“There must be some kind of way outta here
Said the joker to the thief
There's too much confusion
I can't get no relief"
~Bob Dylan
Congratulations! If you've stuck with me this far, you might actually be interested in changing things.
2/ The problem is, you've also entered what Wilson calls "Chapel Perilous"--a place filled with both our fears but also with some of the answers to the questions many would rather not ask. The point is simple: Many of us believe things that we’ve never questioned or considered
3/ questioning. And, like a computer operating system that is badly programmed, our Provers might be proving the *wrong* things, and that keeps leading us to suboptimal choices and results.
So, how do we rectify this situation? Wilson himself offered a pretty limited solution:
4/ His first bit of advice is the same as mine--first, start trying to see the Thinker/Prover app working in other people. We're much better at seeing these things clearly in other people than we are in ourselves. Here's Wilson:
“Avoid coming to any strong conclusions
5/ prematurely. Try to figure out what their Thinkers think, and how their Provers methodically set about proving it. Second, apply the same exercise to yourself.
Believe that you can exceed all your previous ambitions and hopes in all areas of your life.”
~Robert Anton Wilson
6/ The first bit is pretty easy. But go slowly and if you're trying to understand the process in a friend or family member, don't try to provoke anything, simply pay attention to how they process information that agrees with one of their beliefs and then innocently introduce
7/ something that you KNOW contradicts it. Make sure it's from a source that the person believes is generally credible and watch what happens. When you're doing this for the first time, it might actually surprise you to watch their Prover working in real time. It did me.
8/ Don't argue, just observe. Do this a couple times with different people and you will often be unable to unsee the process working in others, even if you try.
His 2nd piece of advice is much harder "try the process on yourself." Harder, because now we're working *against* our
9/ own Provers, and, um, your Prover will actively attempt to convince you this is a fool's errand.
So, I recommend an intermediate step--without giving it too much thought, think of something that you believe you rarely see. In my case, it was green cars. Write down what you
10/ *think* you rarely see, then write "tomorrow, I will actively look for [your rare item.]" Follow this with a prediction of how many you expect to see over that entire day. In my case, I predicted I would see at most 7-10 green cars. The number I actually saw? 47. It freaked
11/ me out a bit, but really made me understand the truth behind this ancient quote from the "Bhagavad Gita:"
“You are what you believe in. You become that which you believe you can become.”
This exercise demonstrates that we "see" a lot more of things when we actively focus
12/ in an innocent way--who cares how many green cars you see anyway?
But the exercise primes your mind for trying this Thinker/Prover thing on yourself. It makes you aware of just how vast/deep the information pool is and how your mind actively filters out the majority of
13/ it which helps you understand why your Prover works so well--like the exercise, your Prover is *actively* looking for information that confirms your Thinker's beliefs. Once you see this working with the exercise, you're ready to try this on yourself. But, start small.
14/ Think about minor beliefs you have that aren't foundational like an affinity or dislike for some sort of art, music or TV program. Then ask "Do I REALLY like/dislike this?"
The trick here is by asking this question, you are turning your Thinker back ON. As you think of it,
15/ your Prover will up its game and flood you with a host of "reasons" for why you DO indeed like/dislike the thing.
Let that pass and then start actively thinking--maybe I like this because all my friends do, or because I grew up with it, or it's something that you and your
16/ significant other discovered, but the thing is, you've moved it back into the Thinker's camp and by so doing you might honestly be astounded if you treat it like a mystery you're trying to solve and when looking up things (thank god for Google) you will notice pieces and
17/ articles that you will honestly believe you never saw before and there's some truth to that--your Prover, like the neuralyzer from "Men in Black," pretty much removed them from your attention or, if they got your attention, conveniently removed them from your memory.
18/ When your mind is reopened to ALL of the information on the topic you're thinking about, you may at first feel silly and still remain skeptical about the information that refutes your belief. This is totally normal the first few times you do this, but as you get in the habit
19/ of doing this, it will feel less and less forced and unusual. You might actually have fun with it. I once worked with a person whose first belief was that he hated peas. (he took my 'start small' advice pretty literally) and several days later, he called me and said
20/ "goddamnit O'Shaughnessy, I actually LIKE peas." By going through the process he realized that his dislike of peas came from his childhood where he was forced to eat them by his parents (same thing happened with my wife) and he realized by turning his Thinker back on that it
21/ was a super silly belief because it led him to always refuse peas when offered, so he hadn't actually eaten one since his childhood! He ordered them in a restaurant and was shocked to find that he actually liked them, a lot.
