This data is difficult to interpret in a number of ways: 1. There is no denominator, either of institutions or populations 2. It counts the number of outbreaks, not cases 3. It doesn't tell you who had the infections
- 24,000 schools (9 million pupils) not inc. university
- 11,000 care homes (410,000 residents)
- 117 prisons (79,000 prisoners)
- 26,000 restaurants (many not/partially open)
We are comparing apples and oranges
Epidemiology 101
3/5
These numbers are more useful for comparing relative trends over time, where educations settings have actually remained remarkably stable
Rates have unsurprisingly fallen in other locations which were closed over lockdown
But there is more to consider
4/5
Rates are high in secondary schools at the moment, lagging behind adult cases numbers which fell during lockdown (in Hubei kids numbers lagged 19d behind adults)
It's time to clarify some things about children, schools and #COVID19 🧵
Summary: Young children seem significantly less susceptible, probably less likely to transmit. Less clear for teens. Schools mainly follow community trends, but secondary much higher risk than primary
1
The best way to determine susceptibility is through household contact tracing, as it controls for *exposure* - everyone gets more or less the same
There are many of these. Results vary, which we expect because infection is complicated
That's why we need to combine results
2
Here's 4 meta analyses; all find young children are much less susceptible than adults. Some that teens are too