Tweet

Seth Abramson

14 Dec, 12 tweets, 4 min read

UPDATE: I said that Dallas' "Allied Security Operations Group"—behind the disinformation-fueled attack on Michigan's certification for Biden—would be traced to Flynn.

Well, one of the men who headed it until days ago "served as an intelligence operations leader under DIA Flynn."

PS: So Trump *pardoned* Michael Flynn *in the midst of* a longtime Flynn associate being part of the management of an entity working to undermine Biden's win in Michigan—and found by Michigan officials to have lied about elections data. Cybersecurity-scam-for-pardon bribery case?

PS2: What I'm not sure of yet is whether any Michael Flynn associates/Donald Trump mega-donors in Dallas—where Allied Security Operations Group is headquartered—were paying ASOG to conduct this "research" or urged Kraft's name to be removed from ASOG to hide the linkage to Flynn.

PS3: Given Erik Prince's connections to the Michigan Republican Party and to Flynn—and for that matter, Prince's connections to Trump and to dodgy cybersecurity outfits—I continue to believe a federal investigation of this possible bribery plot could uncover Prince's involvement.

PS4: Don't sleep on this, media. There's evidence of the Texas lawsuit being a bribery plot Trump can't pardon himself for—because the pardon is part of the plot—even if he could self-pardon (he can't). And this Michigan lawsuit may be a bribery case Flynn's pardon doesn't cover.

PS5: Donald Trump is *right now* tweeting about the Michigan lawsuit that it appears Flynn was connected to *while he was seeking a pardon from Trump* through his attorney (then also Trump's attorney) Sidney Powell.

So Did Flynn and Trump use Powell as a "privileged" go-between?

PS6: And what is Michael Flynn tweeting about obsessively at the very moment Donald Trump—his possible co-conspirator in a federal bribery case—is tweeting about the Flynn-connected "Allied Security Operations Group" case in Michigan? You guessed it: the very same Trumpist fraud.

PS7: And as Trump and Flynn are tweeting about this fraudulent lawsuit that increasingly looks like a cybersecurity-scam-for-pardon bribery case coordinated by their mutual lawyer Sidney Powell, what is Powell tweeting about—including tweeting about it *to* Flynn? That very case.

PS8: Why this case matters: Trump, Flynn, Powell and others have said they'll fight on through January 20—even if Biden's electors are accepted by Congress on January 6 (they will be). They'll use this case as a cause célèbre—saying it's evidence that came out post-certification.

PS9: The other ASOG head, Russ Ramsland, was going to primary Trump donor/Flynn-Prince associate Pete Sessions in what everyone knew would be a tight primary—it went to runoff—but suddenly chose not to.

He later got paid a lot, it seems, to do dodgy cybersecurity work for Trump.

PS10: Ramsland is a big deal in the Dallas Tea Party—had he run (and his early materials were all attacks on Trump donor Sessions) he may have kept Sessions out of the run-off—so it really makes you wonder what and who convinced him not to run... and be useful to Trump later on.

UPSHOT: Trump, Flynn, Prince and others are desperate. Trump wants to avoid prosecution. The others want pardons. We're going to find that bribery and sedition were the order of the day in Trump's final weeks—*if* Biden's DOJ investigates. Trump is banking on getting a free pass.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @SethAbramson

Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson

16 Dec

QAnon is an ARG (Alternate Reality Game). It was set up that way and is managed that way. QAnoners are playing an ARG and refuse to stop for the very reason transreality gaming can be hazardous: you can forget what's game and what's reality. QAnoners are lost in a dangerous game.

The reason this matters is that Trump and his agents aim to expand the gamification of reality beyond the confines of QAnon's ARG mythology. Now they're turning the finding of evidence of "election fraud" into a transreality game with its own mythology. All of this is dangerous.

When we think of the far right as a space of "fake news" rather than the gamification of reality, we falsely accept the notion that Trumpists are interested in news. They're not. They're interested in tailored escapism, and in redefining reality as a mythology they can live with.

