The Home Office review on "grooming gangs" finally published concludes:

1. “links between ethnicity and this form of offending” could not be proven
2. “Research has found that group-based child sexual exploitation (CSE) offenders are most commonly white"
independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
“Some studies suggest an over-representation of black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending.”
The document said there were issues with the data used in existing studies, sample selection and a “potential for bias and inaccuracies”

Assume this is referring to studies like the Quilliam report that was widely debunked by experts at the time, yet was cited in national papers
The Home Office previously said releasing the paper would not be in the “public interest”, in response to a Freedom of Information request by The Independent

independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
It would be good to understand why this was not considered in the public interest before, given the interest on this issue had led to so many conspiracy theories about Pakistanis in particular

Full report here

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Those whose research was debunked at the time by experts such as Dr @DrEllaC, yet stood by its veracity (e.g. Quilliam), need to respond now.

The Quilliam report was cited by national newspapers as fact, and used by the far right

What are the consequences for those who inflamed the far right?

They should be held accountable for their failures in publishing poor research that had consequences
Let's hope this report can help this disgusting crime of gang-related child sexual exploitation (as well as all forms of CSE) be tackled effectively & that it is reported on properly.
Joseph Harker (@josephharker) realised the dangers of poor reporting on this early on.

We now need media outlets to reflect *again* on why many (not all) fed this narrative that has provided fuel to the far right, even though its basis was thin
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
To be explicit, the HO report dismisses the Quilliam report as an unreliable source - see pic and assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…

Ht @DrEllaC

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Miqdaad Versi

Miqdaad Versi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @miqdaad

15 Dec
On the day the "think tank" he is Director of Policy is at (Quilliam), has its report on gang-related CSE (used by the far right) so clearly debunked *again*, you'd have thought he might have some humility.

But instead there is silence.
ICYMI:

Quilliam: there is an over-representation of (South) Asian men in group-based child sexual exploitation crimes
quilliaminternational.com/press-release-…

Home Office: “it is not possible" to make that conclusion
Image
At the time, expert Dr @DrEllaC highlighted the "sheer intellectual dishonesty & irresponsibility of releasing this tripe badged as “evidence”"

Read 4 tweets
15 Dec
The blind spot Baldét and other pro-Prevent propagandists have, is they don't seem to have a clue why Palestinians might find it wholly offensive to be in such a presentation.

Why is "vocal support for Palestine" even relevant to be in such a presentation?
The context matters.

This is not out of the blue....there are many cases where being vocally pro-Palestinian has led to accusations of extremism

aljazeera.com/features/2015/… ImageImage
This case study is on Prevent For Schools where discussing Palestine was deemed relevant.

preventforschools.org/download/file/… Image
Read 9 tweets
15 Dec
After Julie Burchill's Islamophobia towards @AyoCaesar, she appears to have lost her book contract

It appears her publisher realised the risk to its reputation to be associated with her racism & that Burchill may cross the line again during book promotion
m.facebook.com/story.php?stor…
Some context on what Julie Burchill said to Ash Sarkar

Some context on broader issues of racism from Burchill

Read 4 tweets
14 Dec
It is important to realise that Julie Burchill has a documented history of hate of Muslims & Islam, which is well known, yet has no bearing on her being a columnist at The Telegraph.

Thread
Akin Ajayi in Haaretz, highlights how those who "makes the mistake of mentioning Muslims sympathetically in her presence" are her enemies.

haaretz.com/life/books/.pr…
Julie herself admits that she had a serious problem with her rabbi because she wanted to build bridges between Muslims and Jews.

telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-l…
Read 15 tweets
13 Dec
Telegraph columnist Julie Burchill should be ashamed of her repulsive tweet:

1. She got her facts wrong: Prophet Muhammad (SAW)'s first wife was a 40 yr old successful businesswoman

2. Why bring in the Prophet to a discussion about Liddle - only because Ash is a Muslim?
3. More importantly, why is she defending Liddle's disgusting article, where he “could not remotely conceive of not trying to shag the kids" (under-age and against the law -> would be considered rape)?
The reality is that columnists like Burchill make a conscious choice:

A) Attack Muslims like Ash
B) Defend people like Rod Liddle despite his long history of awful, racist & misogynist & hateful articles

Read 4 tweets
13 Dec
ICYMI: the Chinese embassy's claim is clearly not true for Uighur Muslims

1.China built 100s of internment camps in Xinjiang, detaining 100,000s of Uighur Muslims
2. Forced sterilisation cases uncovered in Xinjiang
3. 1000s of Xinjiang mosques destroyed or damaged (65% of total)
4. Merely practising Islam is considered suspicious behaviour

hrw.org/news/2020/12/0…
5. This is not new - in 2015, China banned Muslims from fasting in Ramadan
aljazeera.com/news/2015/6/18…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!