The biblical picture of false prophets bears a striking resemblance to the handful of theologians in the SBC whose dalliances with heresy have redounded to their own professional benefit.
Some proponents of ESS misrepresented the very nature of the Trinity in an effort to legitimate a niche research agenda that they were well-positioned to lead (largely because the most fertile theological minds of our era simply have no interest in advancing male headship).
These men spend their days stirring up controversy, insisting that God’s people break fellowship over the secondary effects of tertiary issues that are a matter of grave importance only to men whose professional advancement depends on it.
It’s clever in a strictly Machiavellian sense: find a subject that none of the really talented people in your field care about, create a journal for it, publish in your own journal, and then leverage politics and personal connections to demand that it be taken seriously.
Now these men are attempting to persuade God’s people that demands for systemic justice are false teaching. “Everything’s good,” they say. “God has instructed me to assure you that the status quo is just fine, and judgment is not forthcoming.” faithphilosophyandpolitics.org/2020/10/14/whe…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Coley

Scott Coley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scott_m_coley

15 Dec
Racism, Misogyny, Abuse: Why the SBC Keeps Getting it Wrong

co-authored with @SusanCodone

By Southern Seminary's account of its history, when the SBC "...established SBTS in 1859, the prevailing orthodoxy of its white clergy included commitment to the legitimacy of slavery.”
The phrase ‘prevailing orthodoxy’ is doing a lot of rhetorical work here: ‘orthodoxy’ evokes the safe harbor of official sanction, while ‘prevailing’ conjures a sense of resignation to the inertia of established norms.
Yet the question must be asked: in 1859, how prevalent was the view that the institution of slavery was morally legitimate? Across the West? No: America’s N. Atlantic peers abolished slavery in the 1840s. Among Americans? No: Civil War was two years away. Among Protestants? No.
Read 20 tweets
5 Dec
Well now you just seem more confused than before.
You still haven’t answered my question; but I gather that your assessment of Gen.1 derives from the interpretive principle that Scripture should be read in its plainest sense unless the text itself clearly indicates otherwise.
I agree with this principle; but I suspect we disagree on how to apply the ‘unless’ clause: I think that if reading a text as a straightforward recounting of empirical facts renders that text incoherent, this *just is* the text indicating that it’s not meant to be read that way.
Centuries upon centuries of Christian scholarship—including luminaries like Origen and Augustine—have questioned or rejected your assessment of Gen.1, on precisely these grounds.
Read 14 tweets
27 Nov
For over four decades, American evangelicals have embraced the special-interest paradigm of political engagement—arguing, in effect, that the interests of Christians should take priority over conflicting claims of other interest groups.

This has been a terrible mistake.
If there is objective moral truth then there is objective truth about what people deserve and what we owe to each other—which is to say, justice.

Objective moral truth entails objective truth about justice. It’s as simple as that.
And if there is objective truth about justice, then our efforts in the political sphere should conform to that truth—which is to say, achieving justice should be our only political objective.

Any other goal would be immoral.
Read 10 tweets
25 Nov
If @MBTS is determined to give Owen a platform for his pronouncements on institutional ethics, its administration might consider granting him a teaching reduction that would afford him leisure to familiarize himself with the basic contours of the subject.
Here, once again, Owen conflates the concept of ‘systemic racism’ with Critical Race Theory (CRT).

In point of fact, the concept of systemic racism is used across a number of disciplines to describe a variety of phenomena.
Two general fields of application stand out. One has to do with psychology—racist attitudes and so forth. The other has to do with institutions.
Read 14 tweets
23 Nov
One of the culture war’s more absurd mantras is the threat of evangelical leaders capitulating to worldly demands for justice out of an appetite for popular esteem.

This is pure propaganda.
In fact the opposite is true: those who give any thought to popular opinion relish every opportunity to shock unbelievers with their abrasive rhetoric—thereby inviting backlash, which serves as a pretext for claims of persecution.
Under guise of combating “wokeness”—a vacuous notion contrived to provoke illiterate fear—men with evangelical platforms make unlearned and outrageous pronouncements on subjects ranging from political economy to public health.
Read 6 tweets
13 Nov
A myth says what is false in order to reveal truth.

A lie says what is false in order to obscure truth.
The myth at the core of our nation is that America provides liberty and justice for all in equal measure.

The truth underlying the myth is that equality before the law is a worthy aspiration.
We lie to ourselves when we act as though this myth reflects the reality of our present existence: we obscure the truth when we tell ourselves that the aspiration has been realized, or realized enough.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!