1/Anything we don't find in nature came directly out of the minds of men and women.
One of the reasons I am a pragmatic optimist is because of the endless human ingenuity that created almost everything we use on a daily basis.
2/ Have you ever just looked at a smartphone and and marveled at the ingenuity and collective human intelligence that created it? We humans are an adaptable lot, but occasionally look and wonder how you could ever explain a smartphone to someone from 1900. Yes, there are problems
3/ and always will be--but given how far we have come so relatively quickly, I believe that the directional arrow of human progress points upward.
Here's a quote from Robert Pirsig's "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" that nicely makes a similar point:
4/ "Steel has no more shape than this old pile of dirt on the engine here. These shapes are all out of someone’s mind. That’s important to see. The steel? Hell, even the steel is out of someone’s mind. There’s no steel in nature. Anyone from the
5/ Bronze Age could have told you that. All nature has is a potential for steel. There’s nothing else there. But what’s “potential”? That’s also in someone’s mind!"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“There must be some kind of way outta here
Said the joker to the thief
There's too much confusion
I can't get no relief"
~Bob Dylan
Congratulations! If you've stuck with me this far, you might actually be interested in changing things.
2/ The problem is, you've also entered what Wilson calls "Chapel Perilous"--a place filled with both our fears but also with some of the answers to the questions many would rather not ask. The point is simple: Many of us believe things that we’ve never questioned or considered
3/ questioning. And, like a computer operating system that is badly programmed, our Provers might be proving the *wrong* things, and that keeps leading us to suboptimal choices and results.
So, how do we rectify this situation? Wilson himself offered a pretty limited solution:
1/ "The wrong software guarantees wrong answers, or total gibberish. Conversely, the correct software, if you find it, will often "miraculously" solve problems that had appeared intractable.”
~Robert Anton Wilson
“The lunatic is in my head
You raise the blade, you make the change
You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me”
~Pink Floyd
2/ We’re now going to look at what we’re up against—hint, it’s a lot and sometimes freezes our efforts to change—first, from outside influences and then from our own minds. I’ll also make some suggestions along the way for how you can reignite your
3/ Thinker and change your perceptions. There’s no magic to it, only our willingness to take on the difficult task of evaluating and challenging our own beliefs.
So many misunderstandings and tragedies result from our (and by “our” I mean all humans) inability to properly do an
1/ Reading "The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous" by Joseph Henrich
The first thing that strikes me is the idea that in addition to many psychological studies having serious replication problems
2/ the author found that even well designed studies have: "Massively biased samples: Most of what was known experimentally about human psychology and behavior was based on studies with undergraduates from Western societies.
3/ At the time, 96 percent of experimental participants were drawn from northern Europe, North America, or Australia, and about 70 percent of these were American undergraduates."
This leads to biases the author and his research associates dub
We left off with how the ability to challenge consensus reality could be a horrible or great thing, depending upon where society finds itself at the time. Generally, the more open and free a society,
2/ the greater the impact of people who challenge the conventional wisdom. One of the reasons why my Prover always finds free markets superior to other systems is because they have provided the lion’s share of new things and ideas. This wasn’t always so,
3/ and for certain regions ruled by Fundamentalist political or religious beliefs, *still* isn’t so.
When we study history, we see that before the connected computer age, consensus reality changed very slowly and often was extremely hostile to anyone who injected new ideas
1/ "Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habits; thought is anarchic and lawless, indifferent to authority, careless of the well-tried wisdom of the ages."
~Bertrand Russell
2/ Everyone who thinks must face the scary question of: Why?
Why are we here, there *must* be some grand scheme, some huge meaning to life.
So asked Buddha, Marcus Aurelius, Lao Tzu, Jesus Christ, William Shakespeare, Walt Whitman, et al. "What is the grand purpose?"
3/ There must be complex answers for this complex question!
Whole industries, academies, universities, philosophies, religions are there with the right answer, right?
Um, probably not.
Life and these institutions and philosophies have great, almost infinite pre-packaged