It's time to clarify some things about children, schools and #COVID19 🧵

Summary: Young children seem significantly less susceptible, probably less likely to transmit. Less clear for teens. Schools mainly follow community trends, but secondary much higher risk than primary

1
The best way to determine susceptibility is through household contact tracing, as it controls for *exposure* - everyone gets more or less the same

There are many of these. Results vary, which we expect because infection is complicated

That's why we need to combine results

2
Here's 4 meta analyses; all find young children are much less susceptible than adults. Some that teens are too

Zhu (RR 0.6)
academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar…

Goldstein (RR~0.5)
dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis…

Viner (OR 0.41)
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…

Maidwell (RR ~0.5)
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

3
What if cases in children were missed because they were asymptomatic?

Here are just a few which test ALL household contacts regardless of symptom, and all find lower susceptibility in children

Zhang
science.sciencemag.org/content/368/64…

Jing
thelancet.com/journals/lanin…

4
What if we're missing cases by PCR testing because it's difficult to NP swabs in children (even though nasal swabs are ~90% as sensitive)?

We have studies using serology. One found similar rates in children and adults

academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar…

But there are more studies...

6
All the following tested everyone with serology, and STILL found lower rates in young children

van Der Hoek
ntvg.nl/artikelen/de-r…

Lewis
academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar…

Bi
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

7
On to infectiousness; this is difficult to study for 2 reasons

1) We mainly examine infectiousness of symptomatic children, who are likely more infectious. If ~50% of children are asymptomatic, this is not representative
2) Shared exposure bias - this is worth exploring...

8
This is when 2 people became infected at the same time, but you mistakenly think one of them infected the other

It's a huge issue for children (who rarely travel alone). It completely reversed the findings of a study from South Korea when accounted for

9
The "biggest ever" contact tracing study from Southern India did not account for this bias

That means we can draw very little from the findings of infectiousness in children; did they infect each other, or all get infected at once?

10
Note: because of overdispersion, if you find multiple close contacts infected it may even be MORE likely they all became infected at once than infected each other, because they were likely infected by a super spreader

What else do we know about infectiousness?

11
The gold standard in contact tracing is using genomics, which can rule out transmission links if viral genomes are different

Iceland have done this well, and found young children to be significantly less susceptible AND infectious than adults

nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/1…

12
What about schools?

Prior evidence has shown in low community prevalence, schools are safe

Also that when community prevalence is high, secondary school is much higher risk for transmission

This has not changed

But are schools driving infection in the second wave?

13
When we say "driving" infection, we usually mean the group with the highest prevalence, or that accelerates transmission first, driving up rates for the others

This is the case for young children and schools for other respiratory viruses, but has not been for COVID-19

14
All across Europe, *young adults* have clearly driven the second wave of infection, which started before schools even opened

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

Teens have followed up behind, and slightly older adults after that

But then we've done something strange...

15
Many places have then closed down almost all other areas of society for mixing *Except schools*

If you stop mixing everywhere else, then you will get a disproportionate number of cases in schools, as in England; note this is mainly SECONDARY schools

16
Despite substantially higher rates of contacts and mixing than adults, young children have had infection rates the same or even lower than older adults throughout the second wave via *UNBIASED random population testing*

This is convincing evidence of reduced susceptibility

17
What about modelling studies showing school closure is effective?

We would expect it to reduce infection rates, because it would prevent 10million people in the UK from mixing; but how much is unclear

There are many biases difficult to account for

18
e.g. simultaneous implementation of NPIs, and as school closures happen earlier than other NPIs it exaggerates their effect

Some modelling studies have even shown school opened reduced transmission rates

cream-migration.org/publ_uploads/C…

Take all these studies with a handful of salt

19
Further evidence that schools aren't "driving" transmission, is that many countries in Europe have brought cases down whilst keeping schools open

Schools certainly contribute to transmission, but do not drive it

ft.com/content/7e1ad5…

20
What does this all mean?

-Schools mainly reflect community transmission
-If you close everything except schools, you'll obviously see a disproportionate number of cases in schools
-Secondary schools are much higher risk than primary schools

What should we do about this?

21
We must recognise the important of in person schooling; prolonged closures will deny children future life chances that cannot be reversed

They should be last to close, first to open

How can we facilitate this?

