When one considers the full text of the 14th amendment, it is MASSIVELY scoped - covers fed to state, civil or military . . .
From Giuliani to McEnany to faithless electors and anyone involved in this coup attempt would appear to be disqualified to serve in govt.
1 of 2
As far as I can see it would be effective immediately, and all would qualify for prosecution under 18 U.S. Code § 2384.Seditious conspiracy, a law that has been used as recently as 2010.
@HouseDemocrats & #DOJ are compelled to enforce 14A or Congress vote to allow them.
2 of 2
PS The reason I put this to House Dems rather than the Senate is because it requires a majority vote to 'forgive' these seditionists and most of our Senate majority is complicit (self pardons - no).
PS2 Further interpretation of section 3 of the 14th amendment, from History(dot)com, AFFIRMS that those who engaged in insurrection could not hold office w/out the approval of 2/3rds of each chamber of Congress.
Cont...
Meaning insurrection/sedition is a complete disqualifier of viability for service, with no provision for those currently serving (that I can find).
The only way to bypass that would be for Congress to vote insurrectionists essentially a non criminal pardon.
PS3 From Congress(dot)gov, regarding the disqualification clause (what I earlier called a 'pardon') -- was removed, w/exceptions, in 1872, then twenty-six years later in its entirety (" . . . incurred heretofore, is hereby removed.")
Cont...
Note that this section deals with only disqualifications, or the process of allowing voting insurrectionists a pass to allow them to serve.
I could find no notes regarding the primary body itself and therefore presume it to be as written.
So. Now we have this problem of 126 GOP who were so brazen in their attempt to overthrow our government that everyone who's not on the red pill (the majority of us) that it's intolerable to think of them being involved in govt at all.
Technically any of them with license to practice law should be disbarred.
That they probably won't be completely throttles trust in the bar. What kind of law do they respect or regulate if the betrayal of the very system of govt under which they practice is tolerable?
They should be prosecuted for, at minimum, seditious conspiracy and probably several other charges (election fraud, conspiracy to overthrow the US Govt etc).
The fact that they probably won't be means they will forever be a threat to our Constitution - even if unseated.
Characterizing Trump as "desperate", because it is so often qualified as "failing" or "struggling against the odds" is another way we underestimate him. There is little, if anything, to stop his theft of this election.
People cite his treatment of his own supporters as him 'taking everything out with him' when he's taken out of office. In fact he treats them that way because he's confident he's got his theft in the pocket and he's never cared about them.
This conclusion that he will not be held stopped can be easily extrapolated from the fact that it is only law that enforces elections and he has a crime list a mile long, including against children and babies, and nobody is stopping any of that.