The GOP spent most of 2020 rejecting science in the face of a deadly pandemic; now it's rejecting democracy in the face of a clear election loss. How did we get to this point? One step at a time, of course. But I'd argue that the wrong turn began under Reagan 1/
Republicans have, of course, done their best to beatify Reagan — mainly on the basis of an economic recovery that he didn't cause and the collapse of Communism, which he also didn't cause. What actually happened on his watch? 2/
Well, for one thing it was the beginning of the great mortality divergence. America used to have about the same life expectancy as other rich countries; since 1980, however, we've fallen far behind 3/
One contributing factor was a huge rise in income inequality, partly attributable to Reagan's policies, including union-bashing. 4/
People also forget how anti-science Reagan was; he denounced evolution as "just a theory" and wanted creationism taught in schools 6/
And while the practice of equating patriotism with political support for the current president (as long as he's a Republican) didn't start with Reagan — Nixon did it too — it got much more intense, paving the way for the Trump cult of personality 7/
As Adam Smith said, there is a great deal of ruin in a nation. America had and still has many strengths as a society. But given time and persistence, a malign political movement can undo those strengths. I'm very frightened about the future 8/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many of the headlines on the new administration offer get it wrong by emphasizing the headline cost, which makes it sound serious. The key thing is the refusal to extend unemployment benefits, which is cruel and stupid 1/ huffpost.com/entry/covid19-…
THIS IS NOT ABOUT STIMULUS. As some of us emphasized all along, when a pandemic is raging the goal shouldn't be to goose the economy but to provide disaster relief to those who can't work because their usual jobs spread the virus 2/
The paradox of the Trump economy: the economy did pretty well even though his two main policy initiatives — cutting taxes on corporations to encourage investment and tariffs to reduce trade deficits — were busts. Here's business investment: 1/
And here's trade: 2/
So what did go right? As I've been saying, inadvertent and unadmitted Keynesianism: big increase in cyclically adjusted deficits, driving demand 3/
So, I was too busy to comment on the jobs numbers this AM. But let's step back: you should see where we are in the context of Trump's decision, back in April, to stop fighting the virus and in fact bully states into relaxing restrictions 1/
This was supposed to lead to rapid economic recovery; in fact, after a few months the recovery slowed and has now effectively stalled, with the US still ~10 million jobs down 2/
Meanwhile, the virus was supposed to go away; instead, 200,000 more people have died, with high likelihood that another 100,000 or more will die before Trump leaves office 3/
Now, many people will surely start waving around frightening-looking projections, like those of the CBO 2/ cbo.gov/publication/56…
But while I respect CBO's integrity, those long-run debt projections are much more questionable than people probably realize. Realistic projections, I (and many sensible economists) argue, are much less alarming 3/
More on fiscal issues: once Biden is in office, expect Rs to wave around a lot of charts purporting to show a dangerous long-run debt trajectory. And to be fair, long-term CBO projections show a big rise in debt 1/
But what's driving those projections? Mainly it's rising interest costs — which in turn are driven largely by the assumption that rates will rise a lot 2/
But as Furman and Summers point out, CBO has consistently projected big rate increases that haven't happened 3/ piie.com/system/files/d…
This is going to be a very dark and tragic winter — especially tragic because so many Americans are going to die unnecessarily 1/ nytimes.com/2020/11/27/hea…
We've known since the early days of the pandemic that it was crucial to flatten the curve to avoid overloading the health care system 2/ nytimes.com/article/flatte…
And the case for flattening the curve is especially strong now that we know that a vaccine is on the way: at this point an infection postponed for a few months may well be an infection avoided 3/