Today's digital advertising based on selling user data to the highest bidder has been called the 'largest data breach ever', and yes:
Two firms who sell targeted+mass surveillance to governments are hoovering phone location data from the ad/rtb bidstream: forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
One of the players, Bsightful, is part-owned by the US surveillance giant Verint, who reportedly supplied phone tapping tech to the NSA.
The other, Rayzone, sells a "Global Virtual SIGINT" system that promises "wide, diverse and in-depth information on global internet users".
According to Forbes, Bsightful is "hoovering up app location data by running what’s known as a Demand Side Platform (DSP)".
That way, they can collect "location and other phone data the app developers are willfully providing, the data passing through [the so-called] bidstream".
Here's how personal data on website visitors and app users is being constantly leaked to myriads of data companies within milliseconds in today's online advertising ecosystem.
Digital profiles based on this data are used for all kinds of purposes.
In 2019, the UK data protection authority stated that most of today's online advertising in the EU is illegal at a "general, systemic" level because it's based on thousands of websites+apps sharing personal data on millions without a legal basis every day.
I'm sorry for publishers who are still relying on it, but they had years to fix it. Authorities do not enforce the GDPR because they don't want to interfere with their business but it's enough now.
While we have the GDPR in the EU that *could* end this deliberately designed, ongoing, large-scale data breach, if enforced, there is no appropriate federal privacy/dataprotection law in the US at all.
At least, some members of US Congress care about it:
To be precise, what Forbes/@iblametom found is that:
- Bsightful (affiliated with Verint) is running a white-label DSP to harvest data from bid requests, according to two sources, and packages it "for government customers, allowing them to search whole areas or for individuals"
- Rayzone promises to provide intelligence and law enforcement agencies with "wide, diverse and in-depth information on global internet users" including "location data collected from smartphone ads" and/or "mobile apps", according to Forbes' sources. Further details are not known
Forbes' sources also said that the two are among "a handful" of surveillance firms who are targeting the mobile advertising ecosystem.
I'm pretty sure they use both RTB and mobile SDK data, also obtained from other data brokers, probably in addition to cell tower and other data.
In recent months, we have learned about US government contractors and suppliers based in the EU doing similar things.
Anyway, to my knowledge, this Forbes report provides evidence for the first time that a company who sells surveillance to governments is running its own DSP.
Web and app publishers should be aware that they are (legally) responsible if personal data on their visitors and users they share with unknown parties in the context of digital advertising and marketing is being misused.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
argyle.com, a US startup that aims to aggregate employment records across employers, including data on work activities and reputation, and sell it to recruiters, lenders, insurers. It claims it has already access to 40m records.
This is terrifying + shouldn't exist.
"The short term objective for Argyle is access to 100% of employment records; the reason for fundraising at this moment is to quicken the date of 100% access"
"We started with building coverage where Equifax has not - in the gig economy" notion.so/Argyle-A-Round…
US data brokers have been gathering+selling data on work history/salary for decades, which also shouldn't happen. Argyle's sales pitch suggests they want to go far beyond that.
Predicio, a French data broker who was caught selling location data harvested from ordinary smartphone apps to the US defense contractor Venntel, also provides 'foot traffic data' in partnership with Aspectum, another US company who sells to law enforcement and homeland security.
Aspectum (aka EOS Data Analytics) claims to provide 'geospatial insight based on cell phone activity and other data sources for a better understanding of local social interaction hazards' such as 'demonstrations, protests, riots, and other mass civil disorder acts', for example.
As a part of a 'combined offer from Aspectum and Predicio', that 'enables' clients 'to track and analyze human activities', 'foot traffic data' is 'available for selected countries' including the US and most EU countries.
Microsoft Teams for Education knows what students are doing late at night.
It also knows what students are doing early in the morning, at individual level.
Generally, MS Teams for Education has extensive student monitoring capabilities built in.
Its 'Insights' tool can track which meetings students attend and for how long, what tabs they view, if they open files, post messages, reply or react with emojis. edudownloads.azureedge.net/msdownloads/Mi…
Esoteric metrics based on analyzing extensive data about employee activities has been mostly the domain of fringe software vendors. Now it's built into MS 365.
A new feature to calculate 'productivity scores' turns Microsoft 365 into an full-fledged workplace surveillance tool:
Employers/managers can analyze employee activities at the individual level (!), for example, the number of days an employee has been sending emails, using the chat, using 'mentions' in emails etc.
Showing data on individuals can be turned off, but it's activated *by default*. This normalizes extensive workplace surveillance in a way not seen before.
I don't think employers can legally use it in most EU countries. I'm sure they cannot legally use it in Austria and Germany.