I thought Johns Hopkins was an abolitionist. Now we've come to find out that the was a slaver?

WHAT THE FUCK, WHITE PEOPLE? What in the actual FUCK? Y'all didn't even do your research on who held people in bondage and who was AGAINST DOING THAT?
Maybe he could have given that "largest bequest in American history" (at that time) to, I don't know, the Black people he FUCKING OWNED??
Sorry, I don't know why this is *bothering* me. I am familiar with white people.

It's just, Jesus, I WAS TOLD THAT THE HOSPITAL SCHOOL GUY WAS AN ABOLITIONIST. Not merely a not-slaver, but an ACTUAL ABOLITIONIST. The FUQ?
Me: It feels like every time you bother to LEARN, you find out white people were even SHITTIER than you freaking thought.

@nhannahjones:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elie Mystal

Elie Mystal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ElieNYC

18 Nov
Make no mistake, what the GOP is trying to do right now is apartheid. They are trying to literally make it so the votes of black people straight up do not count.
In this particular Michigan situation, the state board should certify the results by December 13th. So says the Michigan Sec of State. So on the binary question of "is this the coup" we're still at a "no."

But, jesus, what the GOP is willing to do right now is shocking.
The Democrats simply *must* win the runoffs in Georgia and put at stop to these attempts to disenfranchise black people, or, failing that they must have the most aggressive executive order plan in history to stop Republicans from doing this.
Read 4 tweets
13 Nov
Yeaaahhhh... Alito is a monster.
He gave a speech at @FedSoc and, while I’m still waiting on the full translation from the original German, it seems pretty bad.
He doesn’t like gay people a lot. Or science. Or the First Amendment unless you’re using it to bash gay people.
It’s bad. He’s very bad.
Alito is why some people call the Iraq War Bush’s *second* biggest mistake.
Read 5 tweets
10 Nov
Remember the subtext of what's going on with the ACA. Congress zeroed out the mandate *to MAKE the ACA unconstitutional.* But there's a really strong court preference for assuming Congress DOESN'T make it's own laws constitutional on purpose.
So the defenders are saying "see, of course the rest of the ACA is constitutional b/c Congress OBVIOUSLY wouldn't make its own laws unconstitutional." While attackers are saying "But, but, this is our trick. Our trick is allowed to work now."
Thomas and Alito are like "GOOD TRICK, LET'S KILL IT NOW." Kav (and *maybe* ACB) are like "but, why would this trick actually work?" Breyer and Sotomayor are like: "FUCK YOU, GHOULS, WE'RE NOT DUMB." Roberts and Kagan are like "WHY is this case even here? JUST GO AWAY."
Read 4 tweets
7 Nov
Meh, I'll call this good news from Alito. Basically this SCOTUS case was
GOP: We want to get ballots received after ED separated
Alito: Isn't that what's happening?
GOP: Yes. But can you say it again?
Alito: Okay. It is said again.
GOP: What about...
Alito: Shut up.
Like this would be a problem is counties weren't already separated these disputed ballots (they are) or if there were enough disputed ballots to change the result in PA (we don't know but probably not), that Trump was going to win in large numbers (he won't).
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
Dude, Pennsylvania, ANSWER @rehemaellis's question about how many "segregated" ballots they have. She's asking because THAT'S THE ENTIRE BASIS OF TRUMP'S STUPID COURT CASE.

CHRIST. LISTEN TO BLACK WOMEN!!!
GOD, that was frustrating. Most likely we're talking about less then a FRACTION of what would be necessary to overturn the results in PA.

ANSWERING THIS ONE QUESTION ALLOWS EVERY REPORTER TO KNOCK DOWN TRUMP'S CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY. And they wouldn't and weren't prepared to.
Thank you for trying @rehemaellis. I see you. You STAY on point.
Read 4 tweets
5 Nov
Since people want to do the "faithless electors" thing again, let's recap:
* Court says states CAN ENFORCE electors to vote like the voters tell them.
* States who want to let electors vote their conscience needed to make that call BEFORE the election.
* None did.
Yes. Obviously, the Supreme Court can always say "You know what tho, we really want Trump to be President so actually anything you do to make that happen is cool by us."

That's always possible. But, I'm just saying that the GOP is not *supposed* to be able to do this.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!