Microsoft Teams for Education knows what students are doing late at night.
It also knows what students are doing early in the morning, at individual level.
Generally, MS Teams for Education has extensive student monitoring capabilities built in.
Its 'Insights' tool can track which meetings students attend and for how long, what tabs they view, if they open files, post messages, reply or react with emojis. edudownloads.azureedge.net/msdownloads/Mi…
The road to always-on surveillance hell is paved with good intentions.
"We collect data for Insights when Education Analytics is turned on for the tenant"
The problem starts when companies are selling the hell out of data/tech solutions without addressing ANY pitfalls let alone doing broader impact assessments.
"Spotlight cards cut through the data to automatically show you trends, habits, and behaviors of students in your class. This helps to show new views of classroom activity that may not have been visible before"
Stating that there is 'no personal data' in the reports when personal data (under almost any definition) is actually all over them …this is meant to appease educators + doesn't happen by accident.
I'm sorry but this is corporate misinformation.
So, what are the issues?
- Microsoft introduces a reporting tool that touches on the private lives of students
- It is turned on by default, and thus helps to further normalize student monitoring
- It encourages teachers to rely on data rather than on interpersonal communication
- Some reports seem to be crude (e.g. overly precise)
- There are no options to fine tune what is being reported
- There are no resources that assess the impact on students, discuss concerns or encourage responsible use
- Microsoft uses misleading language to appease educators
Not least, I doubt that 'Insights' as described by MS materials can be legally used under the GDPR.
Of course, teachers need tools to take care of students under pandemic conditions. In a responsible way. But providing such tools is a slippery slope. And Microsoft failed, again.
And of course, MS is not alone. There are other vendors, both small and very large, who provide educational technology and learning analytics based on invasive student monitoring, irresponsible tech solutionism and/or flawed metrics aka 'quantify everything no matter how stupid'.
Oh, I forgot to mention, Microsoft Teams for Education also knows what students are doing at the weekend.
argyle.com, a US startup that aims to aggregate employment records across employers, including data on work activities and reputation, and sell it to recruiters, lenders, insurers. It claims it has already access to 40m records.
This is terrifying + shouldn't exist.
"The short term objective for Argyle is access to 100% of employment records; the reason for fundraising at this moment is to quicken the date of 100% access"
"We started with building coverage where Equifax has not - in the gig economy" notion.so/Argyle-A-Round…
US data brokers have been gathering+selling data on work history/salary for decades, which also shouldn't happen. Argyle's sales pitch suggests they want to go far beyond that.
Predicio, a French data broker who was caught selling location data harvested from ordinary smartphone apps to the US defense contractor Venntel, also provides 'foot traffic data' in partnership with Aspectum, another US company who sells to law enforcement and homeland security.
Aspectum (aka EOS Data Analytics) claims to provide 'geospatial insight based on cell phone activity and other data sources for a better understanding of local social interaction hazards' such as 'demonstrations, protests, riots, and other mass civil disorder acts', for example.
As a part of a 'combined offer from Aspectum and Predicio', that 'enables' clients 'to track and analyze human activities', 'foot traffic data' is 'available for selected countries' including the US and most EU countries.
Today's digital advertising based on selling user data to the highest bidder has been called the 'largest data breach ever', and yes:
Two firms who sell targeted+mass surveillance to governments are hoovering phone location data from the ad/rtb bidstream: forbes.com/sites/thomasbr…
One of the players, Bsightful, is part-owned by the US surveillance giant Verint, who reportedly supplied phone tapping tech to the NSA.
The other, Rayzone, sells a "Global Virtual SIGINT" system that promises "wide, diverse and in-depth information on global internet users".
According to Forbes, Bsightful is "hoovering up app location data by running what’s known as a Demand Side Platform (DSP)".
That way, they can collect "location and other phone data the app developers are willfully providing, the data passing through [the so-called] bidstream".
Esoteric metrics based on analyzing extensive data about employee activities has been mostly the domain of fringe software vendors. Now it's built into MS 365.
A new feature to calculate 'productivity scores' turns Microsoft 365 into an full-fledged workplace surveillance tool:
Employers/managers can analyze employee activities at the individual level (!), for example, the number of days an employee has been sending emails, using the chat, using 'mentions' in emails etc.
Showing data on individuals can be turned off, but it's activated *by default*. This normalizes extensive workplace surveillance in a way not seen before.
I don't think employers can legally use it in most EU countries. I'm sure they cannot legally use it in Austria and Germany.