Liberal Democrat Party requires parliamentary candidate to apologise and seek mentoring after calling women 'terfs' /1 fairplayforwomen.com/liberal-democr…
On 2 December 2020 the Liberal Democrats held an official complaints hearing after receiving multiple reports from members of the public about the unacceptable behaviour of one of their prospective parliamentary candidates (PPC) on social media /2
They ruled that a tweet posted by Dan Schmeising, their parliamentary candidate for Cardiff South and Penarth, during the run-up to the 2019 General Election brought the party into disrepute.
"Save yourself the stress and just block them mate, TERFs aren’t worth the hassle”. /3
The Panel imposed sanctions, including an apology. They also endorsed a recommendation that the Party should consider training for men in their 20s and 30s to educate them on the use of misogynistic language. /4
While they agreed is "appropriate not to be drawn into debate with those, like racists, whose views are abhorrent to right-thinking people, the panel *did not agree* that discussion about the interaction of trans rights ... can be characterised in the same way" /5
The content of the apology was set by the panel.
"I should not have used language capable of suggesting that views held by women who do not accept that trans women should in all circumstances and for all purposes be treated as women should not be heard". /6
It is also required that to continue as an approved parliamentary candidate for the Lib Dems, he should seek mentoring from an experienced candidate. To “enable him to improve his political judgment and willingness to engage appropriately with those with whom he disagrees”. /7
Last year we found 21 parliamentary candidates, including 9 Lib Dems, standing in the 2019 General Election who have labelled women as ‘terfs’ or ‘transphobes’ simply for not accepting that transwomen should be treated as women in all circumstances /8 fairplayforwomen.com/pcc/
Mr Schmeising is another example of a parliamentary candidate who thought it was acceptable to dismiss women’s opposing views in this way.
Only on this occasion he was reported to the Party by members of the public for his behaviour and found in breach of Party standards /9
This is not the first time a Lib Dem representative has been found to be in breach of Party standards for failing to treat members of the public with respect on this issue /10 fairplayforwomen.com/liberal-democr…
It is not acceptable to insult and dismiss women who hold the view that sex-based rights matter …. and thankfully it appears that the Liberal Democrat Party agrees /11
MPs asked gentle, empathetic, sometimes leading questions of the trans witnesses. They expressed sympathy with their position, did not challenge or request evidential back-up for a single claim. That their sympathies lay with trans people & not women was clear from the start /2
Peter Gibson’s questions were based on the premise that the needs of trans community had simply been ignored by the government rather than fairly balanced alongside all stakeholder groups in society /3
Legislators and policy makers must make evidenced-based decisions to ensure the impact on all affected groups is considered, understood and fairly balanced. This means they need information on the demographics of different groups in society, including for transwomen /2
Our evidence matters in two areas of law: Equality Act 2010 & GRA2004. It helps service providers evaluate whether their single-sex service is a "proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim". It also informs legislators on the impact of GRA reform on women in prison /3
This is a population-based study using records from a variety of registers in Sweden in 2011. They found 324 transgender people that had undertaken sex reassignment surgery between 1973 and 2003. /2
It's a relatively small study of transsexuals - not self-identifying transgender people as Kathleen said @Docstockk
A total of 60 crimes were identified, 14 of those classified as violent crimes. Eight violent crimes had been committed by transwomen and six by transmen. /3
In 2016 the IOC was desperate to find an easy solution to let pre-op transwomen play women’s sport. They used weak retrospective & anecdotal data that showed a few transwomen running slower after transition - the findings of transwoman Joanna Harper /2
This led to every sport from elite to grassroots introducing new transgender policies based on lowering testosterone for 1 year. The future of women’s sport balancing on flimsy anecdotal evidence from a few trans amateur runners & cyclists. It’s now coming back to bite them /3
Women and girls NEED access to male-free toilets and changing rooms. This is just one of the heart-wrenching stories we've received on this topic /1
This is why we campaign for female-only spaces for women and girls. Sex matters in policy making and we make sure that never gets forgotten. You can read our other stories and resources here /2
This is why we will be submitting evidence to this government review on toilet provision in the UK. Female-only toilets are important and necessary. Mixed-sex toilets *exclude* women and girls from the services they need. /3