"Social media platforms rarely provide data to misinformation researchers" This is a problem @IrenePasquetto@Briony_Swire argue, as "scientists are often left working with partial or biased data and must rush to archive relevant data" before it is removed misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/tackli…
"The line between what platforms deem illegitimate algorithmic manipulation and legitimate strategy is nebulous and largely reflective of their material interests" @cbpetre et al argues,casting "companies as neutral actors" upholding authenticity+integrity doi.org/10.1177/205630…
Good day to re-up: “Problematic information is often simply one step further on a continuum with mainstream partisan news or even well-known politicians" @alicetiara writes. "We should [not] ignore platforms" but misinfo also about identity,politics,&media georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/upl…
In contexts "where the state exercises a great deal of control" over the media @admire2mare et al writes, "alternative sources ... often assume the position of the “truth news media” whereas the mainstream public media become symbols of “false news media” tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Platforms represent a distinct type of governance, "different from markets, hierarchies, or networks, and therefore pose a unique set of problems for regulators, workers, and their competitors in the conventional economy" @spvallas and @JulietSchor write doi.org/10.1146/annure…
Interviews with journalists in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan by @SamanthaPeko et al shows how mobile tech is expensive and often difficult to access, but also "helps them overcome press restrictions" for example by going "live" via mobile and social media tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Good for me, bad for you/us? @martinriedl et al find third-person dynamic. Perceived negative effects of social media "are stronger for others than for oneself" & "beneficial effects of social media [perceived] to be stronger for the self than for society" tandfonline.com/eprint/VIPNTAA…
(1) "state-society relationship shapes communication technology" (2) "increasing pluralization ... shapes how communication technology is used" (3) quest for self in Chinese/Indian modernity provide references to other contexts @WeiyuZ@TaberezNeyazi argue doi.org/10.1080/238089…
Analysing survey data from 🇮🇩 @taberez@BurhanMuhtadi find "political use of social media is not associated with belief in misinformation" but "partisanship is strongly associated with belief in various types of misinformation" depending on who is targeted ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc…
The"law ‘On news aggregators’ exemplifies the diversification of Russian regulation of online news from controlling content and targeting content producers towards governing the algorithmic infrastructures that shape news dissemination" @Marielle_W_ argues journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
"Homophobia within the news media, journalists’ lack of awareness and/or understanding of the social concerns of lesbian, gay and bisexual people, public pressure and lack of communication"contribute to social exclusion @sanemLSJ shows based on interviews journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
“Covert racism is felt powerfully at media institutions which [present] taking diversity seriously”,Douglas finds,“interviewees who’ve worked for public service broadcasters and liberal newspapers explain feeling this seeing of race is a branding exercise” journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
Developments after 2014 Indian election "demonstrate a continuity in the media’s relationship with dominant members of the political elite" @swatiullas & Sparks argue, as "the journalistic field reorients its subservience towards the new power structure." journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
"A myriad of individual factors, such as gender, race, and religiosity" shape news use patterns, so while partisanship IS a driver of fragmentation in the US, research need to extend well beyond ideological selectivity, @pengyilang and @tianyangyt argue journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
"Disinformation studies remains relatively silent about questions of identity, motivation, labor, and morality" @jonathan_c_ong and Cabañes argue,analyze conditions enticing "people to this work and the creative industry practices that normalize fake news" ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc…
Here, @LuzhouLi identifies 3 "types of policy practices that are marked by policy opacity rather than policy visibility", 1) lacunae in policy outcomes+agendas; 2) policy ‘undecisions’ and 3) ‘considered silence’ that refers to government non-intervention journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ask scientists about peer review, and you’ll get… a lot of things. Boundary work (the institution grounds all scholarship), appreciation (collegial quality control=more rigorous work), and many dark sides (ie it's unreliable, unfair, unpaid, unequal, and done by #reviewer2) 1/19
Let me start here-I've internalized the boundary work. I believe in peer review, for all its imperfections. I think it is among things setting science apart. I've also spend lots of time on it, including dealing with 600+ manuscripts as journal editor, based on ~1000 reviews 2/19
But while important, peer review is not the ONLY thing that define science. Many different norms and institutions together define us. As Ziman writes: “peculiarity of science is that knowledge as such is deemed to be its principle product and purpose” cambridge.org/core/books/rea… 3/19
US Congress yesterday hosted hearing on disinformation & extremism in the media
Journalists should want to interrogate these issue
As @farai writes as"we are questioning all the systems of society, journalism cannot be too prideful to examine itself" faraic.medium.com/its-bigger-tha… 1/5
One place to start is this (scathing) article: "What is being called our post-truth era [illustrates] the racial amnesia that plagues much of our contemporary post-truth criticism" in light of how e.g. media and politics often represent many minorities doi.org/10.1080/147914… 2/5
And this observation by some top-notch social scientists (which to my knowledge has largely been ignored by news coverage?)"Our analysis suggest that mainstream news media in fact play a significant and important role in the dissemination of fake news" doi.org/10.1080/238089… 3/5
Talked democratic creative destruction, filter bubbles, polarization, business of news, and media policy with @EvelynDouek and @QJurecic on the great @lawfareblog podcast - some links to underlying @risj_oxford in thread below
Here @dragz and I on “democratic creative destruction” challenging incumbent institutions, creates new ones, and in many ways empower individuals while also leaving both individuals & institutions increasingly dependent on large US-based tech companies cambridge.org/core/books/soc… 2/6
On filter bubbles, this is something @dragz and I have examined e.g.
Group discussion w/ @risj_oxford journalist fellows on which discussions are contentious in their newsrooms around 🌍, kicking off from some US journalists feeling dominant viewpoint limits their ability to speak up
Partial list (deep breath) of issues people identify as hard...
..including things that are hard to cover & write about such as
* Religion, esp dominant religious group or historically maligned religious groups
* Migration and refugees, esp in face of majoritarian backlash
* National security, esp in countries where military is very powerful
* Women's rights, esp in very patriarchal societies (and often patriarchal newsrooms)
* Sexuality, esp LGBT
* Tribalism, esp when interconnected with electoral politics and/or political violence
* Civil war (well yes that and the legacy it leaves is hard)
* Regionalism/separatism
There is (a) no conceptual clarity and (b) no substantial agreement on what exactly constitutes disinfo. This is not a philosophical point but defining feature of problems we face. It underlines inherently political nature of determining what does and does not constitute disinfo.
From the point of view of the public disinformation is to a large extent a problem associated with the behaviour of politicians and other domestic actors, especially on social media, and not more narrowly a problem of false information or actors with more unambiguously ill intent
First, 71% in Australia say they've used FB in the past week, 39% say they've engaged with news on FB digitalnewsreport.org
1/9
The 39% who have engaged with news on FB tend to be younger, women, more on the political left
Most access online news in many ways (direct,search,social,etc), but @dragz have run the numbers, and in 2020, 8% of 🇦🇺 internet news users say they ONLY get online news via social 2/9
That's maybe a million+ people? They can go elsewhere for news, but some won't. That's a big blow right there. As
we've shown, the effect of incidental exposure on e.g. Facebook is stronger for younger people and those with low interest in news. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14… 3/9