Read 15 tweets

Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson

15 Dec

Dr. Fauci's timeline has 100 million getting vaccinated in the first 108 days (925,000/day), then 130 million getting vaccinated in the next 91 days (1.4 million/day). No one can explain how—as we get into the population hostile to vaccination—we'll be vaccinating 50% more daily.

(PS) We were previously told that vaccine shortages may appear in May/June because Trump didn't order enough vaccine. Now we're told May and June will see *50% more daily vaccinations* than the first 108 days. Sadly, no one is out front explaining such discrepancies to Americans.

(PS2) I hope the vaccine timeline goes as planned, and that 70% is in fact enough for herd immunity. But avid news-watchers are starting to see discrepancies in the rhetoric surrounding the timeline that no one is explaining, producing concern we're being sold a too-rosy picture.

Read 8 tweets

Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson

14 Dec

235 million must be vaccinated for us to have a shot at herd immunity. Biden says we can vaccinate 1 million daily. The vaccine takes 30 days to have full effect. Herd immunity is therefore impossible until 8+ months from now.

What is Fauci talking about? nbcnews.com/news/us-news/f…

(PS) My last tweet laid out *none* of the obstacles that would make even that 8+ month timeline impossible—like vaccine shortages, people not returning for the second shot, resistance to getting vaccinated, logistical hurdles at the state level. Again—what is Fauci talking about?

(UPDATE) Reuters and the government confirm that at *best* we can vaccinate 1 million/day. Reuters reports that 109 days from now, we'll have 100 million people vaccinated. The idea we can have 235+ million vaccinated in well under 200 days makes no sense. google.com/amp/s/www.usne…

Read 4 tweets

Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson

14 Dec

BREAKING: Trump Agent Stephen Miller Says Fraudulent Trump Electors Will Continue to Claim Trump Is the Rightful President Through *At Least January 20*—2 Weeks *After* Congress Votes to Accept Biden's Legally Valid Battleground-State Electors on January 6 thedailybeast.com/brian-kilmeade…

You may recall that I expressed significant alarm over former CNN analyst and current Trump campaign official Steve Cortes claiming in a Twitter-posted video that the Trump campaign considers *January 20, 2021* the only significant date with respect to electors.

Now we know why.

The reason this is significant is that it means the Trump campaign does not consider the decision of Congress on January 6, 2021 to be the final word on who will be the next President of the United States—even though by *statute and Constitution* it is. This is a seditious claim.

Read 4 tweets

Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson

14 Dec

18 USC § 2385 criminalizes "organizing any assembly of persons who advocate the overthrow of the government by force"—and distinguishes "force" from "violence."

The White House has organized fraudulent electors to block the democratically elected government from taking office.

(PS) I can't ascertain the scope of the word "force" in this statute (except that we can be statutorily sure it does *not* mean "violence") but creating a scenario—contra a Supreme Court ruling—in which there could be a hostile standoff at the White House on Jan. 20 may well fit.

(PS2) As a lawyer I'd tend to interpret "force" as meaning "unlawful compulsion short of violence" when it appears in a statute that deals with violence as a separate category. An unlawful attempt to retain the White House contra SCOTUS would be "force" under this interpretation.

Read 22 tweets

Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson

13 Dec

COVID-19 reporting is getting looser, shoddier, and more confusing.

Example: actual number of Americans who will be vaccinated for COVID-19 in 2020: 0.

Vaccination isn't complete until you receive a second injection 21 days after the first, which no one will prior to next year.

Excitement over the vaccine produces misleading reports.

Example: Fauci says "open season" for the vaccine will begin in April—implying that anyone who wants it will be able to get it then.

In fact there's no plan to vaccinate more than a million people—0.3% of Americans—daily.

There's a hyperbolic optimism to much vaccine rhetoric I find unnerving.

Example: Biden has an ambitious plan to vaccinate 100 million people by April 20—which means full efficacy for those vaccinations by May 20. Good! But that's only 30% of America. Herd immunity requires 70%.

Read 16 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!