”Californians say they want big, progressive changes. But when it comes to their neighborhoods, or anything that might even marginally slow the stratospheric ascent of their property values, many balk. And too many legislators cower at their discontent.” latimes.com/opinion/story/…
”LA’s land use policy is, generally, a disaster. Strict zoning regulations (born largely out of overt racism) prohibit building anything other than single-family homes in most of the city, making it nearly impossible to add enough affordable housing.” latimes.com/opinion/story/…
“NIMBYism is always going to be a problem. But LA has gotten grim. We’re dealing with homelessness, racial injustice and simultaneously fighting a climate crisis. The status quo just doesn’t have the same appeal it used to.” latimes.com/opinion/story/…
”Single-family mandates were appealing because they maintained racial segregation without racial language.” Amid a push for fair housing laws in California, ”LA’s zoning capacity was sharply reduced between 1960 and 1980.” lewis.ucla.edu/housing/housin…
For more on the hypocrisy of liberal (inclusion! equality!) and conservative (freedom! markets!) NIMBYism, see this thread:
Sources: (2) From @robertisnthere:
“Across Wisconsin, Georgia & Arizona, Biden defeated Trump by 42,918 votes, a narrower margin than Trump defeated Clinton by four years ago with 77,744 votes across WI, MI & PA…” statehood.substack.com/p/2020-was-amo…
— Designed to increase power of slaveholding states via 3/5ths clause
— Winner take all rules created, in part, to deny equal voice to Black voters
— In 1970, popular reform blocked by filibuster led by segregationist Senators
“Under 3/5s compromise, 5 slaves were equal to 3 free people in order to increase the South’s representation in Congress. Thus, in electing the president, the political power southerners gained from owning slaves would be factored into electoral votes…” people.uncw.edu/lowery/pls101/…
“Thanks to 3/5ths clause, slave states got extra votes in House, just as in Electoral College.
…
As a result, every president until Lincoln was either a Southerner or a Northerner who was willing (while president) to accommodate the slaveholding South.” nytimes.com/2019/04/06/opi…
If folks want to drive in same direction as other traffic on public roads, they are free to do so. Those who don’t want to drive in the same direction as traffic on the right side of the road shouldn’t be shamed into it, and govt should not mandate it.
Using variation in timing across different regions of Ontario, economists found mask mandates increased “self-reported mask-wearing by 30 percentage points”and “may have reduced new weekly Covid cases by as much as 25%.” nationalpost.com/news/canada/ma…
Study finds “if the U.S. had introduced a uniform national mask mandate for employees of public-facing businesses on April 1, the number of deaths in the U.S. would likely have been 40 percent lower on June 1.” news.mit.edu/2020/masks-man…
“Thanks to 3/5ths clause, slave states got extra votes in House, just as in Electoral College.
…
As a result, every president until Lincoln was either a Southerner or a Northerner who was willing (while president) to accommodate the slaveholding South.” nytimes.com/2019/04/06/opi…
“Under 3/5s compromise, 5 slaves were equal to 3 free people in order to increase the South’s representation in Congress. Thus, in electing the president, the political power southerners gained from owning slaves would be factored into electoral votes…” people.uncw.edu/lowery/pls101/…
Even low-probability events, given enough trials, are likely to occur. Put another way, Trump has been playing Russian roulette with Covid using a “revolver” that had one bullet and thousands of chambers. 1/
Any individual encounter with another person was like a spin of the cylinder and a pull of the trigger that was exceedingly unlikely to result in a bad outcome. 2/
In recent weeks, though, amid reports of uneven testing and visibly crowded gatherings, the White House appears to have become even more lax about Covid. 3/
New cross-national study finds “nonviolent tactics strongly increase movement support relative to violent tactics & preference for nonviolent resistance is primarily driven by intrinsic commitments to the moral superiority of nonviolence.” 🧵 researchgate.net/profile/Jonath…
5000 survey participants in 33 countries were presented with “a fictional vignette described as a recent news article about a public demonstration against an autocratic regime.” The vignette randomly varied protester tactics, repression by regime & movement success. 2/
Subjects were then asked would you support the movement? Do you imagine a citizen of that country would support the movement? Do you imagine citizens would join the protests? Would you donate? 3/