this 👇

/3
Read 4 tweets
7 Dec
This is really concerning. Two main problems remain

1⃣ Implementation of the Protocol itself
2⃣ Layering it with a deal if one emerges

/1
1⃣ Hopefully it's obvious how important it is for businesses to understand which goods will be subject to tariffs (the goods at risk question). However it's starting to be less and less relevant as time goes by

/2
Whatever the "at risk" logic will be companies will need to provide some sort of proof that their goods/consignments meet the criteria.

They will not be able to do so overnight.

/3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!