Trad Bhai Log, Yahan Se shuru karo ye fifth Shankaracharya ki mystery janane ke liye.
1/2
Kanchi Kamakoti Math - A Myth
archive.org/details/Kanchi…
There is another one. It was removed from Archive.org withing 3 days of me tweeting some screenshots from it.

Agar chahiye to main Google Doc link share kar doonga.

"Truth About Kumbakonam Mutt"
by
Krishnaswamy Aiyer R., Venkatraman K. R.
2/2
Sorry, ek aur hai. Read these three books to unravel the mystery of fifth Shankarachara peeth of Kumbhakonam (Kanchi).

"Conflicting hagiographies and history: The place of Śaṅkaravijaya texts in Advaita tradition"
by Vidyasankar Sundaresan
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Arre Bhai Joker ki to kuch respect hoti hai. hum to Modi Bhajan Mandali wale bhakt hain. Lekin aap log to non-compromising alpha-Trad hain. So demand Kanchi peeth to stop defiling Adi Sankara's tradition and if it doesn't agrees then demand action.

This post by Vidyasankar Sundaresan , author of the book mentioned in abv tweet.

"It is generally accepted as tradition that Adi Sankaracharya, the famous Advaita philosopher, founded four maths (monasteries) at Sringeri, Puri, Dwaraka and Badrinath;
1/
None of the four recognized mathas claims jurisdiction over the other three. However, the Kanchi math claims that Sankaracharya established a fifth math in Kanchi, with jurisdiction over the recognized four mathas;
2/
that Sankaracharya ascended a sarvagna-pitha not in Kashmir, but at Kanchi, and that he passed away not in Kedarnath, but at Kanchi.
3/
These and other such claims have been widely publicized by the followers of the Kanchi math with the direct participation of and encouragement from the heads of the Kanchi math, including the recently departed centenarian Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati (C.S., for short)
4/
and his successor Sri Jayendra Saraswati (J.S.).

In Tamil, we have a saying "Do not question the origins of rivers (nadimoolam) and rishis (rishimoolam)."
5/
Still, in terms of answering some basic questions regarding dates in Indian history, one has to perforce look at these. C.S. had a commanding personality. He impressed people of such wide interests as Mahatma Gandhi, Arthur Koestler, Paul Brunton, Milton Singer etc.
6/
Some of his more ardent followers have gone to the
extent of deifying him as "Nadamadum deivam"-the deity who walks.People compose and sing songs in his praise, and dancers stage dance-dramas on his life-all of which are widely advertised and reviewed in the south Indian press.
However, while some people might respect the recently departed acharya of Kanchi as a rishi or as a deity, there is no reason why a frank discussion cannot be held regarding the origins of the Kanchi math, and C.S.'s involvement in propagating a thoroughly revised history of
8/
that math - so thoroughly revised as to be almost wholly falsified. I would like to clarify at the outset that no disrespect is meant to the Kanchi math or its heads, but while talking of some aspects of history, one has to call a spade a spade."
9/
One can read the whole post here. I will just post the summary below.
10/
advaita-vedanta.org/avhp/alt_hindu…
"To sum up, the claims of the Kanchi math have been unprecedented in the history of Hinduism. We have never had an organized structure comparable to the Roman Catholic Church.
11/
In the event, a math in the remote south claiming to be the central math of the Advaita sampradaya makes no sense. Firstly, such centralized religious jurisdiction is alien to the spirit and history of our culture.
12/
Secondly, even if Adi Sankaracharya did establish a central math with jurisdiction over the recognized four, was he so ignorant of India's geography that he bypassed all holy cities with more central locations (Prayag/Kashi/Ujjain?) and chose instead Kanchi in the extreme south?
THUS, THE IDEA OF A CENTRAL MATH IS CLEARLY PURE MYTH. THE REALITY IS THAT THE KANCHI MATH IS A RELATIVELY RECENT INSTITUTION WITH TALL CLAIMS. That it has a large following is an undeniable fact.
14/
Every saffron-robed person invariably attracts some following. Couple that with the tremendous charisma that C.S. had, and a famous temple like the Kamakshi temple in Kanchipuram - one has a ready-made formula for success
in attracting a following.
15/
The sad part is that the sannyasis involved take advantage of the general reverence that people show them, for their
own ulterior motives. "
16/16