22
We must do several things:

-Keep community transmission low to keep cases out of schools
-Provide resources to enable safe behaviour, especially for young adults
-Improve school infection mitigation, especially in secondary (ventilation, masks, testing etc)

END
23
BONUS TWEET

For an overview of all the evidence regarding children and COVID-19, we have been reviewing it all since the beginning here on @DFTBubbles

dontforgetthebubbles.com/evidence-summa…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alasdair Munro

Alasdair Munro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @apsmunro

27 Nov
Really interesting pre print looking at school transmission in Northern Italy during the second surge

Suggests huge age dependant differences in risk of transmission in children in these settings (who would have guessed?!)

Let's take a look...

doi.org/10.1101/2020.1…

1/8
Detailed contact tracing of 43 cases
- 5 teachers
- 38 children

Whole classes tested regardless of symptoms, and swabbed a second time 10-14d later if the first was within 6 days of exposure

How much onward transmission?

2/8
Pre school (6 kids, 2 teachers) - 0/156 (0%)
Primary school (14 kids) - 1/266 (0.44%)
Secondary school (23 kids, 5 teachers) - 38/572 (6.64%)

Notice a pattern here?

3/8
Read 8 tweets
26 Nov
Some people are *still* lumping "children" all together in talking about transmission, schools etc

That is a dumb thing to do

It doesn't take a paediatrician to tell you a 2yr old is different from a 17yr old

Case study using data from the @ONS

ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…

1/8
The @ONS performs large scale, *random* population testing via rt-PCR

People often complain test data in children is biased by lower symptom burden - that is not the case for this data

Hence, it is very informative (why aren't more countries doing this?!)

2/8
Here is a graph of the last few weeks modelled incidence by age group

Huge initial spike in 17 - 24yr olds
Up behind then followed 12 - 16yr olds
Then 25 - 34yr olds
Then 35 - 49yr olds
Then 50 - 69yr olds

Eventually the 2 - 11yr olds get dragged up behind

3/8
Read 8 tweets
23 Nov
IT WORKS 🥳🎉

Great news from the Oxford/AZ vaccine phase III interim analysis today!

ovg.ox.ac.uk/news/oxford-un…

But if you thought you had questions after previous vaccine announcements, boy oh boy does this leave us wanting more!

Quick thread...

1/6
What are the interim results?

-131 cases in Brazil and the UK
-Overall efficacy 70% for the Oxford vaccine compare to control (MenACYW vaccine)
-No safety concerns identified

BUT

Split by dosing regime:
-2x high dose 62% effective
-Low dose then high dose 90% effective

2/6
That is a truly intriguing finding, and we'll need to see the breakdown of the data to understand the uncertainty around those estimates

I'll leave it for clever immunologists to theorise why a lower dose priming shot might be more effective

But wait, there's more...

3/6
Read 6 tweets
13 Nov
An absolute smorgasbord of data around children, schools and #COVID19 this week

We've got @PHE_uk , the @ONS survey, REACT study, and a new SAGE report!

Lets take a birds eye view of the key findings 🧵

1/17
First in @PHE_uk

Cases flattening in secondary age children after a sharp rise, rates still much lower in primary age

School outbreaks flat/declining (half term will have played a role here)

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

2/17
Of course these tests are symptom based, and may miss cases due to lower symptom burden in children

Let's look at the UK's 2 big, random sample studies which overcome this issue!

3/17
Read 17 tweets
10 Nov
This is a phenomenal statement from @ADPHUK

One disheartening thing about some of the scientific communications during the pandemic has been a painfully narrow view

None of that here

A holistic, considered and progressive approach to management of the pandemic

1/5
First, focus on a combination strategy

Stop focussing on silver bullets or game changers and start getting the basics right. Promote good public health messages. Support test/trace/isolate.

Complex problems don't have simple one stop solutions

2/5
Second, win HEARTS and MINDS

Foster trust, goodwill and collaboration (hint; this is NOT achieved by punishment, shaming and fearmongering, no matter how many ❤️🔁 it gets)

**Protect communities**

Amazing document outlining these strategies here

adph.org.uk/wp-content/upl…

3/5
Read 5 tweets
9 Nov
This potentially incredibly good news

Twitter is about to be full of articles about "herd immunity" again, but now with words laced in honey rather than shouting and hissing

Some things we now need to consider...

1/6

statnews.com/2020/11/09/cov…
We need to see the data

I note it is a difference between arms of *symptomatic* infection - this might mean reduction in disease severity, but we need to know about transmission

Why is that important?

2/6
With only ~90 events there's no way we'll be able to see efficacy in the highest risk groups who we are trying to protect (and who we're most worried won't mount an effective immune response)

Nice to turn COVID into a cold for younger people, but not what we're aiming for

3/6
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!