Share this page!

Teri Kanefield Profile picture
Twitter logo
14 Dec, 9 tweets, 3 min read
This is equal parts horrifying and absurd. These are not real electors. There is not a "competing" slate of electors.

It's the Nevada GOP showing that they are completely unhinged from reality.
You see, Nevada certified its election for Biden on 11/24.
forbes.com/sites/alisondu…
Nevada law requires that the electors are legally bound to vote for whoever wins the presidential election in NV. apnews.com/article/electi…
Dear Nevada GOP:

It's time for Election Law 101.

Because of a complicated system we have called the electoral college, when you vote for president, you don't actually vote for president, you vote for a slate of electors.

The GOP electors lost when Trump lost the election.
Your "electors" weren't able to cast a ballot for anyone today because they lost the election.

This ⤵️is like me saying "I'm the governor of California and I will sign some official orders."

I can say I'm governor, but I'm not, and my "official orders' are meaningless.

See?
Sort of, but a little more complicated. Back in the days before the Internet and phones, one part of the state might not know what the other part was doing (or the different branches might not agree) . . .
So it was possible for the legislature to certify one set of electors and the governor (the executive branch certifies elections) to certify another.

The Electoral Count Act says if dueling slates of electors arrive, the Governor of the state settles the dispute.
But this ⤵️wasn't authorized by the legislature. It was removed from legal procedure.

It's so weird I don't know what to make of it.

Someone told me once: "I'm not a citizen of the United States. I'm a citizen of the Republic of California." Then he added . . .
"There are a lot of us." I backed away. Then I ran. After that, if I saw him I walked the other way.

It's like that. They're living in an alternate reality.
I put this thread on my blog, here: terikanefield-blog.com/no-nevada-elec…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture
15 Dec
The Georgia GOP civil war intensifies.

Trump retweeted Lin Wood, who informed @BrianKempGA and @GaSecofState that Trump will throw them in jail.

Wood is the guy who told GA Republicans to boycott the Senate runoffs.

(Both Kemp and Raffensperger say they voted for Trump) Image
Trump can't throw them in jail, but he can endanger their lives.

So much is stunning.
🔹It's now GOP officials who supported Trump, who are being targeted.
🔹Trump is targeting Georgia GOP, where early voting has started in the runoff election.
The firing of Barr is supposed to make you think that in the few weeks remaining, Trump can weaponize the DOJ to jail Kemp and Raffensperger. He can't: there are procedures for arrests and indictments, including judicial oversight.
Read 5 tweets
Teri Kanefield Profile picture
14 Dec
Here it is. What is surely the last gasp of the strategy to accomplish a judicial coup d'état.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court decision.

Who is surprised? Nobody.

But it's still fun.

wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/Dis………

Reading it now . . .

1/
Petitioners sought to "invalidate the ballots" of more than 220,000 Wisconsin voters in Dane and Milwaukee Counties.

As with the other complaints, the issue wasn't that any voters did anything wrong; it's how the election was conducted.

1/
The doctrine of laches as applied to elections in a nutshell: You can't agree to the rules, wait to see how the election turns out, and then challenge the rules.

That's why lawyers kept saying the courts won't allow it, even if the judges are Republicans.

2/
Read 9 tweets
Teri Kanefield Profile picture
14 Dec
Reading recommendation: Rand Corp, "The Russian Firehose of Falsehoods Propaganda Model," includes advice on how to counter a rapid and continuous stream of lies.
rand.org/pubs/perspecti…

1/
The liar has a “shameless willingness” to tell outrageous lies that lots of people know are lies.

The liar doesn’t care about consistency.
He doesn’t care if it’s obvious he’s lying.
rand.org/pubs/perspecti…
In fact, that's the whole point.

Putin perfected the method.

2/
It seems to come naturally to Trump.

@TimothyDSnyder tells how reporters were often so astonished by Putin's outrageous lies, that they focused on the lies instead of Putin's latest atrocities.

The lies became the news.
The actual news gets pushed off the stage.

3/
Read 15 tweets
Teri Kanefield Profile picture
13 Dec
What is Happening In America in 4 Tweets

#1:Trump invents whatever suits his fancy.

#2: People around Trump tell him he is right: He is entitled to the presidency as was robbed of what he deserves.

Read 6 tweets
Teri Kanefield Profile picture
12 Dec
I'll lay the entire process out here, and show why this can't happen. Applicable law: The Electoral Count Act and of course, your favorite document and mine, the Constitution, or, if you prefer cliff notes: crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF…

Here's what happens on Jan. 6.

1/
The Houses meet to count the votes.

Both Houses are required by law to declare the winner of the election.

But (and here's the rub) members may object to particular electors.

2/
This creates some theater. Trump loyalists can object.

What then? If both a Senator and member of the House object to a particular elector, there is a recess. The Houses meet separately for a maximum of 2 hours.

They vote. If both Houses agree, the delegates are tossed.

3/
Read 21 tweets
Teri Kanefield Profile picture
12 Dec
In Trump World, it makes sense to spend months and millions of dollars trying to overturn an election while ignoring a virus that killed over 300,000 Americans.

For Trump and pals, the purpose of government isn’t to help people. It’s to protect the power of those at the top.
A lot of people do not believe that the purpose of government is to help people. They call that socialism.

For them, government maintains the hierarchy.

That's why they think mandating masks is tyranny, but tax cuts for corporations is good government.
That's because you're a person who believes fairness and equality are possible.
Some people don't believe that. They think some people belong at the top, and that if nature takes its course, the "makers" end up a the top and the "takers' at the bottom. . .
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @Teri_Kanefield has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @Teri_Kanefield!

Read all threads by @Teri_Kanefield