10 mins in front of the news was enough to drive me to intense frustration.
The Tory party 'line to take' today is that the unbridgeable divide is the result of the failure of the EU to recognise that the UK is an independent sovereign state.
It is nonsense. THREAD. 1/11
Brexit involves the UK making a sovereign decision to leave the EU. And, in January 2020 the UK duly left the EU. 2/11
As a member of the EU, the UK was part of the single market. The single market is a complex web of rules and presumptions which seeks to eliminate trade barriers between the EU member states. 3/11
It relies on the adoption of EU harmonisation legislation (via a tolerably democratic supranational decision-making structure), and on the enforcement of EU rules by national and EU level courts. 4/11
It relies on trust and cooperation between member states, and on institutions at EU (eg the Commission and the CJEU) and the national level which are able to enforce the rules. 5/11
Now... the UK has decided to leave the EU and leave the single market. Different actors are pursuing different agendas. These two arguments are often made. 6/11
First, the 'point' of Brexit is the freedom to diverge from EU standards and rules and the freedom to make our own regulatory choices. 7/11
And second, attempts to enforce any obligations in any deal, especially with reference to EU law, are strongly rejected. As are any common institutions which might have an element of jurisdiction over the UK and its future choices. 8/11
I don't think that anyone is questioning the UK's sovereign right to set its own rules, and to establish its own enforcement mechanisms. 9/11
Instead, the argument is about the consequences, in particular as regards ease of access to the EU's market, of particular exercises of the UK's sovereignty. 10/11
The fundamental misunderstanding it is not about the fact that the UK is sovereign, but instead about the nature of the (sovereign) desire of the EU-27 to protect the single market. 11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There are a lot of Brexiters in the media this week making points about sovereignty, and about how the EU has not come to terms with the UK's independence.
I have some questions, which it might well be fruitful to ask them. 1/9
1. How do you understand the concept of sovereignty? What are the circumstances in which you might agree to make binding commitments to other independent states or trading blocs? 2/
2. What sort of commitments are you prepared to make in order to get trade deals with other states/blocs? And, to what end (why not trade on Australian-style terms with the wider world)? 3/
One of the root causes of the Govt's Brexit difficulties is that it has overpromised.
We can, it is said, reclaim our sovereignty, with the freedom to make our own rules, and, at the same time, retain many of the advantages of EU membership. 1/14
The reality is that we cannot.
Unless we agree to certain standards and rules (and there is scope to argue about which rules), there will be borders, and checks, and tariffs. 2/
There will always be a relationship between rights (eg tariff free access to EU/UK markets) and responsibilities (eg abiding by level-playing field commitments). 3/
The Govt makes a strong case for continuing with restrictions and for the dangers of 'letting it rip'.
But it does nothing to explain why the particular decisions on education, sports, pubs, and household mixing have been made. 2/4
I would surprised if appeases any of the potential rebels... and think that the pressure to lift restrictions for particular sectors, and regions, will likely increase. 3/4
The Govt, the Opposition, and the real Opposition. Some thoughts on Govt, Labour and the ERG/CRG.
Thread. 1/16
This is a Govt which is interested in the pursuit, and retention, of power (see this blog). It aims for short-term popularity, and is acutely sensitive to the public mood. 2/
Lots of talk again today about @UKLabour's positioning on Brexit.
I don't think that finding the right path as complicated as many seem to believe. Thread. 1/19 (sorry it is so long!)
Big picture. We have left the EU. A deal will, or will not, be done in the next month. We are facing either a 'hard Brexit' deal, or 'no deal'. There is no prospect of a 'soft Brexit' (customs union and/or single market membership). 2/
This, from @AntonSpisak on 'what to look for in any deal' is an excellent summary of the - many - live issues.
“My advice is that the Home Secretary has not consistently met the high standards required by the Ministerial Code of treating her civil servants with consideration and respect... 3/