5/ But if Bitcoiners were split on the idea. The author made it clear he thought #Bitcoin might be ready for primetime.
After all, he argued #BTC was then increasingly being used in trade.
6/ More people, he noted, were running the client and mining #Bitcoin for a chance to earn rewards.
At that time, someone running the software could expect to receive 50 BTC every 3 weeks.
7/ Back then, the article shows the idea that #Bitcoin was a βstore of valueβ or that it had βintrinsic valueβ (as an alternative to state money) hadnβt yet been embraced.
The accepted thesis was bitcoins had value as it was payment βfor services and goods.β
8) Other #Bitcoin descriptions are more familiar. You can tell the author was enamored with the idea Bitcoin could be an unstoppable software for value exchange.
Given the internet censorship, this censorship-resistance made Bitcoin a powerful tool.
9) Was the author fully convinced of #Bitcoinβs success?
No, but he speculated it could be a tool to inhibit government overreach on the internet.
10) Despite the positive review, one Bitcoiner wasnβt a fan. That would be Satoshi Nakamoto, who thought the attention could be catastrophic.