Silly? Yes, but this small "win" made him much
22/ more serious about the process and he went on to make some pretty significant upgrades to his "reality tunnel."
One thing to remember is to avoid thinking that you were in some way "fooling yourself." Nobody likes to feel like a fool and as Mark Twain is reputed to have
23/ said “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” If you become convinced that you were fooling yourself, your shields will go up and maybe even get you to stop taking another look at your "preferences" and beliefs because you unconsciously
24/ equate that with being fooled and almost nobody wants to admit they are easily fooled, either by themselves or others.
So, we've now got the basic starter package explained and on this level, I think most of you who try it will be amused and surprised at how this works.
25/ But let's be clear--in the next thread, I'll cover some ways you can change some of your more deeply held beliefs, and when we're facing those, things get a bit harder.
For now, I wish you a bountiful of those rare things you thought you didn't see: cause now you know did.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Anything we don't find in nature came directly out of the minds of men and women.
One of the reasons I am a pragmatic optimist is because of the endless human ingenuity that created almost everything we use on a daily basis.
2/ Have you ever just looked at a smartphone and and marveled at the ingenuity and collective human intelligence that created it? We humans are an adaptable lot, but occasionally look and wonder how you could ever explain a smartphone to someone from 1900. Yes, there are problems
3/ and always will be--but given how far we have come so relatively quickly, I believe that the directional arrow of human progress points upward.
Here's a quote from Robert Pirsig's "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" that nicely makes a similar point:
1/ "The wrong software guarantees wrong answers, or total gibberish. Conversely, the correct software, if you find it, will often "miraculously" solve problems that had appeared intractable.”
~Robert Anton Wilson
“The lunatic is in my head
You raise the blade, you make the change
You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me”
~Pink Floyd
2/ We’re now going to look at what we’re up against—hint, it’s a lot and sometimes freezes our efforts to change—first, from outside influences and then from our own minds. I’ll also make some suggestions along the way for how you can reignite your
3/ Thinker and change your perceptions. There’s no magic to it, only our willingness to take on the difficult task of evaluating and challenging our own beliefs.
So many misunderstandings and tragedies result from our (and by “our” I mean all humans) inability to properly do an
1/ Reading "The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous" by Joseph Henrich
The first thing that strikes me is the idea that in addition to many psychological studies having serious replication problems
2/ the author found that even well designed studies have: "Massively biased samples: Most of what was known experimentally about human psychology and behavior was based on studies with undergraduates from Western societies.
3/ At the time, 96 percent of experimental participants were drawn from northern Europe, North America, or Australia, and about 70 percent of these were American undergraduates."
This leads to biases the author and his research associates dub
We left off with how the ability to challenge consensus reality could be a horrible or great thing, depending upon where society finds itself at the time. Generally, the more open and free a society,
2/ the greater the impact of people who challenge the conventional wisdom. One of the reasons why my Prover always finds free markets superior to other systems is because they have provided the lion’s share of new things and ideas. This wasn’t always so,
3/ and for certain regions ruled by Fundamentalist political or religious beliefs, *still* isn’t so.
When we study history, we see that before the connected computer age, consensus reality changed very slowly and often was extremely hostile to anyone who injected new ideas
1/ "Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habits; thought is anarchic and lawless, indifferent to authority, careless of the well-tried wisdom of the ages."
~Bertrand Russell
2/ Everyone who thinks must face the scary question of: Why?
Why are we here, there *must* be some grand scheme, some huge meaning to life.
So asked Buddha, Marcus Aurelius, Lao Tzu, Jesus Christ, William Shakespeare, Walt Whitman, et al. "What is the grand purpose?"
3/ There must be complex answers for this complex question!
Whole industries, academies, universities, philosophies, religions are there with the right answer, right?
Um, probably not.
Life and these institutions and philosophies have great, almost infinite pre-packaged