Every single lawyer representing Trump in the post-election litigation should be tossed out of the legal profession lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2020/12/disbar…
To reiterate what should not require reiteration, the 6th Amendment means that people have a right to counsel in criminal cases. It does not entail a "right" to file frivolous or abusive claims, let alone sub-frivolous claims intended to delegitimize an election.
TX v. PA is a systematic Rule 11 violation, not a lawsuit. Nothing in it even approaches a legal argument, and the statistical non-evidence is the very definition of "not even wrong." lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2020/12/texas-…
Pennsylvania's frank reply brief to the state of Texas's attempt to destroy American democracy it worth reading in its entirety: 
:But Texas obviously lacks standing to bring such claims, which, in any event, are barred by laches, and are moot, meritless, and dangerous." Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln...
"Seditious" is a precisely accurate description of the Attorney General who filed this suit and the Attorneys General who have filed briefs supporting it.
"Democrat [sic]"
"it should not be necessary to point out
that the 2016 and 2020 elections were, in fact, separate
events, and any analysis based on the assumption that
voters in a particular state would behave the same way
in two successive presidential elections is worthless"
that the 2016 and 2020 elections were, in fact, separate
events, and any analysis based on the assumption that
voters in a particular state would behave the same way
in two successive presidential elections is worthless"
"Given the global pandemic, many States were
forced to modify their election process, including mail-in voting procedures. Texas did."
forced to modify their election process, including mail-in voting procedures. Texas did."
Texas's argument is, literally, that it violates the 14th Amendment not to engage in vote suppression.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