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with हिरण्यरेता

हिरण्यरेता Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Hiranyareta

13 Dec
Someone asked me why only three Vedas mentioned by Manu here? Why not four? Probably hinting at Padre Indologist claim that original Vedas were only three and not four.
Here is the explanation. It's in Hindi though.
1/
"वेद चार प्रकार का है- ऋग्वेद, यजुर्वेद, सामवेद और अथर्ववेद । पहले तीन वेदों का नाम ऋक् आदि तीन प्रकार की रचना के अनुरोध से हुआ और चौथे अथर्व-वेद का नाम अध्ययन के कारण से हुआ।
आशय यह है कि जहांपर छन्दके वश पाद(भाग या हिस्सा) की व्यवस्था की जाय वह ऋक्; जहां गान के अनुकूल व्यवस्था हो वह साम; और जहां छन्द तथा गानसे अतिरिक्त गद्यभाग हो वह यजु कहलाता है । यहः ऋक्, साम तथा, यजु का लक्षण जैमिनि-मुनि ने कहाहै- :
Read 8 tweets
13 Dec
This book was published in 1917. 🤣🤣

"एकादशी सर्वमान्य व्रत है पर इसका अत्याचार दो देशों में अधिक देखा जाता है । एक वङ्ग (बंगाल) में, जहां अदीक्षित बालविधवा भी एकादशी के घोर नियमों से मृतप्राय करडाली जाती हैं। धन्य हैं वङ्गपण्डित महाशय।
1/2

archive.org/stream/ManuSmr…
दूसरे अयोध्याप्रान्त में किसी किसी स्थान पर एकादशी के दिन हाथी घोड़े दाना नहीं पाते। "

2/2
"....मनुस्मृति में वही लोग क्षेपक कह सकते हैं जो वैदिकरहस्य नहीं जानते हैं, अथवा जो कोई शब्दत: किंवा अर्थतः वेद के कण्टक हैं। यहां एक सुप्रसिद्ध उदाहरण दिखलाया जाता है-
"न मांसभक्षणे दोपो न मद्ये न च मैथुने।
प्रवृत्तिरेषां भूतानां निवृत्तिस्तुं महाफला॥"
(मनु ५ अध्याय ५६ श्लोक)1/
Read 8 tweets
11 Dec
"घनघनाया" 🤣🤣🤣

Ye Shabda Hindi ki kisi dictionary mein nahin milega.😊

Mard-e-Momin Jahan dekhate hain ki laat kha jaayenge wahan apni Auraton ko aage kar dete hain.😊
@shahid_siddiqui @RanaAyyub @khanumarfa
And Yogi Ji is a sekoolar onlee!!😉

Read 8 tweets
11 Dec
Describing assembly of self realized Mahatmas as mobile Prayagraj Tulsidas writes in RCM:

“मुद मंगलमय संत समाजू। जो जग जंगम तीरथराजू ॥
राम भक्ति जहँ सुरसरि धारा। सरसइ ब्रह्म बिचार प्रचारा ॥
बिधि निषेधमय कलि मल हरनी। करम कथा रबिनंदनि बरनी ॥” 1/
So in RCM, कर्मकांड (Yamuna Ji) and उपासना कांड (Ganga Ji) are obvious (प्रत्यक्ष) but ज्ञानकांड (Saraswati) isn’t so. It’s गुप्त.
If you map Abrahamic cults to पारंपरिक त्रिकांड model of Vedas then they fall under Upasana Kanda. 2/
That’s why Padres and Indologists(under subconscious belief that Xianity is highest form of religion) hype Upasana Kanda as whole sole of Hinduism as it resonates with Christianity. 3/
Read 8 tweets
11 Dec
"भगवान् कृष्ण ने जब देह छोड़ा तो उनका अंतिम संस्कार किया गया , उनका सारा शरीर तो पांच तत्त्व में मिल गया...."

काँग्रेसिये कहाँ-२ से बकवास निकाल कर ले आते हैं?

1/
facebook.com/shrikedarnathd…
लगता है कश्मीरी यवन नेहरु की रोमिला थापर और इरफान हबीब रचित सेकूलर काँग्रेसी महाभारत में ऐसा लिखा होगा जिसमे श्रीकृष्ण का शरीर पंचभूत से बना हुआ है।
2/
कम्युनिष्ट, काँग्रेसी और "साइंटिफिक सोच" वाले लोग राम और कृष्ण के शरीर को पंचभूत से बना बताये तो समझ में आता है लेकिन "केदारनाथ धाम" के नाम वाला हैंडल ऐसी बात करे तो इसका एक ही अर्थ है कि यह फेसबुक हैंडल कोई सेकूलर-सवर्ण चला रहा है।
3/
Read 9 tweets
10 Dec
Agar ye Shankaracharya hain to phir Adhokshananda se kya problem hai?

Kumbhakonam Mutt kare to Havan Aur Adhokshananda (waise uske peeche bhee Sekoolar-Savarna hee hain) kare to Pradooshan?
Mutt khol sakate hain but Shankaracharya nahin ho sakte. Shankaracharya sirf chaar hain aur agar koi anya apne ko declare kare to jail jaayega 420 mein, aisa SC ka order hai.
No, SC ruling is about anybody claiming himself to be Shankaracharya. Not just making claim on 4 original ones.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!